Literature DB >> 23292088

Anatomy learning styles and strategies among Jordanian and Malaysian medical students: the impact of culture on learning anatomy.

Ayman G Mustafa1, Mohammed Z Allouh, Intisar G Mustafa, Ibrahim M Hoja.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study aims to investigate anatomy learning styles and strategies of Jordanian and Malaysian medical students at the Jordan University of Science and Technology.
METHODS: The study is a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. Students' responses for the questionnaire were numerically coded, and the results were analyzed to reveal statistically significant differences between Jordanian and Malaysian students.
RESULTS: The results showed that Jordanian medical students were less interested in using cadavers in learning anatomy than Malaysian medical students. However, similar to their Malaysian counterparts, they prefer to employ other tools to learn anatomy like plastinated models and Internet-based resources. In addition to the aforementioned tools, Malaysian students were more interested in using cross-sectional images and making their own revision cards. Both Jordanian and Malaysian medical students were more interested in learning anatomy through clinical cases, and by system rather than by region. Moreover, it was revealed that Jordanian medical students learn anatomy more efficiently when they formulate a general view of a particular topic. Both Jordanian and Malaysian medical students also relied on reciting definitions and memorizing facts to learn anatomy. The study also reported significant differences between Jordanian and Malaysian students' perspectives on learning anatomy.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the study suggest that Jordanian and Malaysian medical students posses different cultures of learning. Jordanian anatomy instructors need to consider these different learning cultures when they prepare their instructional methods and teaching materials to fulfill the educational needs of their culturally diverse students.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23292088     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-012-1067-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  21 in total

1.  Cognitive and learning styles in medical education.

Authors:  L Curry
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Attitudes of medical and dental students to dissection.

Authors:  J Snelling; A Sahai; H Ellis
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  Team-based learning in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course.

Authors:  Gary L Nieder; Dean X Parmelee; Adrienne Stolfi; Patricia D Hudes
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.414

4.  Can learning style predict student satisfaction with different instruction methods and academic achievement in medical education?

Authors:  Erol Gurpinar; Mustafa Kemal Alimoglu; Sumer Mamakli; Mehmet Aktekin
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  Evaluation of computer-aided instruction in a gross anatomy course: a six-year study.

Authors:  John A McNulty; Beth Sonntag; James M Sinacore
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Web-based interactive 3D visualization as a tool for improved anatomy learning.

Authors:  Helge Petersson; David Sinkvist; Chunliang Wang; Orjan Smedby
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  A cross-cultural comparison of anatomy learning: learning styles and strategies.

Authors:  Barry S Mitchell; Qin Xu; Lixian Jin; Debra Patten; Ingrid Gouldsborough
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Learning styles and approaches: implications for medical education.

Authors:  D I Newble; N J Entwistle
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 9.  Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum.

Authors:  B W Turney
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Knowledge loss of medical students on first year basic science courses at the University of Saskatchewan.

Authors:  Marcel F D'Eon
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 2.463

View more
  7 in total

1.  Learning style versus time spent studying and career choice: Which is associated with success in a combined undergraduate anatomy and physiology course?

Authors:  Gary J Farkas; Ewa Mazurek; Jane R Marone
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  Learning styles and strategies preferences of Iranian medical students in gross anatomy courses and their correlations with gender.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Atlasi; Alireza Moravveji; Hossein Nikzad; Vahid Mehrabadi; Homayoun Naderian
Journal:  Anat Cell Biol       Date:  2017-12-29

3.  Randomized Controlled Study of a Remote Flipped Classroom Neuro-otology Curriculum.

Authors:  Frederick Robert Carrick; Mahera Abdulrahman; Ahmed Hankir; Maksim Zayaruzny; Kinda Najem; Palita Lungchukiet; Roger A Edwards
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Kolb's Learning Style Inventory 4.0 and its association with traditional and problem based learning teaching methodologies in medical students.

Authors:  Muhammad Zafar Iqbal Hydrie; Syed Muhammad Zulfiqar Hyder Naqvi; Shams Nadeem Alam; Syed Imtiaz Ahmed Jafry
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  Adapting to a US Medical Curriculum in Malaysia: A Qualitative Study on Cultural Dissonance in International Education.

Authors:  Nicole Shilkofski; Ryan Y Shields
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-08-16

6.  Teaching Musculoskeletal Module using dissection videos: feedback from medical students.

Authors:  Ayman G Mustafa; Nour R Taha; Sami Zaqout; Mohammed Seed Ahmed
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Remote learning during Covid-19 lockdown: A study on anatomy and histology education for pharmacy students in Jordan.

Authors:  Zina M Al-Alami; Sofia W Adwan; Mervat Alsous
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 5.958

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.