OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in determining the severity of active Crohn's disease. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients who were considered to be in active period of Crohn's disease were included. Conventional ultrasound was employed to measure the thicknesses of interior, exterior and the whole bowel walls. Qualitative and quantitative CEUS analysis of the interior, exterior and the whole intestinal walls were also performed. Correlations between these methods and the severity of Crohn's disease were assessed. RESULTS: Endoscopy grading system identified 19 patients with mild disease and 18 with severe disease. In discriminating severe Crohn's disease from mild disease, the cut-off value for the thickness of the entire bowel wall was 6.8 mm by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, with area under ROC (AUROC) of 0.84, sensitivity of 94.4%, specificity of 68.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 61.1%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 69.2%, and Youden's index of 0.628. The cut-off value for thickness of the interior intestinal wall was 4.8 mm (AUROC, 0.81; sensitivity, 88.9%; specificity, 63.2%; PPV, 85.7%; NPV, 69.6%; Youden's index, 0.521). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and Youden's index of CEUS qualitative analysis were 100% (18/18), 57.9% (11/19), 64.3% (18/26), 100% (11/11), 78.4% (29/37), and 0.579, respectively. Quantitative comparison revealed that patients with mild disease and those with severe disease differed only in Imax of inner bowel wall enhancement (2746.9 ± 911 vs. 12814.5 ± 9802.4; P = 0.02) and Imax of entire wall enhancement (2106 ± 660 vs. 9864 ± 6994; P = 0.03). The cut-off value for the Imax of the entire bowel wall was 3067, with the AUROC of 0.96, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 67.7%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 88.9%, and Youden's index of 0.677; and the cut-off value for the Imax of the interior intestinal layer was 3356, with the AUROC of 1.00, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 100%, and Youden's index of 1.0. CONCLUSIONS: Both conventional ultrasound and CEUS are reliable methods in determining the severity of active Crohn's disease. The diagnostic performance in terms of Youden's index was highest for the Imax of the interior layer, in comparison with all other features on conventional ultrasound, qualitative CEUS, and quantitative CEUS.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in determining the severity of active Crohn's disease. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients who were considered to be in active period of Crohn's disease were included. Conventional ultrasound was employed to measure the thicknesses of interior, exterior and the whole bowel walls. Qualitative and quantitative CEUS analysis of the interior, exterior and the whole intestinal walls were also performed. Correlations between these methods and the severity of Crohn's disease were assessed. RESULTS: Endoscopy grading system identified 19 patients with mild disease and 18 with severe disease. In discriminating severe Crohn's disease from mild disease, the cut-off value for the thickness of the entire bowel wall was 6.8 mm by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, with area under ROC (AUROC) of 0.84, sensitivity of 94.4%, specificity of 68.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 61.1%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 69.2%, and Youden's index of 0.628. The cut-off value for thickness of the interior intestinal wall was 4.8 mm (AUROC, 0.81; sensitivity, 88.9%; specificity, 63.2%; PPV, 85.7%; NPV, 69.6%; Youden's index, 0.521). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and Youden's index of CEUS qualitative analysis were 100% (18/18), 57.9% (11/19), 64.3% (18/26), 100% (11/11), 78.4% (29/37), and 0.579, respectively. Quantitative comparison revealed that patients with mild disease and those with severe disease differed only in Imax of inner bowel wall enhancement (2746.9 ± 911 vs. 12814.5 ± 9802.4; P = 0.02) and Imax of entire wall enhancement (2106 ± 660 vs. 9864 ± 6994; P = 0.03). The cut-off value for the Imax of the entire bowel wall was 3067, with the AUROC of 0.96, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 67.7%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 88.9%, and Youden's index of 0.677; and the cut-off value for the Imax of the interior intestinal layer was 3356, with the AUROC of 1.00, sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV of 100%, and Youden's index of 1.0. CONCLUSIONS: Both conventional ultrasound and CEUS are reliable methods in determining the severity of active Crohn's disease. The diagnostic performance in terms of Youden's index was highest for the Imax of the interior layer, in comparison with all other features on conventional ultrasound, qualitative CEUS, and quantitative CEUS.
Authors: F Piscaglia; C Nolsøe; C F Dietrich; D O Cosgrove; O H Gilja; M Bachmann Nielsen; T Albrecht; L Barozzi; M Bertolotto; O Catalano; M Claudon; D A Clevert; J M Correas; M D'Onofrio; F M Drudi; J Eyding; M Giovannini; M Hocke; A Ignee; E M Jung; A S Klauser; N Lassau; E Leen; G Mathis; A Saftoiu; G Seidel; P S Sidhu; G ter Haar; D Timmerman; H P Weskott Journal: Ultraschall Med Date: 2011-08-26 Impact factor: 6.548
Authors: Antonio De Franco; Alessandra Di Veronica; Alessandro Armuzzi; Italia Roberto; Manuela Marzo; Barbara De Pascalis; Italo De Vitis; Alfredo Papa; Enrico Bock; Francesco M Danza; Lorenzo Bonomo; Luisa Guidi Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-12-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Damian J M Tolan; Rebecca Greenhalgh; Ian A Zealley; Steve Halligan; Stuart A Taylor Journal: Radiographics Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Tomás Ripollés; María J Martínez-Pérez; Esther Blanc; Fructuoso Delgado; José Vizuete; José M Paredes; José Vilar Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2011-08-10
Authors: Ami Gokli; Jonathan R Dillman; Paul D Humphries; Damjana Ključevšek; Hans-Joachim Mentzel; Erika Rubesova; Marcelo S Takahashi; Sudha A Anupindi Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2021-05-12