Literature DB >> 18214582

Assessment of the extension and the inflammatory activity in Crohn's disease: comparison of ultrasound and MRI.

María J Martínez1, Tomás Ripollés, José M Paredes, Esther Blanc, Luis Martí-Bonmatí.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective study was twofold: to examine the efficacy of MRI and sonography in the assessment of Crohn's disease (CD) activity in comparison with clinical scoring and biologic tests and to compare both techniques in the evaluation of extension and transmural complications.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty patients with histologically proven Crohn's disease were prospectively examined the same day first with sonography and after MRI. Sonographic exam included evaluation of bowel wall thickness, vascularity pattern, and perienteric changes. Thirty minutes prior to MRI imaging, patients were given 250 mL of dilute sodium phosphate solution and additional 750 mL of water orally. MRI images evaluation included bowel wall thickening, bowel wall enhancement, and perienteric changes. The gastrointestinal tract was divided into five segments. Findings and extension of the both techniques were verified by means of barium studies, surgery, or/and colonoscopy. The sonographic and MR findings were compared with clinical and laboratory data.
RESULTS: About 53 of 119 (45%) bowel segments showed pathological changes in gold standard tests. Sonography was superior to MRI in the localization of affected bowel segments (sensitivity: US 91%; MRI 83%; intertechniques agreement, kappa: 0.905) and in recognizing transmural complications (sensitivity: US 80%; MRI 72%), although significant differences were not found (p > 0.05). A statistically significant correlation between color Doppler flow and MR bowel wall enhancement (segment-by-segment analysis and per patient analysis; p > 0.5), and between perienteric changes in both techniques (p > 0.5) were found. Wall thickness measured on sonography was significantly greater in the group of patients with clinical activity (p = 0.023) or with clinical-biologic activity (p = 0.024). Grades of hyperemia and MR contrast enhancement of patients with clinical-biologic activity was higher than in patients without clinical-biologic activity (p = 0.019; p = 0.023).
CONCLUSION: In summary, both ultrasound and MRI are sensitive to localize the affected bowel segments and to detect transmural complications in patients with Crohn's disease. A significant correlation between color Doppler flow and bowel wall enhancement on MRI was found. Sonographic wall thickness, color Doppler flow, and bowel wall enhancement on MRI are related with clinical or biologic activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18214582     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-008-9365-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  29 in total

1.  Prospective cohort study of ultrasound-ultrasound and ultrasound-MR enterography agreement in the evaluation of pediatric small bowel Crohn disease.

Authors:  Jonathan R Dillman; Ethan A Smith; Ramon Sanchez; Michael A DiPietro; Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; Jeremy Adler; Vera DeMatos-Maillard; Shokoufeh Khalatbari; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-12-30

2.  Detecting inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease - how does ultrasound compare to magnetic resonance enterography using standardised scoring systems?

Authors:  Joy L Barber; Alexsandra Zambrano-Perez; Øystein E Olsen; Fevronia Kiparissi; Mila Baycheva; Daniela Knaflez; Neil Shah; Tom A Watson
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-04-13

3.  Conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluating the severity of Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Chang Liu; Xiao-Rong Xu; Hui-Xiong Xu; Zhan-Ju Liu; Yi-Feng Zhang; Li-Ping Sun; Jun-Mei Xu; Lin-Na Liu; Le-Hang Guo; Xiao-Wan Bo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-01-15

4.  Usefulness of transabdominal ultrasonography for assessing ulcerative colitis: a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  Kenji Kinoshita; Takehiko Katsurada; Mutsumi Nishida; Satomi Omotehara; Reizo Onishi; Katsuhiro Mabe; Aki Onodera; Mami Sato; Kazunori Eto; Mitsutoshi Suya; Atsuo Maemoto; Toru Hasegawa; Junji Yamamoto; Daiki Mitsumori; Shinji Yoshii; Kota Ono; Naoya Sakamoto
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Magnetic resonance enterography findings of a gastrocolic fistula in Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Sanne N van Munster; Mark F J Stolk; Karel C Kuypers; Rene Wiezer; Thomas L Bollen
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-08

Review 6.  Chronic inflammatory diseases of the bowel: diagnosis and follow-up.

Authors:  Guillaume Gorincour; Audrey Aschero; Catherine Desvignes; François Portier; Brigitte Bourlière-Najean; Alix Ruocco-Angari; Philippe Devred; Nathalie Colavolpe; Bertrand Roquelaure; Arnaud Delarue; Philippe Petit
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-04-30

Review 7.  Current best practice for disease activity assessment in IBD.

Authors:  Alissa J Walsh; Robert V Bryant; Simon P L Travis
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 46.802

8.  Comparison of high-resolution ultrasound and MR-enterography in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Andreas G Schreyer; Cynthia Menzel; Chris Friedrich; Florian Poschenrieder; Lukas Egger; Christian Dornia; Gabriela Schill; Lena M Dendl; Doris Schacherer; Christl Girlich; Ernst-Michael Jung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Surgery and diagnostic imaging in abdominal Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Fiorenzo Botti; Flavio Caprioli; Diego Pettinari; Alberto Carrara; Andrea Magarotto; Ettore Contessini Avesani
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2013-10-16

10.  Assessment of activity of Crohn's disease of the ileum and large bowel: proposal for a new multiparameter MR enterography score.

Authors:  L Macarini; L P Stoppino; A Centola; S Muscarella; F Fortunato; F Coppolino; N Della Valle; V Ierardi; P Milillo; R Vinci
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 3.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.