Literature DB >> 23292702

Quantifying image distortion of orthopedic materials in magnetic resonance imaging.

Matthew F Koff1, Parina Shah, Kevin M Koch, Hollis G Potter.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the magnitude of image distortion between two-dimensional (2D) fast-spin-echo (FSE) images and 3D-MAVRIC by using a phantom with samples of common materials used in total joint arthroplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A phantom was constructed to hold samples of 316 stainless steel, cobalt chrome, titanium, and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), and to permit tracking of points between 2D-FSE and 3D-MAVRIC sequences. Imaging was performed with a 1.5 Tesla scanner. The displacement of points between the two acquisitions in regions of varying distance from the material sample was calculated. Measured displacements were compared with theoretical displacements calculated from MAVRIC frequency field maps, and to the known phantom dimensions.
RESULTS: Bulk in-plane artifacts increased from the control scan (0.20 ± 0.07 mm), to UHMWPE (0.23 ± 0.04 mm), titanium (0.40 ± 0.34 mm), cobalt chrome (1.35 ± 0.57 mm), and to stainless steel (2.56 ± 0.62 mm). A similar pattern was found for bulk through-plane measurements: control scan (0.36 ± 0.08 mm), UHMWPE (0.38 ± 0.05 mm), titanium (1.11 ± 0.51 mm), and cobalt chrome (2.08 ± 1.83 mm). Large distortions were observed near the metal samples, and reduced with distance from the samples. The differences between the measured displacement and theoretical displacement was typically less than one pixel or one slice dimension for in-plane and through-plane measurements, respectively. The difference between the 3D-MAVRIC and known dimensions of the phantom was less than two pixels, whereas the results for the 2D-FSE were less consistent.
CONCLUSION: Distortion was reduced in 3D-MAVRIC scans. Measured distortions corresponded well to theoretical calculations from frequency field map data.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., a Wiley company.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artifact; metal; susceptibility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23292702     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  19 in total

Review 1.  Imaging near orthopedic hardware.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Alissa J Burge; Kevin M Koch; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  MRI with intraoral orthodontic appliance-a comparative in vitro and in vivo study of image artefacts at 1.5 T.

Authors:  C Zachriat; P Asbach; K I Blankenstein; I Peroz; F H Blankenstein
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  What is the Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI for Component Loosening in THA?

Authors:  Alissa J Burge; Gabrielle P Konin; Jennifer L Berkowitz; Bin Lin; Matthew F Koff; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Metal artefact suppression at 3 T MRI: comparison of MAVRIC-SL with conventional fast spin echo sequences in patients with Hip joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martin Kretzschmar; Lorenzo Nardo; Misung M Han; Ursula Heilmeier; Craig Sam; Gabby B Joseph; Kevin M Koch; Roland Krug; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Advanced MRI Techniques for the Hip Joint: Focus on the Postoperative Hip.

Authors:  Jennifer L Berkowitz; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  MRI of THA Correlates With Implant Wear and Tissue Reactions: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Christina Esposito; Parina Shah; Mauro Miranda; Elexis Baral; Kara Fields; Thomas Bauer; Douglas E Padgett; Timothy Wright; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  MR imaging near metallic implants using MAVRIC SL: initial clinical experience at 3T.

Authors:  Luis B Gutierrez; Bao H Do; Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves; Kevin M Koch; Pauline W Worters; Kathryn J Stevens
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Assessment of Osteonecrosis in the Presence of Instrumentation for Femoral Neck Fracture Using Contrast-Enhanced MAVRIC Sequence.

Authors:  Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Matthew F Koff; Jonathan P Dyke; Lionel E Lazaro; Parina Shah; Dean G Lorich; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-10-08

9.  In vitro assessment of knee MRI in the presence of metal implants comparing MAVRIC-SL and conventional fast spin echo sequences at 1.5 and 3 T field strength.

Authors:  Hans Liebl; Ursula Heilmeier; Sonia Lee; Lorenzo Nardo; Janina Patsch; Christopher Schuppert; Misung Han; Ina-Christine Rondak; Suchandrima Banerjee; Kevin Koch; Thomas M Link; Roland Krug
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Metal artifacts from titanium and steel screws in CT, 1.5T and 3T MR images of the tibial Pilon: a quantitative assessment in 3D.

Authors:  Shairah Radzi; Gary Cowin; Mark Robinson; Jit Pratap; Andrew Volp; Michael A Schuetz; Beat Schmutz
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2014-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.