Literature DB >> 23315178

"He didn't say that thalassaemia might come up" - β-thalassaemia carriers' experiences and attitudes.

Nicole E Cousens1, Clara L Gaff, Sylvia A Metcalfe, Martin B Delatycki.   

Abstract

Tests for haemoglobinopathy carrier status are the commonest genetic screening tests undertaken internationally. Carrier screening for β-thalassaemia is not coordinated in Victoria, Australia, and is instead incorporated into routine practice where most women are screened antenatally, through a full blood examination (FBE). Little is known about how women are screened for β-thalassaemia in Australia as well as their attitudes towards the screening process. This study was conducted to explore carriers' and carrier couples' experiences of and attitudes towards β-thalassaemia screening in Australia. Semi-structured interviews with 26 recently pregnant female carriers and ten carrier couples of β-thalassaemia were carried out. Interviews were analysed using inductive content analysis. Unexpectedly, more than half of the women had been made aware of their carrier status prior to pregnancy, with FBEs carried out for numerous reasons other than thalassaemia screening. Most women did not recall being told about thalassaemia before notification of their carrier status and therefore did not make a decision about being screened. They were generally accepting for doctors to decide about testing; however, would have preferred to have been made aware of the screening test. Women also reported receiving insufficient information after being notified of their carrier status, leading to misconceptions and confusion. This genetic screening process, incorporated into routine care whereby informed decisions were not being made by patients, was apparently acceptable overall. Based on the results of this study, we make the following recommendations: (1) individuals should be made aware that they are being tested for thalassaemia at least before a specific thalassaemia diagnostic test is performed; (2) current understanding by known carriers of thalassaemia should be assessed and any misconceptions corrected; (3) written information should be provided to carriers; (4) referral of carrier couples to specialists in thalassaemia and genetics is strongly recommended; (5) the term 'carrier of β-thalassaemia' should be used rather than 'thalassaemia minor'.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23315178      PMCID: PMC3666831          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-012-0136-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  26 in total

1.  Proposed international guidelines on ethical issues in medical genetics and genetic services (part I).

Authors: 
Journal:  Rev Derecho Genoma Hum       Date:  1998 Jan-Jun

2.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

3.  The qualitative content analysis process.

Authors:  Satu Elo; Helvi Kyngäs
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 4.  Genetic screening and haemoglobinopathies: ethics, politics and practice.

Authors:  K Atkin; W I Ahmad
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  A holistic approach to education programs in thalassemia for a multi-ethnic population: consideration of perspectives, attitudes, and perceived needs.

Authors:  Li Ping Wong; Elizabeth George; Jin-Ai Mary Anne Tan
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-02-24

Review 6.  Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature.

Authors:  L M Ong; J C de Haes; A M Hoos; F B Lammes
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  Impact of internet use on health-related behaviors and the patient-physician relationship: a survey-based study and review.

Authors:  Suzy A Iverson; Kristin B Howard; Brian K Penney
Journal:  J Am Osteopath Assoc       Date:  2008-12

8.  Evaluation of a Tay-Sachs disease screening program.

Authors:  A A Gason; E Sheffield; A Bankier; M A Aitken; S Metcalfe; K Barlow Stewart; M B Delatycki
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 9.  The thalassaemia syndromes.

Authors:  Henrik Birgens; Rolf Ljung
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.713

10.  Offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening to pregnant women in primary care: a qualitative study of women's experiences and expectations of participation.

Authors:  Vicki Tsianakas; Karl Atkin; Michael W Calnan; Elizabeth Dormandy; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Incorporating patient perspectives in the development of a core outcome set for reproductive genetic carrier screening: a sequential systematic review.

Authors:  Ebony Richardson; Alison McEwen; Toby Newton-John; Ashley Crook; Chris Jacobs
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 5.351

2.  Responsible implementation of expanded carrier screening.

Authors:  Lidewij Henneman; Pascal Borry; Davit Chokoshvili; Martina C Cornel; Carla G van El; Francesca Forzano; Alison Hall; Heidi C Howard; Sandra Janssens; Hülya Kayserili; Phillis Lakeman; Anneke Lucassen; Sylvia A Metcalfe; Lovro Vidmar; Guido de Wert; Wybo J Dondorp; Borut Peterlin
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Experiences of a High-Risk Population with Prenatal Hemoglobinopathy Carrier Screening in a Primary Care Setting: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Kim C A Holtkamp; Phillis Lakeman; Hind Hader; Suze M J P Jans; Maria Hoenderdos; Henna A M Playfair; Martina C Cornel; Marjolein Peters; Lidewij Henneman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Social and cultural influences on genetic screening programme acceptability: A mixed-methods study of the views of adults, carriers, and family members living with thalassemia in the UK.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Corinna Clark; Elsita Jungkurth; Philip J Young
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.