Literature DB >> 23302471

Patient-induced susceptibility effect on geometric distortion of clinical brain MRI for radiation treatment planning on a 3T scanner.

H Wang1, J Balter, Y Cao.   

Abstract

Concerns about the geometric accuracy of MRI in radiation therapy (RT) have been present since its invention. Although modern scanners typically have system levels of geometric accuracy that meet requirements of RT, subject-specific distortion is variable, and methods to in vivo assess and control patient-induced geometric distortion are not yet resolved. This study investigated the nature and magnitude of the subject-induced susceptibility effect on geometric distortions in clinical brain MRI, and tested the feasibility of in vivo quality control using field inhomogeneity mapping. For 19 consecutive patients scanned on a dedicated 3T MR scanner, B0 field inhomogeneity maps were acquired and analyzed to determine subject-induced distortions. For 3D T1 weighted images frequency-encoded with a bandwidth of 180 Hz/pixel, 86.9% of the estimated displacements were <0.5 mm, 97.4% <1 mm, and only 0.1% of displacements > 2 mm. The maximum displacement was <4 mm. The greatest distortions were observed at the interfaces with air at the sinuses. Displacements decayed to less than 1 mm over a distance of 8 mm. Metal surgical wires generated smaller distortions, with an averaged maximum displacement of 0.76 mm. Repeat acquisition of the field maps in 17 patients revealed a within-subject standard deviation of 0.25 ppm, equivalent to 0.22 mm displacement in the frequency-encoding direction in the 3D T1 weighted images. Susceptibility-induced voxel displacements in the brain are generally small, but should be monitored for precision RT. These effects are manageable at 3T and lower fields, and the methods applied can be used to monitor for potential local errors in individual patients, as well as to correct for local distortions as needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23302471     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/3/465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  32 in total

1.  Characterization of hardware-related spatial distortions for IR-PETRA pulse sequence using a brain specific phantom.

Authors:  Sima Ahmadian; Iraj Jabbari; Seyed Mehdi Bagherimofidi; Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  MR-guided radiation therapy: transformative technology and its role in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Yue Cao; Chia-Lin Tseng; James M Balter; Feifei Teng; Hemant A Parmar; Arjun Sahgal
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance image guidance in external beam radiation therapy planning and delivery.

Authors:  Ilamurugu Arivarasan; Chandrasekaran Anuradha; Shanmuga Subramanian; Ayyalusamy Anantharaman; Velayudham Ramasubramanian
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Multiatlas approach with local registration goodness weighting for MRI-based electron density mapping of head and neck anatomy.

Authors:  Reza Farjam; Neelam Tyagi; Harini Veeraraghavan; Aditya Apte; Kristen Zakian; Margie A Hunt; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Large field of view distortion assessment in a low-field MR-linac.

Authors:  Siamak P Nejad-Davarani; Joshua P Kim; Dongsu Du; Carri Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Robust Estimation of Electron Density From Anatomic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain Using a Unifying Multi-Atlas Approach.

Authors:  Shangjie Ren; Wendy Hara; Lei Wang; Mark K Buyyounouski; Quynh-Thu Le; Lei Xing; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  MRI-based treatment planning with pseudo CT generated through atlas registration.

Authors:  Jinsoo Uh; Thomas E Merchant; Yimei Li; Xingyu Li; Chiaho Hua
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Amir M Owrangi; Peter B Greer; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Distortion inherent to magnetic resonance imaging can lead to geometric miss in radiosurgery planning.

Authors:  Tyler M Seibert; Nathan S White; Gwe-Ya Kim; Vitali Moiseenko; Carrie R McDonald; Nikdokht Farid; Hauke Bartsch; Joshua Kuperman; Roshan Karunamuni; Deborah Marshall; Dominic Holland; Parag Sanghvi; Daniel R Simpson; Arno J Mundt; Anders M Dale; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01

10.  Image Guided Radiation Therapy Using Synthetic Computed Tomography Images in Brain Cancer.

Authors:  Ryan G Price; Joshua P Kim; Weili Zheng; Indrin J Chetty; Carri Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.