BACKGROUND: Albuminuria, defined as urine albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥30 mg/g, is a diagnostic component of chronic kidney disease (CKD). National estimates of ACR and CKD prevalence have been based on single random urine samples. Although 2 urine samples or a first morning void are known to produce different estimates of ACR, the impact of differing urine sampling schemes on nationally estimated rates of CKD is unknown. METHODS: In 2009-2010, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) participants provided 2 untimed urine samples for sequential ACR measurement: an initial random urine collected in the NHANES mobile examination center and a subsequent first morning void collected at home. Rates of albuminuria were calculated in the overall population and broken down by demographics, diagnosed diabetes and hypertension status, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). RESULTS: Overall, 43.5% of adults with increased ACR (≥30 mg/g) in a random urine also had increased ACR in a first morning urine. This percentage was higher among individuals ≥50 years old (48.9%), males (53.3%), participants with diagnosed diabetes (56.3%) and hypertension (51.5%), and eGFR <60 mL/min/1.72m(2) (56.9%). The use of confirmed increased ACR (defined as the presence of ACR ≥30 mg/g in both samples taken within 10 days) to define CKD resulted in a lower overall prevalence (11.6%) than first morning urine (12.7%) or random spot urine only (15.2%). CONCLUSIONS: ACR measured on random urine samples appears to overestimate the prevalence of albuminuria compared to first morning urine collections.
BACKGROUND:Albuminuria, defined as urine albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥30 mg/g, is a diagnostic component of chronic kidney disease (CKD). National estimates of ACR and CKD prevalence have been based on single random urine samples. Although 2 urine samples or a first morning void are known to produce different estimates of ACR, the impact of differing urine sampling schemes on nationally estimated rates of CKD is unknown. METHODS: In 2009-2010, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) participants provided 2 untimed urine samples for sequential ACR measurement: an initial random urine collected in the NHANES mobile examination center and a subsequent first morning void collected at home. Rates of albuminuria were calculated in the overall population and broken down by demographics, diagnosed diabetes and hypertension status, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). RESULTS: Overall, 43.5% of adults with increased ACR (≥30 mg/g) in a random urine also had increased ACR in a first morning urine. This percentage was higher among individuals ≥50 years old (48.9%), males (53.3%), participants with diagnosed diabetes (56.3%) and hypertension (51.5%), and eGFR <60 mL/min/1.72m(2) (56.9%). The use of confirmed increased ACR (defined as the presence of ACR ≥30 mg/g in both samples taken within 10 days) to define CKD resulted in a lower overall prevalence (11.6%) than first morning urine (12.7%) or random spot urine only (15.2%). CONCLUSIONS:ACR measured on random urine samples appears to overestimate the prevalence of albuminuria compared to first morning urine collections.
Authors: S Chadban; M Howell; S Twigg; M Thomas; G Jerums; A Cass; D Campbell; K Nicholls; A Tong; G Mangos; A Stack; R J MacIsaac; S Girgis; R Colagiuri; S Colagiuri; J Craig Journal: Nephrology (Carlton) Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Ann M O'Hare; Susan M Hailpern; Meda E Pavkov; Nilka Rios-Burrows; Indra Gupta; Charles Maynard; Jeff Todd-Stenberg; Rudolph A Rodriguez; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Rajiv Saran; Desmond E Williams Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2010-06-14
Authors: Camille A Jones; Mildred E Francis; Mark S Eberhardt; Blanche Chavers; Josef Coresh; Michael Engelgau; John W Kusek; Danita Byrd-Holt; K M Venkat Narayan; William H Herman; Camara P Jones; Marcel Salive; Lawrence Y Agodoa Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Hiddo J Lambers Heerspink; Ron T Gansevoort; Barry M Brenner; Mark E Cooper; Hans Henrik Parving; Shahnaz Shahinfar; Dick de Zeeuw Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Andrew S Levey; Lesley A Stevens; Christopher H Schmid; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Alejandro F Castro; Harold I Feldman; John W Kusek; Paul Eggers; Frederick Van Lente; Tom Greene; Josef Coresh Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Daniel Murphy; Charles E McCulloch; Feng Lin; Tanushree Banerjee; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; Mark S Eberhardt; Hal Morgenstern; Meda E Pavkov; Rajiv Saran; Neil R Powe; Chi-Yuan Hsu Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Olivier J Wouters; Donal J O'Donoghue; James Ritchie; Panos G Kanavos; Andrew S Narva Journal: Nat Rev Nephrol Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 28.314
Authors: Jonathan A Bolanos; Christina M Yuan; Dustin J Little; David K Oliver; Steven R Howard; Kevin C Abbott; Stephen W Olson Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Annette von Drygalski; Nicholas A Kolaitis; Ricki Bettencourt; Jaclyn Bergstrom; R Kruse-Jarres; Doris V Quon; Christina Wassel; Ming C Li; Jill Waalen; Darlene J Elias; Laurent O Mosnier; Matthew Allison Journal: Hypertension Date: 2013-04-29 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Amy K Mottl; John B Buse; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; Ronald J Sigal; Carolyn F Pedley; Vasilios Papademetriou; Debra L Simmons; Lois Katz; Josyf C Mychaleckyj; Timothy E Craven Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Allison R Webel; Julie Schexnayder; Patricia A Cioe; Julie A Zuñiga Journal: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care Date: 2021 May-Jun 01 Impact factor: 1.809
Authors: Citlalli Osorio-Yáñez; Julio C Ayllon-Vergara; Laura Arreola-Mendoza; Guadalupe Aguilar-Madrid; Erika Hernández-Castellanos; Luz C Sánchez-Peña; Luz M Del Razo Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2015-02-27 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Chi D Chu; Neil R Powe; Charles E McCulloch; Tanushree Banerjee; Deidra C Crews; Rajiv Saran; Jennifer Bragg-Gresham; Hal Morgenstern; Meda E Pavkov; Sharon H Saydah; Delphine S Tuot Journal: Hypertension Date: 2020-11-16 Impact factor: 10.190