BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the seventh edition of the tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system to the sixth edition to validate its usefulness in predicting prognosis for gallbladder cancer. METHODS: Gallbladder cancer patients were staged according to both the sixth and seventh editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients underwent cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer. According to the seventh edition, the survival time of N1 and N2 was different (P = 0.006), and the survival difference between N0 and N1 became significant after excluding cases with no lymph node dissection (P = 0.035). The -2 log likelihoods of the sixth and seventh edition TNM stages were 216.282 and 217.460, respectively, suggesting non-superiority of the seventh edition. Excluding cases with no lymph node dissection resulted in a lower -2 log likelihood score for both editions (sixth, 157.002; seventh, 158.758). CONCLUSIONS: Sufficient lymph node dissection allows better prognostic stratification by application of the AJCC staging system. Even though the new N stage of the seventh edition showed some improvement in predicting prognosis, the overall performance of the seventh edition was not much better than the sixth. Further improvement is needed in the gallbladder cancer staging system.
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the seventh edition of the tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system to the sixth edition to validate its usefulness in predicting prognosis for gallbladder cancer. METHODS:Gallbladder cancerpatients were staged according to both the sixth and seventh editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients underwent cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer. According to the seventh edition, the survival time of N1 and N2 was different (P = 0.006), and the survival difference between N0 and N1 became significant after excluding cases with no lymph node dissection (P = 0.035). The -2 log likelihoods of the sixth and seventh edition TNM stages were 216.282 and 217.460, respectively, suggesting non-superiority of the seventh edition. Excluding cases with no lymph node dissection resulted in a lower -2 log likelihood score for both editions (sixth, 157.002; seventh, 158.758). CONCLUSIONS: Sufficient lymph node dissection allows better prognostic stratification by application of the AJCC staging system. Even though the new N stage of the seventh edition showed some improvement in predicting prognosis, the overall performance of the seventh edition was not much better than the sixth. Further improvement is needed in the gallbladder cancer staging system.
Authors: Hiromichi Ito; Kaori Ito; Michael D'Angelica; Mithat Gonen; David Klimstra; Peter Allen; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; Leslie H Blumgart; William R Jarnagin Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Katharina Cziupka; Lars Ivo Partecke; Lutz Mirow; Claus-Dieter Heidecke; Christian Emde; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Ulrike Siewert; Neeltje van den Berg; Wolfram von Bernstorff; Albrecht Stier Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2012-03-28 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Eric H Jensen; Anasooya Abraham; Elizabeth B Habermann; Waddah B Al-Refaie; Selwyn M Vickers; Beth A Virnig; Todd M Tuttle Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-12-13 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Stefan Buettner; Georgios Antonios Margonis; Yuhree Kim; Faiz Gani; Cecilia G Ethun; George A Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles R Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-08-05 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Neda Amini; Yuhree Kim; Ana Wilson; Georgios Antonios Margonis; Cecilia G Ethun; George Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Faiz Gani; Stefan Buettner; Georgios A Margonis; Cecilia G Ethun; George Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Universe Leung; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Carlos U Corvera; Michael I D'Angelica; Peter J Allen; T Peter Kingham; Ronald P DeMatteo; William R Jarnagin; Yuman Fong Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2014-06-04 Impact factor: 3.647