OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a novel prototype self-anchoring suture (SAS) material that incorporates unidirectional "barbs" designed to grip and approximate tissue without the need for suture ligation for urinary tract reconstructive procedures. METHODS: The in vitro failure strength of various porcine tissue approximations with SAS was compared with the strength of similar approximations with standard ligated suture. For in vivo analysis, 3 pigs underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty with SAS on one side and 2-0 Vicryl suture on the contralateral side. Nine pigs underwent bladder neck anastomoses (BNA) performed with SAS (n = 3) and standard ligated interrupted suturing (n = 3) or standard ligated running suturing (n = 3). The operative times were compared. One week after surgery, the integrity of each anastomosis was evaluated radiographically and histopathologically. RESULTS: The in vitro analysis revealed no statistically different (P = 0.22) failure forces between the approximations performed with SAS (13.2 +/- 2.6 N) and standard suture (14.1 +/- 3.1 N). The in vitro analysis revealed no difference in operative times for the pyeloplasties (P = 0.72) or BNA (P = 0.31). None of the 1-week postoperative radiographic studies revealed extravasation. The histopathologic analysis revealed more fibrotic reaction associated with the SAS BNA procedures (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Self-anchoring suture secures tissue approximations at loads equivalent to tissue approximations with standard tied suture. Self-anchoring suture obviates the need for knot tying and provides a watertight anastomosis. With laparoscopic knot tying experience, anastomotic time with SAS and standard suture do not differ. Self-anchoring suture might induce more fibrosis. Long-term follow-up evaluation will be required before clinical application.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a novel prototype self-anchoring suture (SAS) material that incorporates unidirectional "barbs" designed to grip and approximate tissue without the need for suture ligation for urinary tract reconstructive procedures. METHODS: The in vitro failure strength of various porcine tissue approximations with SAS was compared with the strength of similar approximations with standard ligated suture. For in vivo analysis, 3 pigs underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty with SAS on one side and 2-0 Vicryl suture on the contralateral side. Nine pigs underwent bladder neck anastomoses (BNA) performed with SAS (n = 3) and standard ligated interrupted suturing (n = 3) or standard ligated running suturing (n = 3). The operative times were compared. One week after surgery, the integrity of each anastomosis was evaluated radiographically and histopathologically. RESULTS: The in vitro analysis revealed no statistically different (P = 0.22) failure forces between the approximations performed with SAS (13.2 +/- 2.6 N) and standard suture (14.1 +/- 3.1 N). The in vitro analysis revealed no difference in operative times for the pyeloplasties (P = 0.72) or BNA (P = 0.31). None of the 1-week postoperative radiographic studies revealed extravasation. The histopathologic analysis revealed more fibrotic reaction associated with the SAS BNA procedures (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Self-anchoring suture secures tissue approximations at loads equivalent to tissue approximations with standard tied suture. Self-anchoring suture obviates the need for knot tying and provides a watertight anastomosis. With laparoscopic knot tying experience, anastomotic time with SAS and standard suture do not differ. Self-anchoring suture might induce more fibrosis. Long-term follow-up evaluation will be required before clinical application.
Authors: Kevin C Zorn; Hugues Widmer; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Dan Liberman; Naeem Bhojani; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Maxine Sun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Ronald Denis; Assaad El-Hakim Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 1.862