Literature DB >> 20077022

Number of positive lymph nodes independently determines the prognosis after resection in patients with gallbladder carcinoma.

Jun Sakata1, Yoshio Shirai, Toshifumi Wakai, Yoichi Ajioka, Katsuyoshi Hatakeyama.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to compare the prognostic power of the location of positive lymph nodes with that of the number of positive lymph nodes in gallbladder carcinoma.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 116 consecutive patients who underwent an R0 radical resection for gallbladder carcinoma. A total of 2,406 lymph nodes taken from the patients were examined histologically. The location of positive regional nodes was classified according to the Japanese staging system. The number of positive regional nodes was recorded for each patient.
RESULTS: Nodal disease was found in 49 patients, of whom 19 survived for more than 5 years after resection. Univariate analysis revealed that both the location (P < 0.0001) and the number (P < 0.0001) of positive nodes were significant prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of positive nodes was an independent prognostic factor (P < 0.001), whereas the location of positive nodes failed to remain as an independent variable. The cumulative 5-year survival rates were 81% for patients without regional nodal disease, 62% for patients with a single positive node, 43% for patients with 2-3 positive nodes, and 15% for patients with > or =4 positive nodes (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The number, not the location, of positive lymph nodes independently determines the prognosis after resection in gallbladder carcinoma. No nodal disease or a single positive node indicates a favorable outcome after resection, whereas radical lymph node dissection is effective for selected patients with multiple positive nodes, provided that an R0 resection is feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20077022     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0899-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  23 in total

Review 1.  Key factors influencing prognosis in relation to gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Charles Henry Caldow Pilgrim; Ryan T Groeschl; Kiran K Turaga; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Extended Lymphadenectomy Is Required for Incidental Gallbladder Cancer Independent of Cystic Duct Lymph Node Status.

Authors:  Eduardo A Vega; Eduardo Vinuela; Suguru Yamashita; Marcel Sanhueza; Gabriel Cavada; Cristian Diaz; Thomas A Aloia; Yun Shin Chun; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Masayuki Okuno; Claire Goumard; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Jeffrey E Lee; Claudius Conrad
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Lymph nodal involvement as prognostic factor in gallbladder cancer: location, count or ratio?

Authors:  Sanjay Singh Negi; Amanjeet Singh; Adarsh Chaudhary
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Risk factors of lymphatic metastasis complement poor radiological detection in gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Tu-Nan Yu; Bo Shen; Ning Meng; Hong Yu; Xiu-Jun Cai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Surgico-pathological Outcomes of 148 Radical Cholecystectomies Using Systematic Regional Lymphadenectomy Protocol: a Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Durgatosh Pandey; Pankaj Kumar Garg; Ashish Jakhetiya; Neelesh Jain; Shreyash Rai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2018-06

6.  Comparison of different lymph node staging schemes in prostate cancer patients with lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Shengming Jin; Junjie Wang; Yijun Shen; Hualei Gan; Peihang Xu; Yu Wei; Jiaming Wei; Junlong Wu; Beihe Wang; Jun Wang; Chen Yang; Yao Zhu; Dingwei Ye
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Prognostic Implications of Lymph Node Status for Patients With Gallbladder Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Neda Amini; Yuhree Kim; Ana Wilson; Georgios Antonios Margonis; Cecilia G Ethun; George Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Comparison of the sixth and seventh editions of the AJCC TNM classification for gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Tak Geun Oh; Moon Jae Chung; Seungmin Bang; Seung Woo Park; Jae Bok Chung; Si Young Song; Gi Hong Choi; Kyung Sik Kim; Woo Jung Lee; Jeong Youp Park
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Lymph node status after resection for gallbladder adenocarcinoma: prognostic implications of different nodal staging/scoring systems.

Authors:  Neda Amini; Gaya Spolverato; Yuhree Kim; Rohan Gupta; Georgios Antonios Margonis; Aslam Ejaz; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Radical lymph node dissection and assessment: Impact on gallbladder cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Gui-Jie Liu; Xue-Hua Li; Yan-Xin Chen; Hui-Dong Sun; Gui-Mei Zhao; San-Yuan Hu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.