Literature DB >> 25533698

Predictors of flexion using the rotating concave-convex total knee arthroplasty: preoperative range of motion is not the only determinant.

Jean Langlois1, Anaïs Charles-Nelson, Sandrine Katsahian, Julien Beldame, Benjamin Lefebvre, Michel Bercovy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The range of motion achieved after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) affects many daily activities and overall patients' satisfaction. This study aims to define the determinants affecting post-operative midterm active flexion according to a specific cruciate-sacrificing prosthesis, the rotating concave-convex (ROCC(®)) TKA.
METHOD: Four hundred and eighty-four consecutive patients (584 TKAs) were prospectively followed. After baseline patient demographics and anatomical characteristics, clinical and radiological post-operative assessments were periodically recorded. The rotational alignment of the femoral component was additionally reported for 120 patients. Eligibility for final inclusion was a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Univariate analyses followed by a multivariate model were fitted to determine the independent predictors of midterm active knee flexion.
RESULTS: Thirty-four TKA (5.8%) were excluded for a secondary surgery before their 50 years, 69 patients died (11.8%), and 21 (3.6%) were lost to follow-up. Overall, 460 TKAs were included. The post-operative mean knee flexion angle was measured at 127.7° ± 9.3°. Significant factors affecting final flexion under univariate analyses were the patient height and body mass index, the absence of previous surgery, a depressive state, the preoperative flexion angle, a preoperative flexion contracture, a patellar residual subluxation, the reconstructed patellar height, and the rotation of the femoral component. The multivariate model confirmed the patient's height, a depression, the preoperative flexion angle, a patellar residual subluxation, and the patellar height as statistically significant determinants.
CONCLUSION: Aside from the preoperative flexion angle, numerous predictors of flexion, both patient- and procedure-related were identified. Surgeons should take these into account both when adequately informing their patient before surgery and when performing the arthroplasty itself. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, Level II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25533698     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3479-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  28 in total

1.  Should the 'no thumb technique' be the golden standard for evaluating patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Woo-Shin Cho; Jae-Ho Woo; Ho-Youn Park; Yoon-Seok Youm; Byung-Kwan Kim
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Factors influencing range of motion after contemporary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Akihiro Kotani; Akihiko Yonekura; Robert B Bourne
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  High-flexion total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  William J Long; Giles R Scuderi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Rotational alignment of the distal femur: a literature review.

Authors:  J Victor
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.256

5.  [Method of measuring the height of the patella].

Authors:  J Caton
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 0.500

6.  Range of motion in total knee replacement.

Authors:  Y S Anouchi; M McShane; F Kelly; J Elting; J Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Factors affecting range of flexion after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Kawamura; R B Bourne
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.601

8.  Patellar resurfacing versus retention in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A Feller; R J Bartlett; D M Lang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-03

9.  A prospective randomized clinical trial of patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing in bilateral TKA.

Authors:  R S J Burnett; J L Boone; K P McCarthy; S Rosenzweig; R L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Femoral component rotation and arthrofibrosis following mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J G Boldt; J B Stiehl; J Hodler; M Zanetti; U Munzinger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  4 in total

1.  Radiographic measurement of the posterior femoral offset is not precise.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Sophie Honecker; Yves Chammai
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Patella height is not altered by descending medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) compared to ascending HTO.

Authors:  Matthias Krause; Tobias Claus Drenck; Alexander Korthaus; Achim Preiss; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Ralph Akoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Tibiofemoral rotational alignment affects flexion angles in navigated posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazunari Ishida; Nao Shibanuma; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Akihiko Toda; Shinya Oka; Kazuki Kodato; Koji Takayama; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Navigation-based tibial rotation at 90° of flexion is associated with better range of motion in navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazunari Ishida; Nao Shibanuma; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Hiroshi Sasaki; Koji Takayama; Yuji Hiroshima; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.