OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of time-intensity curves obtained after sulphur hefluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent injection to discriminate responders from non-responders among patients with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Forty-three patients (29 male and 14 female; mean age ± SD, 48.5 ± 17.17 years) with initial diagnosis of active CD were recruited. In each patient, the therapeutic outcome was assessed after 12 weeks from the beginning of pharmacologic treatment. The terminal ileal loop was scanned after sulphur hexafluoride-filled microbubble injection, and the digital cine-clip registered during the first-pass dynamic enhancement was quantified in gray-scale levels. The percentage of maximal enhancement, time to peak enhancement, and area under the time-intensity curve in responders vs. non-responders were compared by Mann-Whitney U non-parametric test. RESULTS: Responders (n = 25 patients) vs. non-responders (n = 18) differed in the area under the time-intensity curve (621.58 ± 374.53 vs. 1,199.64 ± 386.39 P < 0.05), while they did not differ in percentage of maximal enhancement (41.26 ± 15.22 vs. 43.17 ± 4.41, P = 0.25) and time to peak enhancement (11.31 ± 3.06 vs. 10.12 ± 3.47, P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: The area under the time-intensity curve obtained after microbubble injection was the only parameter to discriminate responders from non-responders among patients with CD during pharmacologic treatment. KEY POINTS: • Dynamic ultrasound using microbubble contrast agents can help assess inflammatory bowel disease • Time-intensity curves can assess therapeutic outcome in Crohn's disease (CD) • The area under the time-intensity curve differentiates responders from non-responders during pharmacological treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of time-intensity curves obtained after sulphur hefluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent injection to discriminate responders from non-responders among patients with Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: Forty-three patients (29 male and 14 female; mean age ± SD, 48.5 ± 17.17 years) with initial diagnosis of active CD were recruited. In each patient, the therapeutic outcome was assessed after 12 weeks from the beginning of pharmacologic treatment. The terminal ileal loop was scanned after sulphur hexafluoride-filled microbubble injection, and the digital cine-clip registered during the first-pass dynamic enhancement was quantified in gray-scale levels. The percentage of maximal enhancement, time to peak enhancement, and area under the time-intensity curve in responders vs. non-responders were compared by Mann-Whitney U non-parametric test. RESULTS: Responders (n = 25 patients) vs. non-responders (n = 18) differed in the area under the time-intensity curve (621.58 ± 374.53 vs. 1,199.64 ± 386.39 P < 0.05), while they did not differ in percentage of maximal enhancement (41.26 ± 15.22 vs. 43.17 ± 4.41, P = 0.25) and time to peak enhancement (11.31 ± 3.06 vs. 10.12 ± 3.47, P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: The area under the time-intensity curve obtained after microbubble injection was the only parameter to discriminate responders from non-responders among patients with CD during pharmacologic treatment. KEY POINTS: • Dynamic ultrasound using microbubble contrast agents can help assess inflammatory bowel disease • Time-intensity curves can assess therapeutic outcome in Crohn's disease (CD) • The area under the time-intensity curve differentiates responders from non-responders during pharmacological treatment.
Authors: Antonio De Franco; Alessandra Di Veronica; Alessandro Armuzzi; Italia Roberto; Manuela Marzo; Barbara De Pascalis; Italo De Vitis; Alfredo Papa; Enrico Bock; Francesco M Danza; Lorenzo Bonomo; Luisa Guidi Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-12-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Damian J M Tolan; Rebecca Greenhalgh; Ian A Zealley; Steve Halligan; Stuart A Taylor Journal: Radiographics Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Tomás Ripollés; María J Martínez-Pérez; Esther Blanc; Fructuoso Delgado; José Vizuete; José M Paredes; José Vilar Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2011-08-10
Authors: Parakkal Deepak; Amy B Kolbe; Jeff L Fidler; Joel G Fletcher; John M Knudsen; David H Bruining Journal: Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) Date: 2016-04
Authors: Vasileios Rafailidis; Annamaria Deganello; Tom Watson; Paul S Sidhu; Maria E Sellars Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Ami Gokli; Jonathan R Dillman; Paul D Humphries; Damjana Ključevšek; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Erika Rubesova; Marcelo S Takahashi; Sudha A Anupindi Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2021-05-12
Authors: Huaijun Wang; Jean-Marc Hyvelin; Stephen A Felt; Ismayil Guracar; Jose G Vilches-Moure; Samir Cherkaoui; Thierry Bettinger; Lu Tian; Amelie M Lutz; Jürgen K Willmann Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 29.146
Authors: C S Horjus Talabur Horje; R Bruijnen; L Roovers; M J M Groenen; F B M Joosten; P J Wahab Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-31 Impact factor: 3.240