Literature DB >> 23314187

Preoperative flexion does not influence postoperative flexion after rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty.

Robert D Russell1, Michael H Huo, Leslie de Jong, Richard E Jones.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Preoperative range of motion (ROM) has been regarded as one of the most important factors in predicting postoperative ROM following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Mobile-bearing TKA designs have been suggested to possibly improve the knee kinematics compared to fixed-bearing designs. The purpose of this study was to examine the difference in postoperative flexion as a function of preoperative flexion in a consecutive series of TKAs done using a posterior-stabilized rotating-platform prosthesis.
METHODS: ROM was assessed in 153 consecutive TKAs done using a rotating-platform posterior cruciate-substituting design. Patients were divided into two groups based on their preoperative ROM (Group 1 < 95°, Group 2 > 95°). The Knee Society Score (KSS) and ROM were assessed preoperatively, 3 months and 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: There was no difference in flexion 12 months after surgery between groups (mean 120° and 123°, respectively. n.s.). After 3 month follow-up, no increase in ROM was experienced by either group. Patients in Group 1 experienced significantly greater increases in both ROM (p < 0.001) and KSS (p < 0.05). There was no difference in the KSS at 12 months after surgery between groups.
CONCLUSION: In this series of patients undergoing TKA with a rotating-platform prosthesis, the preoperative ROM was not predictive of the postoperative ROM. Patients with stiff knees preoperatively may benefit from a mobile-bearing design prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23314187     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2378-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  30 in total

1.  Mobile-bearing prosthesis did not improve mid-term clinical results of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shuichi Matsuda; Hideki Mizu-uchi; Shingo Fukagawa; Hiromasa Miura; Ken Okazaki; Hideo Matsuda; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Revision total knee arthroplasty for stiffness.

Authors:  Curtis W Hartman; Nick T Ting; Mario Moric; Richard A Berger; Aaron G Rosenberg; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Fixed versus rotating platform total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.

Authors:  Scott T Ball; Hugo B Sanchez; Ormonde M Mahoney; Thomas P Schmalzried
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Factors influencing range of motion after contemporary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Akihiro Kotani; Akihiko Yonekura; Robert B Bourne
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  The P.F.C. sigma RP-F total knee arthroplasty: designed for improved performance.

Authors:  Amar S Ranawat; Sanjay K Gupta; Chitranjan S Ranawat
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.390

6.  Mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty improves patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact stress: in vivo measurements in the same patients.

Authors:  Naohiro Sawaguchi; Tokifumi Majima; Takayuki Ishigaki; Noriaki Mori; Takashi Terashima; Akio Minami
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M A Ritter; E D Campbell
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Range of motion in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Y S Anouchi; M McShane; F Kelly; J Elting; J Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Predictive range of motion after total knee replacement.

Authors:  M A Ritter; E A Stringer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Less anterior knee pain with a mobile-bearing prosthesis compared with a fixed-bearing prosthesis.

Authors:  Stefan J M Breugem; Inger N Sierevelt; Matthias U Schafroth; Leendert Blankevoort; Gerard R Schaap; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  4 in total

1.  Factors affecting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty in patients with more than 120 degrees of preoperative flexion angle.

Authors:  Kazuya Sugitani; Yuji Arai; Hisatake Takamiya; Ryu Terauchi; Shuji Nakagawa; Keiichiro Ueshima; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Predictors of flexion using the rotating concave-convex total knee arthroplasty: preoperative range of motion is not the only determinant.

Authors:  Jean Langlois; Anaïs Charles-Nelson; Sandrine Katsahian; Julien Beldame; Benjamin Lefebvre; Michel Bercovy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Mobile-bearing prosthesis and intraoperative gap balancing are not predictors of superior knee flexion: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Yukihide Minoda; Hiroyoshi Iwaki; Mitsuhiko Ikebuchi; Taku Yoshida; Shigekazu Mizokawa; Maki Itokazu; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Do various factors affect the frequency of manipulation under anesthesia after primary total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Kimona Issa; Aiman Rifai; Matthew R Boylan; Sina Pourtaheri; Vincent K McInerney; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.