Literature DB >> 23293217

Reproductive decision-making in young female carriers of a BRCA mutation.

L S Donnelly1, M Watson, C Moynihan, E Bancroft, D G R Evans, R Eeles, S Lavery, E Ormondroyd.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: How do young women, who were identified as carrying a BRCA gene mutation before they had children, approach reproductive decision-making and what are their attitudes towards reproductive genetic testing? SUMMARY ANSWER: Reproductive decision-making within the context of cancer risk is complex and influenced by personal experiences of cancer. Younger women were not concerned with reproductive decision-making at the time of their genetic test; however, the impact on subsequent reproductive decision-making was considerable and left them with unanticipated dilemmas, such as having children who would be at risk of inheriting cancer predisposition, timing risk-reducing surgery and changing perceptions of responsibility. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Individuals carrying gene mutations predisposing to hereditary breast/ovarian cancer have concerns about passing on the gene mutation to children. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Qualitative methodology and thematic analysis. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 25 women aged 18-45 who had received a positive result for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation while childless. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Analysis revealed four central themes: (i) the impact of cancer on reproductive decision-making; (ii) motivation for genetic testing; (iii) risk management and timing of planning children; and (iv) optimism for future medical advancements. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study explores the views of female BRCA carriers. Further research should explore the views of couples, men, and include samples with greater ethnic and social diversity. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: This evidence highlights the need for reproductive decision-making to be addressed at the time of pretest genetic counselling. More information should be provided on reproductive options as well as counselling/support to guide women's reproductive decision-making and prenatal testing options at the time they undertake genetic testing. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This research was supported by Cancer Research UK (Number C1226 A7920) and NIHR support to the Biomedical Research Centre at The Institute of Cancer Research and RMH. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23293217     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  21 in total

1.  Reproductive Decision-Making in MMR Mutation Carriers After Results Disclosure: Impact of Psychological Status in Childbearing Options.

Authors:  Jacqueline Duffour; Audrey Combes; Evelyne Crapez; Florence Boissière-Michot; Frédéric Bibeau; Pierre Senesse; Marc Ychou; Julie Courraud; Hélène de Forges; Lise Roca
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Attitudes Toward Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) for Genetic Disorders Among Potential Users in Malaysia.

Authors:  Angelina Patrick Olesen; Siti Nurani Mohd Nor; Latifah Amin
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Uptake of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis in Female BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Pnina Mor; Sarah Brennenstuhl; Kelly A Metcalfe
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Reproductive Decision-Making in Women with BRCA1/2 Mutations.

Authors:  Jessica L Chan; Lauren N C Johnson; Mary D Sammel; Laura DiGiovanni; Chan Voong; Susan M Domchek; Clarisa R Gracia
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  "It was an Emotional Baby": Previvors' Family Planning Decision-Making Styles about Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Marleah Dean; Emily A Rauscher
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Impact of BRCA1/2 mutation on young women's 5-year parenthood rates: a prospective comparative study (GENEPSO-PS cohort).

Authors:  Julien Mancini; Emmanuelle Mouret-Fourme; Catherine Noguès; Claire Julian-Reynier
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Experiences of Women Who Underwent Predictive BRCA 1/2 Mutation Testing Before the Age of 30.

Authors:  Kate Brunstrom; Alexandra Murray; Marion McAllister
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Reproductive decision making: interviews with mothers of children with undiagnosed developmental delay.

Authors:  Emily Pond; Rebecca Dimond
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2018-02-01

9.  Living With Genetic Vulnerability: a Life Course Perspective.

Authors:  Rebekah J Hamilton; Nancy A Innella; Dawn T Bounds
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Cancer risk assessment using genetic panel testing: considerations for clinical application.

Authors:  Susan Hiraki; Erica S Rinella; Freya Schnabel; Ruth Oratz; Harry Ostrer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.