PURPOSE: To assess two methods of fat and fibroglandular tissue (FGT) segmentation for measuring breast MRI FGT volume and FGT%, the volume percentage of FGT in the breast, in longitudinal studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine premenopausal women provided one MRI per week for 4 weeks during a natural menstrual cycle for a total of 36 datasets. We compared a fuzzy c-means (FC) and a 3-point Dixon segmentation method for estimation of changes in FGT volume and FGT% across the menstrual cycle. We also assessed whether differences due to changes in positioning each week could be minimized by coregistration, i.e., the application of the breast boundary selected at one visit to images obtained at other visits. RESULTS: FC and Dixon FGT volume were highly correlated (r = 0.93, P < 0.001), as was FC and Dixon FGT% (r = 0.86, P = 0.01), although Dixon measurements were on average 10-20% higher. Although FGT measured by both methods showed the expected pattern of increase during the menstrual cycle, the magnitude, and for one woman the direction, of change varied according to the method used. Measurements of FGT for coregistered images were in close agreement with those for which the boundaries were determined independently. CONCLUSION: The method of segmentation of fat and FGT tissue may have an impact on the results of longitudinal studies of changes in breast MRI FGT.
PURPOSE: To assess two methods of fat and fibroglandular tissue (FGT) segmentation for measuring breast MRI FGT volume and FGT%, the volume percentage of FGT in the breast, in longitudinal studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine premenopausal women provided one MRI per week for 4 weeks during a natural menstrual cycle for a total of 36 datasets. We compared a fuzzy c-means (FC) and a 3-point Dixon segmentation method for estimation of changes in FGT volume and FGT% across the menstrual cycle. We also assessed whether differences due to changes in positioning each week could be minimized by coregistration, i.e., the application of the breast boundary selected at one visit to images obtained at other visits. RESULTS: FC and Dixon FGT volume were highly correlated (r = 0.93, P < 0.001), as was FC and Dixon FGT% (r = 0.86, P = 0.01), although Dixon measurements were on average 10-20% higher. Although FGT measured by both methods showed the expected pattern of increase during the menstrual cycle, the magnitude, and for one woman the direction, of change varied according to the method used. Measurements of FGT for coregistered images were in close agreement with those for which the boundaries were determined independently. CONCLUSION: The method of segmentation of fat and FGT tissue may have an impact on the results of longitudinal studies of changes in breast MRI FGT.
Authors: Hui Li; William A Weiss; Milica Medved; Hiroyuki Abe; Gillian M Newstead; Gregory S Karczmar; Maryellen L Giger Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2016-12-28
Authors: Derik L Davis; Mohit N Gilotra; Rodolfo Calderon; Andrew Roberts; S Ashfaq Hasan Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Richard Ha; Peter Chang; Eralda Mema; Simukayi Mutasa; Jenika Karcich; Ralph T Wynn; Michael Z Liu; Sachin Jambawalikar Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Geraldine J Liao; Leah C Henze Bancroft; Roberta M Strigel; Rhea D Chitalia; Despina Kontos; Linda Moy; Savannah C Partridge; Habib Rahbar Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-04-19 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Lenka Minarikova; Stephan Gruber; Wolfgang Bogner; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Pascal A T Baltzer; Thomas H Helbich; Siegfried Trattnig; Marek Chmelik Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-09-14 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: E E Sigmund; S H Baete; T Luo; K Patel; D Wang; I Rossi; A Duarte; M Bruno; D Mossa; A Femia; S Ramachandran; D Stoffel; J S Babb; A G Franks; J Bencardino Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 5.315