| Literature DB >> 23304495 |
J-Gonzalo Ocejo-Vinyals1, Lucía Lavín-Alconero, Pablo Sánchez-Velasco, M-Ángeles Guerrero-Alonso, Fernando Ausín, M-Carmen Fariñas, Francisco Leyva-Cobián.
Abstract
Mannose-binding lectin is a central molecule of the innate immune system. Mannose-binding lectin 2 promoter polymorphisms and structural variants have been associated with susceptibility to tuberculosis. However, contradictory results among different populations have been reported, resulting in no convincing evidence of association between mannose-binding lectin 2 and susceptibility to tuberculosis. For this reason, we conducted a study in a well genetically conserved Spanish population in order to shed light on this controversial association. We analysed the six promoter and structural mannose-binding lectin 2 gene variants in 107 patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and 441 healthy controls. Only D variant and HYPD haplotype were significantly more frequents in controls which would indicate that this allele could confer protection against pulmonary tuberculosis, but this difference disappeared after statistical correction. Neither the rest of alleles nor the haplotypes were significantly associated with the disease. These results would indicate that mannose-binding lectin promoter polymorphisms and gene variants would not be associated with an increased risk to pulmonary tuberculosis. Despite the slight trend of the D allele and HYPD haplotype in conferring protection against pulmonary tuberculosis, susceptibility to this disease would probably be due to other genetic factors, at least in our population.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23304495 PMCID: PMC3529500 DOI: 10.1155/2012/469128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pulm Med ISSN: 2090-1844
Allelic frequencies of MBL2 structural variants and promoter polymorphisms in healthy controls and patients with pulmonary tuberculosis.
| Structural variants | Promoter polymorphisms | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | L | H | Y | X | P | Q | |
| Controls | ||||||||||
| ( | 0.782 | 0.143 | 0.008 |
| 0.655 | 0.345 | 0.760 | 0.240 | 0.815 | 0.195 |
| PTB Patients | ||||||||||
| ( | 0.836 | 0.131 | 0.009 |
| 0.678 | 0.322 | 0.776 | 0.224 | 0.757 | 0.243 |
|
|
| |||||||||
| OR |
| |||||||||
| (95% CI) |
| |||||||||
aOnly D variant showed significant differences between the two groups. The rest of structural and promoter alleles did not show significant differences.
bThe study had 74% power for detecting an odds ratio (OR) ≥ 2.
Frequency of MBL2 haplotypes in controls and PTB patients from Cantabria compared with other previously reported populations.
| Haplotype | Population | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls | PTB | CAN | ESK | DAN | JAP | KEN | MOZ | CHIR | MAP | WAR | |
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | |
| HYPA | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.24 | 0.81 | 0.31 | 0.44 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.54 | 0.38 | 0.75 |
| LYQA | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.01 |
| LYPA | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.30 | 0.02 | 0.08 | 0.23 |
| LXPA | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.03 | 0.26 | 0.11 | 0.24 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| LYPB | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0 |
| LYQC | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0 | 0.03 | 0 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0 | 0.04 | 0 |
| HYPD | 0.07 |
| 0.07 | 0 | 0.06 | 0 | 0.04 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.003 |
|
| |||||||||||
| Hb | 0.81 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.33 | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.76 | 0.54 | 0.66 | 0.39 |
Controls, healthy population from Cantabria, PTB, patients with pulmonary tuberculosis from Cantabria, CAN, and Gran Canaria p; ESK, Eskimo; DAN, Danish; JAP, Japanese; KEN, Kenya; MOZ, Mozambique; CHIR, Chiriguano (South America); MAP, Mapuche (South America); WAR, Warlpiri (Australia) populations.
a P value 0.014 (OR 0.33 and 95% CI 0.13–0.84): frequency of HYPD haplotype in PTB patients versus control subjects from Cantabria.
bAverage heterozygosity of the seven alleles when they were considered together.
Frequencies of complete diplotypes in Spanish PTB patients and controls.
|
| PTB patients | Controls |
| OR | (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYQA/HYPA | 17 (15.9) | 54 (12.24) | 0.40 | 1.35 | (0.75–2.45) |
| LYQA/LYPB | 10 (9.3) | 29 (6.58) | 0.43 | 1.46 | (0.69–3.11) |
| LYQA/LYPA | 6 (5.6) | 19 (4.31) | 0.60 | 1.32 | (0.51–3.39) |
| LYQA/LYQA | 3 (2.8) | 19 (4.31) | 0.59 | 0.64 | (0.19–2.20) |
| LYQA/HYPD | 1 (0.9) | 10 (2.27) | 0.70 | 0.41 | (0.05–3.21) |
| LYQA/LYQC | 0 (0) | 2 (0.45) | 1.0 | NA | NA |
| LYQC/HYPD | 0 (0) | 1 (0.23) | 1.0 | NA | NA |
| LXPA/HYPA | 15 (14.0) | 45 (10.20) | 0.34 | 1.43 | (0.77–2.69) |
| LXPA/LYQA | 10 (9.3) | 53 (12.02) | 0.54 | 0.75 | (0.37–1.54) |
| LXPA/LXPA | 7 (6.5) | 14 (3.17) | 0.15 | 2.14 | (0.84–5.43) |
| LXPA/LYPB | 4 (3.7) | 31 (7.03) | 0.30 | 0.51 | (0.18–1.49) |
| LXPA/HYPD | 3 (2.8) | 13 (2.95) | 1.0 | 0.95 | (0.27–3.39) |
| LXPA/LYPA | 1 (0.9) | 10 (2.27) | 0.70 | 0.41 | (0.05–3.21) |
| LXPA/LYQC | 1 (0.9) | 2 (0.45) | 0.48 | 2.07 | (0.19–23.05) |
| HYPA/HYPA | 10 (9.3) | 38 (8.62) | 0.96 | 1.09 | (0.53–2.27) |
| LYPB/HYPA | 8 (7.5) | 38 (8.62) | 0.88 | 0.86 | (0.39–1.89) |
| LYPB/LYPB | 1 (0.9) | 7 (1.59) | 1.0 | 0.58 | (0.07–4.81) |
| LYPB/LYQC | 1 (0.9) | 1 (0.23) | 0.35 | 4.15 | (0.26–66.90) |
| LYPB/HYPD | 0 (0) | 9 (2.04) | 0.22 | NA | NA |
| LYPA/HYPA | 4 (3.7) | 18 (4.08) | 1.0 | 0.91 | (1.30–2.75) |
| LYPA/LYPB | 3 (2.8) | 4 (0.91) | 0.14 | 3.15 | (0.69–14.30) |
| LYPA/LYPA | 1 (0.9) | 2 (0.45) | 0.48 | 2.07 | (0.19–23.05) |
| LYPA/LYQC | 0 (0) | 1 (0.23) | 1.0 | NA | NA |
| LYPA/HYPD | 1 (0.9) | 2 (0.45) | 0.48 | 2.07 | (0.19–23.05) |
| HYPD/HYPA | 0 (0) | 14 (3.17) | 0.08 | NA | NA |
| HYPD/HYPD | 0 (0) | 5 (1.13) | 0.59 | NA | NA |
∗Frequencies of the rest of combined diplotypes (LYQC/HYPA, LYQC/LYQC) were 0 in both groups.