Literature DB >> 11378622

Oxygen effects on glucose meter measurements with glucose dehydrogenase- and oxidase-based test strips for point-of-care testing.

Z Tang1, R F Louie, J H Lee, D M Lee, E E Miller, G J Kost.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of different oxygen tensions (Po2) on glucose measurements with glucose dehydrogenase (GD)-based and glucose oxidase (GO)-based test strips, to quantitate changes in glucose measurements observed with different Po2 levels, and to discuss the potential risks of oxygen-derived glucose errors in critical care.
DESIGN: Venous blood from healthy volunteers was tonometered to create different oxygen tensions simulating patient arterial Po2 levels. Venous blood from diabetic patients was exposed to air to alter oxygen tensions simulating changes in Po2 during sample handling. Whole-blood glucose measurements obtained from these samples with six glucose meters were compared with reference analyzer plasma glucose measurements. Glucose differences were plotted vs. different Po2 levels to identify error trends. Error tolerances were as follows: a) within +/-15 mg/dL of the reference measurement for glucose levels <or=100 mg/dL; and b) within +/-15% of the reference measurement for glucose levels >100 mg/dL. SETTING AND
SUBJECTS: Five healthy volunteers in the bench study and 11 diabetic patients in the clinical study.
RESULTS: In the bench study, increases in Po2 levels decreased glucose measured with GO-based amperometric test strips, mainly at Po2 levels >100 torr. At nearly constant glucose concentrations, glucose meter systems showed large variations at low (39 torr) vs. high (396 torr) Po2 levels. Glucose measured with GD-based amperometric and GO-based photometric test strips generally were within error tolerances. In the clinical study, 31.6% (Precision PCx), 20.2% (Precision QID), and 23.0% (Glucometer Elite) of glucose measurements with GO-based amperometric test strips, 14.3% (SureStep) of glucose measurements with GO-based photometric test strips, and 4.6% (Accu-Chek Advantage H) and 5.9% (Accu-Chek Comfort Curve) of glucose measurements with GD-based amperometric test strips were out of the error tolerances.
CONCLUSIONS: Different oxygen tensions do not significantly affect glucose measured with the GD-based amperometric test strips, and have minimal effect on GO-based photometric test strips. Increases in oxygen tension lowered glucose measured with GO-based amperometric test strips. We recommend that the effects of different oxygen tensions in blood samples on glucose measurements be minimized by using oxygen-independent test strips for point-of-care glucose testing in critically ill and other patients with high or unpredictable blood Po2 levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11378622     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200105000-00038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  41 in total

1.  Impact of high altitudes on glucose control.

Authors:  Johan Jendle; Peter Adolfsson
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

Review 2.  Engineered proteins: redox properties and their applications.

Authors:  Shradha Prabhulkar; Hui Tian; Xiaotang Wang; Jun-Jie Zhu; Chen-Zhong Li
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 8.401

3.  Toward an injectable continuous osmotic glucose sensor.

Authors:  Erik Johannessen; Olga Krushinitskaya; Andrey Sokolov; Häfliger Philipp; Arno Hoogerwerf; Christian Hinderling; Kari Kautio; Jaakko Lenkkeri; Esko Strömmer; Vasily Kondratyev; Tor Inge Tønnessen; Tom Eirik Mollnes; Henrik Jakobsen; Even Zimmer; Bengt Akselsen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01

4.  Evaluation of different POCT devices for glucose measurement in a clinical neonatal setting.

Authors:  Matthias Roth-Kleiner; Corinne Stadelmann Diaw; Jocelyne Urfer; Christiane Ruffieux; Dominique Werner
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Evaluation of the Abbot FreeStyle Optium Neo H blood glucose meter in the hyperbaric oxygen environment.

Authors:  Carol R Baines; P David Cooper; Geraldine A O'Rourke; Charne Miller
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 0.887

6.  Impact of Glucose Meter Error on Glycemic Variability and Time in Target Range During Glycemic Control After Cardiovascular Surgery.

Authors:  Brad S Karon; Jeffrey W Meeusen; Sandra C Bryant
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-25

7.  Accuracy of bedside capillary blood glucose measurements in critically ill patients.

Authors:  C Dana Critchell; Vincent Savarese; Amy Callahan; Christine Aboud; Serge Jabbour; Paul Marik
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Comparative Accuracy of 17 Point-of-Care Glucose Meters.

Authors:  Laya Ekhlaspour; Debbie Mondesir; Norman Lautsch; Courtney Balliro; Mallory Hillard; Kendra Magyar; Laura Goergen Radocchia; Aryan Esmaeili; Manasi Sinha; Steven J Russell
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-03

9.  Thermal stress and point-of-care testing performance: suitability of glucose test strips and blood gas cartridges for disaster response.

Authors:  Richard F Louie; Stephanie L Sumner; Shaunyé Belcher; Ron Mathew; Nam K Tran; Gerald J Kost
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.385

10.  Assessment of insulin sensitivity during hyperbaric oxygen treatment.

Authors:  David Wilkinson; Suzy Szekely; Brian Gue; Charmaine S Tam; Ian Chapman; Leonie K Heilbronn
Journal:  Diving Hyperb Med       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 0.887

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.