PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate an algorithm that automatically identifies high-susceptibility areas and excludes them from T(2) * measurements in the left ventricle (LV) for myocardial iron measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model was implemented on multigradient echo scans of 24 patients (age range 3-45 years, 10 male/14 female). Voxels with relatively high susceptibility (>3 Hz/mm) were flagged and deselected from the T(2) * calculations for iron quantification. The mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (CoV) of the ARMA-defined region were compared to the CoV of four distinct regions of the LV and the entire LV using a Student's t-test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The CoV of T(2) * values obtained by the ARMA method are comparable with that in the interventricular septum (IS), where susceptibility was the lowest (CoV = 0.31). The ARMA method provides a greater area (51.9 ± 13.7% of the LV) to measure T(2) * than that using the IS alone (21.1 ± 3.4%, P < 0.0001). Areas where low susceptibility are measured corroborate with areas reported in previous studies that investigated T(2) * variations throughout the LV. CONCLUSION: An automated method to measure T(2) * relaxation in the LV with minimal effects from susceptibility has been developed. Variability is reduced while covering more regions for cardiac T2 * calculation.
PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate an algorithm that automatically identifies high-susceptibility areas and excludes them from T(2) * measurements in the left ventricle (LV) for myocardial iron measurements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model was implemented on multigradient echo scans of 24 patients (age range 3-45 years, 10 male/14 female). Voxels with relatively high susceptibility (>3 Hz/mm) were flagged and deselected from the T(2) * calculations for iron quantification. The mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation (CoV) of the ARMA-defined region were compared to the CoV of four distinct regions of the LV and the entire LV using a Student's t-test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The CoV of T(2) * values obtained by the ARMA method are comparable with that in the interventricular septum (IS), where susceptibility was the lowest (CoV = 0.31). The ARMA method provides a greater area (51.9 ± 13.7% of the LV) to measure T(2) * than that using the IS alone (21.1 ± 3.4%, P < 0.0001). Areas where low susceptibility are measured corroborate with areas reported in previous studies that investigated T(2) * variations throughout the LV. CONCLUSION: An automated method to measure T(2) * relaxation in the LV with minimal effects from susceptibility has been developed. Variability is reduced while covering more regions for cardiac T2 * calculation.
Authors: Jane S Hankins; M Beth McCarville; Ralf B Loeffler; Matthew P Smeltzer; Mihaela Onciu; Fredric A Hoffer; Chin-Shang Li; Winfred C Wang; Russell E Ware; Claudia M Hillenbrand Journal: Blood Date: 2009-03-04 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Adlette Inati; Khaled M Musallam; John C Wood; Marwan Sheikh-Taha; Linda Daou; Ali T Taher Journal: Eur J Haematol Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 2.997
Authors: Zhiyue J Wang; Roland Fischer; Zili Chu; Donald H Mahoney; Brigitta U Mueller; Raja Muthupillai; Ellen B James; Rajesh Krishnamurthy; Taylor Chung; Eric Padua; Elliott Vichinsky; Paul Harmatz Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: P Kirk; M Roughton; J B Porter; J M Walker; M A Tanner; J Patel; D Wu; J Taylor; M A Westwood; L J Anderson; D J Pennell Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ruitian Song; Ralf B Loeffler; Joseph L Holtrop; M Beth McCarville; Jane S Hankins; Claudia M Hillenbrand Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Pandji Triadyaksa; Niek H J Prakken; Jelle Overbosch; Robin B Peters; J Martijn van Swieten; Matthijs Oudkerk; Paul E Sijens Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 2.310