INTRODUCTION: Gallbladder cancer is the most common malignant tumour of the biliary system with an extraordinarily poor prognosis. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated forty-two patients with histologically proven gallbladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Estimated survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were assessed using the logrank test. The GKR (combined registry of cancer) and demographic data were used to gain information on community cancer statistics. RESULTS: In this study, patients with metastases showed poorer survival rates. Furthermore, the survival was significantly better in patients with R0 resections, smaller tumour sizes and without lymph node infiltration. T stage, M stage and R stage were independent prognostic parameters. Sex and age had no significant effect on survival. Also, we found that patients with incidental gallbladder cancer and those with cholecystolithiasis showed significantly better survival rates. Demographic analyses of the study group confirmed a high coverage of our institution for incident cases in our catchment area and no significant regional deviations from the expected incidence of gallbladder cancer. CONCLUSION: Despite differences in the incidence in different geographical areas, gallbladder cancer appears to be fairly normally distributed in Western Pomerania, a predominantly rural area of Northeastern Germany. Coverage of incident cases in our catchment area was high. T stage, M stage and R stage were independent prognostic factors in our study. We conclude that, whenever possible, an R0 resection should be the surgical goal in all patients staged resectable before surgery, but heroic resections in patients with highly advanced cancer disease or severe accompanying non-tumour diseases are not warranted.
INTRODUCTION:Gallbladder cancer is the most common malignant tumour of the biliary system with an extraordinarily poor prognosis. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated forty-two patients with histologically proven gallbladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Estimated survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were assessed using the logrank test. The GKR (combined registry of cancer) and demographic data were used to gain information on community cancer statistics. RESULTS: In this study, patients with metastases showed poorer survival rates. Furthermore, the survival was significantly better in patients with R0 resections, smaller tumour sizes and without lymph node infiltration. T stage, M stage and R stage were independent prognostic parameters. Sex and age had no significant effect on survival. Also, we found that patients with incidental gallbladder cancer and those with cholecystolithiasis showed significantly better survival rates. Demographic analyses of the study group confirmed a high coverage of our institution for incident cases in our catchment area and no significant regional deviations from the expected incidence of gallbladder cancer. CONCLUSION: Despite differences in the incidence in different geographical areas, gallbladder cancer appears to be fairly normally distributed in Western Pomerania, a predominantly rural area of Northeastern Germany. Coverage of incident cases in our catchment area was high. T stage, M stage and R stage were independent prognostic factors in our study. We conclude that, whenever possible, an R0 resection should be the surgical goal in all patients staged resectable before surgery, but heroic resections in patients with highly advanced cancer disease or severe accompanying non-tumour diseases are not warranted.
Authors: H Shimada; I Endo; Y Fujii; N Kamiya; H Masunari; O Kunihiro; K Tanaka; K Misuta; S Togo Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Jason M Foster; Hisakazu Hoshi; John F Gibbs; Renuka Iyer; Miland Javle; Quyen Chu; Boris Kuvshinoff Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2006-11-11 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Hiromichi Ito; Evan Matros; David C Brooks; Robert T Osteen; Michael J Zinner; Richard S Swanson; Stanley W Ashley; Edward E Whang Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Cecilia G Ethun; Nina Le; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; Timothy M Pawlik; George Poultsides; Thuy Tran; Kamran Idrees; Chelsea A Isom; Ryan C Fields; Bradley A Krasnick; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Robert C G Martin; Charles R Scoggins; Perry Shen; Harveshp D Mogal; Carl Schmidt; Eliza Beal; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; Maria C Russell; Shishir K Maithel Journal: Am Surg Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Woohyung Lee; Chi-Young Jeong; Young Hoon Kim; Young Hoon Roh; Myung Hee Yoon; Hyung Il Seo; Jeong-Ik Park; Bo-Hyun Jung; Dong Hoon Shin; Young Il Choi; Je Ho Ryu; Kwang Ho Yang; Chang Soo Choi; Yo-Han Park; Yang Won Nah; Soon-Chan Hong Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2019-08-14 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Tak Geun Oh; Moon Jae Chung; Seungmin Bang; Seung Woo Park; Jae Bok Chung; Si Young Song; Gi Hong Choi; Kyung Sik Kim; Woo Jung Lee; Jeong Youp Park Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Andrea Cavallaro; Gaetano Piccolo; Vincenzo Panebianco; Emanuele Lo Menzo; Massimiliano Berretta; Antonio Zanghì; Maria Di Vita; Alessandro Cappellani Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 5.742