BACKGROUND: Manual techniques of reproducing a preoperative plan for primary bone tumor resection using rudimentary devices and imprecise localization techniques can result in compromised margins or unnecessary removal of unaffected tissue. We examined whether a novel technique using computer-generated custom jigs more accurately reproduces a preoperative resection plan than a standard manual technique. DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE: Using CT images and advanced imaging, reverse engineering, and computer-assisted design software, custom jigs were designed to precisely conform to a specific location on the surface of partially skeletonized cadaveric femurs. The jigs were used to perform a hemimetaphyseal resection. METHODS: We performed CT scans on six matched pairs of cadaveric femurs. Based on a primary bone sarcoma model, a joint-sparing, hemimetaphyseal wide resection was precisely outlined on each femur. For each pair, the resection was performed using the standard manual technique on one specimen and the custom jig-assisted technique on the other. Superimposition of preoperative and postresection images enabled quantitative analysis of resection accuracy. RESULTS: The mean maximum deviation from the preoperative plan was 9.0 mm for the manual group and 2.0 mm for the custom-jig group. The percentages of times the maximum deviation was greater than 3 mm and greater than 4 mm was 100% and 72% for the manual group and 5.6% and 0.0% for the custom-jig group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that custom-jig technology substantially improves the accuracy of primary bone tumor resection, enabling a surgeon to reproduce a given preoperative plan reliably and consistently.
BACKGROUND: Manual techniques of reproducing a preoperative plan for primary bone tumor resection using rudimentary devices and imprecise localization techniques can result in compromised margins or unnecessary removal of unaffected tissue. We examined whether a novel technique using computer-generated custom jigs more accurately reproduces a preoperative resection plan than a standard manual technique. DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE: Using CT images and advanced imaging, reverse engineering, and computer-assisted design software, custom jigs were designed to precisely conform to a specific location on the surface of partially skeletonized cadaveric femurs. The jigs were used to perform a hemimetaphyseal resection. METHODS: We performed CT scans on six matched pairs of cadaveric femurs. Based on a primary bone sarcoma model, a joint-sparing, hemimetaphyseal wide resection was precisely outlined on each femur. For each pair, the resection was performed using the standard manual technique on one specimen and the custom jig-assisted technique on the other. Superimposition of preoperative and postresection images enabled quantitative analysis of resection accuracy. RESULTS: The mean maximum deviation from the preoperative plan was 9.0 mm for the manual group and 2.0 mm for the custom-jig group. The percentages of times the maximum deviation was greater than 3 mm and greater than 4 mm was 100% and 72% for the manual group and 5.6% and 0.0% for the custom-jig group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that custom-jig technology substantially improves the accuracy of primary bone tumor resection, enabling a surgeon to reproduce a given preoperative plan reliably and consistently.
Authors: Matthew F Koff; Le Roy Chong; Patrick Virtue; Dan Chen; Xioanan Wang; Timothy Wright; Hollis G Potter Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Paul A Meyers; John H Healey; Alexander J Chou; Leonard H Wexler; Pamela R Merola; Carol D Morris; Michael P Laquaglia; Michael G Kellick; Sara J Abramson; Richard Gorlick Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: D Luis Muscolo; Miguel A Ayerza; Luis Aponte-Tinao; Maximiliano Ranalletta; Eduardo Abalo Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Paul A Meyers; Cindy L Schwartz; Mark D Krailo; John H Healey; Mark L Bernstein; Donna Betcher; William S Ferguson; Mark C Gebhardt; Allen M Goorin; Michael Harris; Eugenie Kleinerman; Michael P Link; Helen Nadel; Michael Nieder; Gene P Siegal; Michael A Weiner; Robert J Wells; Richard B Womer; Holcombe E Grier Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Guangyu He; Amos Z Dai; Vamiq M Mustahsan; Aadit T Shah; Liming Li; Jafar A Khan; Michael R Bielski; David E Komatsu; Imin Kao; Fazel A Khan Journal: J Orthop Date: 2022-05-11
Authors: Lucas E Ritacco; Federico E Milano; Germán L Farfalli; Miguel A Ayerza; Domingo L Muscolo; Jose I Albergo; Luis A Aponte-Tinao Journal: JBJS Essent Surg Tech Date: 2017-10-11