Literature DB >> 25002219

Do various factors affect the frequency of manipulation under anesthesia after primary total knee arthroplasty?

Kimona Issa1, Aiman Rifai, Matthew R Boylan, Sina Pourtaheri, Vincent K McInerney, Michael A Mont.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the most important goals of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is to achieve a functional range of motion (ROM). However, up to 20% of patients fail to do so, which can impair activities of daily living. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of various (1) demographic factors; (2) comorbidities; and (3) knee-specific factors on the frequency of manipulation under anesthesia, which was used as an indicator of knee stiffness after a primary TKA.
METHODS: We evaluated the registries of two high-volume centers and reviewed all 3182 TKAs that were performed between 2005 and 2011 to identify all patients who had undergone manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). A total of 156 knees in 133 patients underwent MUA after an index arthroplasty. These patients were compared in a one-to-four ratio with a group of patients with satisfactory ROM drawn from the same database who met prespecified criteria and who had not undergone MUA. Effects of various factors, including age, sex, body mass index, race, comorbidities, and the underlying cause of knee arthritis, were compared between these two cohorts using multivariable logistic regressions.
RESULTS: After controlling for various confounding, nonwhite race was associated with an increase (odds ratio [OR], 2.01; p=0.03), and age≥65 years (OR, 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.74; p=0.0179) was associated with a reduction in the incidence of MUA. In comorbidities, diabetes (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.02-2.32; p=0.03), high cholesterol levels (OR, 2.70; p=0.03), and tobacco smoking (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.03-2.47; p=0.03) were associated with an increase in frequency of MUA. In knee-specific factors, preoperative knee ROM of less than 100° (OR, 0.80; p<0.0001) and knee osteonecrosis (p=3.61; 95% CI, 1.29-10.1; p=0.014) were associated with increased frequency of MUA.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified several demographic, medical, and knee-specific factors that were associated with poor postoperative ROM in our patients undergoing TKA. Patients who have multiple risk factors may benefit from preoperative counseling to set realistic ROM expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25002219      PMCID: PMC4390931          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3772-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  29 in total

1.  Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M D Ries; M Badalamente
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Functional problems and arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thorsten M Seyler; David R Marker; Anil Bhave; Johannes F Plate; German A Marulanda; Peter M Bonutti; Ronald E Delanois; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Preoperative flexion. Does it influence postoperative flexion after posterior-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  B S Parsley; G A Engh; K A Dwyer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  High level of residual symptoms in young patients after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Ryan M Nunley; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Erin L Ruh; John C Clohisy; William G Hamilton; Craig J Della Valle; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Predictive range of motion after total knee replacement.

Authors:  M A Ritter; E A Stringer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Gait characteristics of the rheumatoid knee.

Authors:  D B Kettelkamp; P E Leaverton; S Misol
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1972-01

7.  Incidence and reasons for nonrevision reoperation after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Benjamin Zmistowski; Camilo Restrepo; Lauren K Kahl; Javad Parvizi; Peter F Sharkey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Arthrofibrosis associated with total knee arthroplasty: gray-scale and power Doppler sonographic findings.

Authors:  Jens G Boldt; Urs K Munzinger; Marco Zanetti; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Femoral component rotation and arthrofibrosis following mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J G Boldt; J B Stiehl; J Hodler; M Zanetti; U Munzinger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  Long-term outcomes of MUA for stiffness in primary TKA.

Authors:  Robert Pivec; Kimona Issa; Mark Kester; Steven F Harwin; Michael A Mont
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.757

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Human Fibrosis: Is There Evidence for a Genetic Predisposition in Musculoskeletal Tissues?

Authors:  Louis Dagneaux; Aaron R Owen; Jacob W Bettencourt; Jonathan D Barlow; Peter C Amadio; Jean P Kocher; Mark E Morrey; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo; Daniel J Berry; Andre J van Wijnen; Matthew P Abdel
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Low complication rates in outpatient total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  David A Crawford; Joanne B Adams; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-05-18       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Factors affecting range of motion following two-stage revision arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic knee infection.

Authors:  Doo-Yeol Kim; Young-Chae Seo; Chang-Wan Kim; Chang-Rack Lee; Soo-Hwan Jung
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-07-18

4.  Efficacy of non-operative treatment of patients with knee arthrofibrosis using high-intensity home mechanical therapy: a retrospective review of 11,000+ patients.

Authors:  Shaun K Stinton; Samantha J Beckley; Thomas P Branch
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 2.677

5.  Manipulation under anesthesia: to do or not to do, that is the question.

Authors:  Annette W-Dahl
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.925

6.  Manipulation under anesthesia after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study of 145 patients.

Authors:  Julius Sala; Antti Jaroma; Reijo Sund; Jukka Huopio; Heikki Kröger; Joonas Sirola
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.925

Review 7.  Manipulation under anesthesia following total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive review of literature.

Authors:  A Kornuijt; D Das; T Sijbesma; L de Vries; W van der Weegen
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-03-15

8.  Education, engagement and provision of empathy by trained counselor enhances the patient satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sanjay Bhalchandra Londhe; Ravi Vinod Shah; Pritesh Omprakash Agrawal; Jehangir Malcolm Pestonji; Shubhankar Sanjay Londhe; Maulik Kiranbhai Langaliya
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-03-23

9.  Acquired Idiopathic Stiffness After Contemporary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Results Over 25 Years.

Authors:  Aaron R Owen; Meagan E Tibbo; Andre J van Wijnen; Mark W Pagnano; Daniel J Berry; Matthew P Abdel
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.435

10.  Data Collection and Analysis Using Wearable Sensors for Monitoring Knee Range of Motion after Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chih-Yen Chiang; Kun-Hui Chen; Kai-Chun Liu; Steen Jun-Ping Hsu; Chia-Tai Chan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.