Literature DB >> 9778440

Risky choice and Weber's Law.

A Kacelnik1, F Brito e Abreu.   

Abstract

We present a family of models of choice between behavioural alternatives with stochastic outcomes (risky choice) based on the effects of Weber's Law in memory. These models generalise and extend a model of risk sensitive foraging originally proposed by Reboreda & Kacelnik [(1991) Behav. Ecol. 2, 301-308], which yielded qualitative predictions (risk-aversion for amount of food and risk-proneness for delay to food). We now demonstrate how this approach can predict quantitatively the partial preferences between two alternative options with any mean and variance in their outcomes, and the certainty equivalent of an option consisting of any set of probabilistic outcomes. The approach is also relevant to the economics and psychology of risk sensitivity because it predicts risk aversion for any desirable outcome (such as monetary gains) and risk seeking for any undesirable gain (such as monetary losses). Our models are process-based rather than purely normative, and are based on linear expected utility as a function of expected outcomes. They do not account for all observed aspects of risky choice, but their descriptive performance betters that of existing functional models and requires fewer parameters. Copyright 1998 Academic Press Limited

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9778440     DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  19 in total

1.  Temporal discounting predicts risk sensitivity in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Hayden; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  The role of beginner's luck in learning to prefer risky patches by socially foraging house sparrows.

Authors:  Tomer Ilan; Edith Katsnelson; Uzi Motro; Marcus W Feldman; Arnon Lotem
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.671

3.  Cognitive influences on risk-seeking by rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Hayden; Sarah R Heilbronner; Amrita C Nair; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Judgm Decis Mak       Date:  2008-06-01

4.  Affective perception of Euro banknotes: cognitive factors and interindividual differences.

Authors:  Valerio Manippa; Felice Giuliani; Alfredo Brancucci; Luca Tommasi; Riccardo Palumbo; Davide Pietroni
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-08-31

5.  The psychophysics of uneconomical choice: non-linear reward evaluation by a nectar feeder.

Authors:  Vladislav Nachev; York Winter
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Framing effects and risky decisions in starlings.

Authors:  Barnaby Marsh; Alex Kacelnik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The psychophysics of sugar concentration discrimination and contrast evaluation in bumblebees.

Authors:  Vladislav Nachev; James D Thomson; York Winter
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Transient activation of midbrain dopamine neurons by reward risk.

Authors:  C D Fiorillo
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Scalar utility theory and proportional processing: What does it actually imply?

Authors:  Tom Rosenström; Karoline Wiesner; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Systemic administration of 8-OH-DPAT and eticlopride, but not SCH23390, alters loss-chasing behavior in the rat.

Authors:  Robert D Rogers; Adeline Wong; Chris McKinnon; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 7.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.