Literature DB >> 23294783

In-vitro performance of the Enlite Sensor in various glucose concentrations during hypobaric and hyperbaric conditions.

Peter Adolfsson1, Hans Ornhagen, Bengt M Eriksson, Raghavendhar Gautham, Johan Jendle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a need for reliable methods of glucose measurement in different environmental conditions. The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the performance of the Enlite® Sensor when connected to either the iPro™ Continuous Glucose Monitor recording device or the Guardian® REAL-Time transmitting device, in hypobaric and hyperbaric conditions.
METHODS: Sixteen sensors connected to eight iPro devices and eight Guardian REAL-Time devices were immersed in three beakers containing separate glucose concentrations: 52, 88, and 207 mg/dl (2.9, 4.9, and 11.3 mmol/liter). Two different pressure tests were conducted: a hypobaric test, corresponding to maximum 18000 ft/5500 m height, and a hyperbaric test, corresponding to maximum 100 ft/30 m depth. The linearity of the sensor signals in the different conditions was evaluated.
RESULTS: The sensors worked continuously, and the sensor signals were collected without interruption at all pressures tested. When comparing the input signals for glucose (ISIGs) and the different glucose concentrations during altered pressure, linearity (R(2)) of 0.98 was found. During the hypobaric test, significant differences (p < .005) were seen when comparing the ISIGs during varying pressure at two of the glucose concentrations (52 and 207 mg/dl), whereas no difference was seen at the 88 mg/dl glucose concentration. During the hyperbaric test, no differences were found.
CONCLUSIONS: The Enlite Sensors connected to either the iPro or the Guardian REAL-Time device provided values continuously. In hyperbaric conditions, no significant differences were seen during changes in ambient pressure; however, during hypobaric conditions, the ISIG was significantly different in the low and high glucose concentrations.
© 2012 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23294783      PMCID: PMC3570878          DOI: 10.1177/193229681200600617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  17 in total

Review 1.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 2.  Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth.

Authors:  William B Strong; Robert M Malina; Cameron J R Blimkie; Stephen R Daniels; Rodney K Dishman; Bernard Gutin; Albert C Hergenroeder; Aviva Must; Patricia A Nixon; James M Pivarnik; Thomas Rowland; Stewart Trost; François Trudeau
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Safety of recreational scuba diving in type 1 diabetic patients: the Deep Monitoring programme.

Authors:  M Bonomo; R Cairoli; G Verde; L Morelli; A Moreo; M Delle Grottaglie; M C Brambilla; E Meneghini; P Aghemo; G Corigliano; A Marroni
Journal:  Diabetes Metab       Date:  2009-02-28       Impact factor: 6.041

4.  Oxygen effects on glucose meter measurements with glucose dehydrogenase- and oxidase-based test strips for point-of-care testing.

Authors:  Z Tang; R F Louie; J H Lee; D M Lee; E E Miller; G J Kost
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Continuous glucose monitoring system during physical exercise in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  P Adolfsson; S Nilsson; B Lindblad
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 2.299

6.  Effect of high altitude on blood glucose meter performance.

Authors:  Kenneth S Fink; Dale B Christensen; Allan Ellsworth
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  Preventing exercise-induced hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes using real-time continuous glucose monitoring and a new carbohydrate intake algorithm: an observational field study.

Authors:  Michael C Riddell; Jill Milliken
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Glucose meter performance criteria for tight glycemic control estimated by simulation modeling.

Authors:  Brad S Karon; James C Boyd; George G Klee
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Extreme altitude mountaineering and Type 1 diabetes; the Diabetes Federation of Ireland Kilimanjaro Expedition.

Authors:  K Moore; N Vizzard; C Coleman; J McMahon; R Hayes; C J Thompson
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.359

10.  Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Tadej Battelino; Moshe Phillip; Natasa Bratina; Revital Nimri; Per Oskarsson; Jan Bolinder
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring of Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Brynn E Marks; Joseph I Wolfsdorf
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 5.555

2.  Practical aspects of diabetes technology use: Continuous glucose monitors, insulin pumps, and automated insulin delivery systems.

Authors:  Brynn E Marks; Kristen M Williams; Jordan S Sherwood; Melissa S Putman
Journal:  J Clin Transl Endocrinol       Date:  2021-12-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.