Literature DB >> 30361335

Long-Term Effects of Intensive Glycemic and Blood Pressure Control and Fenofibrate Use on Kidney Outcomes.

Amy K Mottl1, John B Buse2, Faramarz Ismail-Beigi3, Ronald J Sigal4, Carolyn F Pedley5, Vasilios Papademetriou6, Debra L Simmons7, Lois Katz8, Josyf C Mychaleckyj9, Timothy E Craven10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In people with type 2 diabetes, aggressive control of glycemia, BP, and lipids have resulted in conflicting short-term (<5 years) kidney outcomes. We aimed to determine the long-term kidney effects of these interventions. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) was a multifactorial intervention study in people with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular disease (n=10,251), to examine the effects of intensive glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c <6.0% versus 7%-7.9%), BP control (systolic BP <120 mm Hg versus <140 mm Hg) or fenofibrate versus placebo added to simvastatin on cardiovascular events and death. The glycemia trial lasted 3.7 years and participants were followed for another 6.5 years in ACCORDION, the ACCORD Follow-On Study. The post hoc primary composite kidney outcome was defined as incident macroalbuminuria, creatinine doubling, need for dialysis, or death by any cause. Cox proportional hazards regression estimated the effect of each intervention on the composite outcome and individual components. In secondary outcome analyses, competing risk regression was used to account for the risk of death in incident kidney outcomes. Analyses were adjusted for sociodemographics, randomization groups, and clinical factors.
RESULTS: There were 988 cases of incident macroalbuminuria, 954 with doubling of creatinine, 351 requiring dialysis, and 1905 deaths. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the composite outcome with intensive glycemic, BP control, and fenofibrate use compared with standard therapy were 0.92 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.86 to 0.98), 1.16 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.28), and 1.16 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.27). Multivariable, secondary outcome analyses showed that in the glycemia trial, only macroalbuminuria was significantly decreased (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.77). In the BP and lipid trials, only creatinine doubling was affected (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.06 and HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.61 to 2.49, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: In people with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular disease, intensive glycemic control may result in a long-term reduction in macroalbuminuria; however, intensive BP control and fenofibrates may increase the risk for adverse kidney events.
Copyright © 2018 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure Determination; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fenofibrate; Glycated Hemoglobin A; Random Allocation; Simvastatin; blood pressure; blood pressure control; clinical trial; creatinine; diabetic nephropathy; fibrates; glycemic control; kidney; lipids; renal dialysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30361335      PMCID: PMC6237052          DOI: 10.2215/CJN.06200518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1555-9041            Impact factor:   8.237


  41 in total

1.  Combined intensive blood pressure and glycemic control does not produce an additive benefit on microvascular outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; Timothy E Craven; Patrick J O'Connor; Diane Karl; Jorge Calles-Escandon; Irene Hramiak; Saul Genuth; William C Cushman; Hertzel C Gerstein; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Lois Katz; Ulrich Schubart
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Cardiovascular Outcomes in Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes: Impact of Blood Pressure Level and Presence of Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Vasilios Papademetriou; Misbah Zaheer; Michael Doumas; Laura Lovato; William B Applegate; Costas Tsioufis; Amy Mottle; Zubin Punthakee; William C Cushman
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.754

3.  Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  William C Cushman; Gregory W Evans; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey A Cutler; Denise G Simons-Morton; Jan N Basile; Marshall A Corson; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Lois Katz; Kevin A Peterson; William T Friedewald; John B Buse; J Thomas Bigger; Hertzel C Gerstein; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Lowering blood pressure reduces renal events in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Bastiaan E de Galan; Vlado Perkovic; Toshiharu Ninomiya; Avinesh Pillai; Anushka Patel; Alan Cass; Bruce Neal; Neil Poulter; Stephen Harrap; Carl-Erik Mogensen; Mark Cooper; Michel Marre; Bryan Williams; Pavel Hamet; Giuseppe Mancia; Mark Woodward; Paul Glasziou; Diederick E Grobbee; Stephen MacMahon; John Chalmers
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Kidney disease and increased mortality risk in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Maryam Afkarian; Michael C Sachs; Bryan Kestenbaum; Irl B Hirsch; Katherine R Tuttle; Jonathan Himmelfarb; Ian H de Boer
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Effects of atorvastatin on kidney outcomes and cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes: an analysis from the Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS).

