BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery results in bone loss at weight-bearing sites, the mechanism of which is unknown. METHODS: Twenty-two women (mean body mass index 44 kg/m(2); aged 45 years) who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 14) and restrictive procedures (n = 8) had measurements of areal bone mineral density by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine, total hip (TH), femoral neck (FN), and one third radius and trabecular and cortical volumetric bone mineral density and microstructure at the distal radius and tibia by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) at baseline and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Mean weight loss was 28 ± 3 kg (P < .0001). PTH rose 23% (P < .02) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D was stable. C-telopeptide increased by 144% (P < .001). Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase did not change. Areal bone mineral density declined at TH (-5.2%; P < .005) and FN (-4.5%; P < .005). By HR-pQCT, trabecular parameters were stable, whereas cortical bone deteriorated, particularly at the tibia: cortical area (-2.7%; P < .01); cortical thickness (-2.1%; P < .01); total density (-1.3%; P = .059); cortical density (-1.7%; P < .01). In multivariate regression, bone loss at the TH and FN were predicted by weight loss. In contrast, only PTH increase predicted cortical deterioration at the tibia. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients lost more weight, had more bone loss by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and HR-pQCT than those with restrictive procedures, and had declines in cortical load share estimated by finite element analysis. CONCLUSIONS: After bariatric surgery, hip bone loss reflects skeletal unloading and cortical bone loss reflects secondary hyperparathyroidism. This study highlights deterioration of cortical bone loss as a novel mechanism for bone loss after bariatric surgery.
BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery results in bone loss at weight-bearing sites, the mechanism of which is unknown. METHODS: Twenty-two women (mean body mass index 44 kg/m(2); aged 45 years) who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 14) and restrictive procedures (n = 8) had measurements of areal bone mineral density by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine, total hip (TH), femoral neck (FN), and one third radius and trabecular and cortical volumetric bone mineral density and microstructure at the distal radius and tibia by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) at baseline and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Mean weight loss was 28 ± 3 kg (P < .0001). PTH rose 23% (P < .02) and 25-hydroxyvitamin D was stable. C-telopeptide increased by 144% (P < .001). Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase did not change. Areal bone mineral density declined at TH (-5.2%; P < .005) and FN (-4.5%; P < .005). By HR-pQCT, trabecular parameters were stable, whereas cortical bone deteriorated, particularly at the tibia: cortical area (-2.7%; P < .01); cortical thickness (-2.1%; P < .01); total density (-1.3%; P = .059); cortical density (-1.7%; P < .01). In multivariate regression, bone loss at the TH and FN were predicted by weight loss. In contrast, only PTH increase predicted cortical deterioration at the tibia. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients lost more weight, had more bone loss by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and HR-pQCT than those with restrictive procedures, and had declines in cortical load share estimated by finite element analysis. CONCLUSIONS: After bariatric surgery, hip bone loss reflects skeletal unloading and cortical bone loss reflects secondary hyperparathyroidism. This study highlights deterioration of cortical bone loss as a novel mechanism for bone loss after bariatric surgery.
Authors: Juliet E Compston; Nelson B Watts; Roland Chapurlat; Cyrus Cooper; Steven Boonen; Susan Greenspan; Johannes Pfeilschifter; Stuart Silverman; Adolfo Díez-Pérez; Robert Lindsay; Kenneth G Saag; J Coen Netelenbos; Stephen Gehlbach; Frederick H Hooven; Julie Flahive; Jonathan D Adachi; Maurizio Rossini; Andrea Z Lacroix; Christian Roux; Philip N Sambrook; Ethel S Siris Journal: Am J Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Lars Sjöström; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Markku Peltonen; Jarl Torgerson; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Sven Dahlgren; Bo Larsson; Kristina Narbro; Carl David Sjöström; Marianne Sullivan; Hans Wedel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-12-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ego Seeman; Pierre D Delmas; David A Hanley; Deborah Sellmeyer; Angela M Cheung; Elizabeth Shane; Ann Kearns; Thierry Thomas; Steven K Boyd; Stephanie Boutroy; Cesar Bogado; Sharmila Majumdar; Michelle Fan; Cesar Libanati; Jose Zanchetta Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Penelope S Coates; John D Fernstrom; Madelyn H Fernstrom; Philip R Schauer; Susan L Greenspan Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: E M Stein; G Strain; N Sinha; D Ortiz; A Pomp; G Dakin; D J McMahon; R Bockman; S J Silverberg Journal: Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) Date: 2008-11-05 Impact factor: 3.478
Authors: Elaine W Yu; Mary L Bouxsein; Melissa S Putman; Elizabeth L Monis; Adam E Roy; Janey S A Pratt; W Scott Butsch; Joel S Finkelstein Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Anne L Schafer; Galateia J Kazakia; Eric Vittinghoff; Lygia Stewart; Stanley J Rogers; Tiffany Y Kim; Jonathan T Carter; Andrew M Posselt; Courtney Pasco; Dolores M Shoback; Dennis M Black Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 6.741