Authors:  Helen M Colhoun; D John Betteridge; Paul N Durrington; Graham A Hitman; H Andrew W Neil; Shona J Livingstone; Valentine Charlton-Menys; David A DeMicco; John H Fuller
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 8.860

7.  Nine-Year Effects of 3.7 Years of Intensive Glycemic Control on Cardiovascular Outcomes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Follow-up of blood-pressure lowering and glucose control in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Sophia Zoungas; John Chalmers; Bruce Neal; Laurent Billot; Qiang Li; Yoichiro Hirakawa; Hisatomi Arima; Helen Monaghan; Rohina Joshi; Stephen Colagiuri; Mark E Cooper; Paul Glasziou; Diederick Grobbee; Pavel Hamet; Stephen Harrap; Simon Heller; Liu Lisheng; Giuseppe Mancia; Michel Marre; David R Matthews; Carl E Mogensen; Vlado Perkovic; Neil Poulter; Anthony Rodgers; Bryan Williams; Stephen MacMahon; Anushka Patel; Mark Woodward
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Observation on renal outcomes in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial.

Authors:  Lily Agrawal; Nasrin Azad; Nicholas V Emanuele; Gideon D Bahn; Derrick G Kaufman; Thomas E Moritz; William C Duckworth; Carlos Abraira
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Coronary Artery Disease Is a Predictor of Progression to Dialysis in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Anemia: An Analysis of the Trial to Reduce Cardiovascular Events With Aranesp Therapy (TREAT).

Authors:  Marwa A Sabe; Brian Claggett; Emmanuel A Burdmann; Akshay S Desai; Peter Ivanovich; Reshma Kewalramani; Eldrin F Lewis; John J V McMurray; Kurt A Olson; Patrick Parfrey; Scott D Solomon; Marc A Pfeffer
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  8 in total

1.  The Association of Fenofibrate with Kidney Tubular Injury in a Subgroup of Participants in the ACCORD Trial.

Authors:  Kinsuk Chauhan; Girish N Nadkarni; Neha Debnath; Lili Chan; Aparna Saha; Amit X Garg; Chirag R Parikh; Steven G Coca
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  ACCORDION: Ensuring That We Hear the Music Clearly.

Authors:  Muh Geot Wong; Hiddo J L Heerspink; Vlado Perkovic
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Blood pressure targets and kidney and cardiovascular disease: same data but discordant guidelines.

Authors:  Bethany Roehm; Daniel E Weiner
Journal:  Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  The Prevalence, Progress and Risk Factor Control of Chronic Kidney Disease in Chinese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care.

Authors:  Lingwang An; Qiuzhi Yu; Hong Tang; Xianglan Li; Dandan Wang; Qi Tang; Haiyang Xing; Yali He; Xiaona Zhao; Shuhui Zhao; Yaujiunn Lee; Juming Lu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 6.055

5.  Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Pemafibrate, a Novel Selective Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-α Modulator (SPPARMα), in Dyslipidemic Patients with Renal Impairment.

Authors:  Koutaro Yokote; Shizuya Yamashita; Hidenori Arai; Eiichi Araki; Hideki Suganami; Shun Ishibashi; On Behalf Of The K-Study Group
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Mild to moderate chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Gayatri Lessey; Konstantinos Stavropoulos; Vasilios Papademetriou
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2019-08-22

Review 7.  Selective Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Alpha Modulators (SPPARMα): New Opportunities to Reduce Residual Cardiovascular Risk in Chronic Kidney Disease?

Authors:  Jean-Charles Fruchart; Michel P Hermans; Jamila Fruchart-Najib
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.113

8.  Management of dyslipidaemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: a position paper endorsed by the Italian Society of Nephrology.

Authors:  Roberto Pontremoli; Vincenzo Bellizzi; Stefano Bianchi; Roberto Bigazzi; Valeria Cernaro; Lucia Del Vecchio; Luca De Nicola; Giovanna Leoncini; Francesca Mallamaci; Carmine Zoccali; Michele Buemi
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 3.902

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.