Literature DB >> 17346399

Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum.

B W Turney1.   

Abstract

Anatomy in undergraduate education has been in decline for many years. Some suggest that it has fallen below a safe level. Balances between detail and safety, and assimilation and application of anatomy have yet to be established as the methods of teaching undergo another metamorphosis. For doctors, the human body is the focus of investigation and intervention on a daily basis; for this reason, the study of anatomy in some form will continue to be essential to safe medical practice. It is necessary for core knowledge of anatomy to be assimilated by all doctors in order to practice and communicate safely. It may be true that most doctors do not need to dissect a cadaver or study a prosection in order to practice, but if it can improve their understanding of what they do and why they do it, this surely has to be of benefit both for the safety of the patient and satisfaction of the doctor as a professional. Integration of newer teaching modalities and modern technology will encourage interest and retention of anatomical knowledge and its clinical relevance. Anatomy has a promising future in postgraduate specialist and surgical training. Detailed knowledge should be integrated into specialist training when it is clinically relevant allowing specialists of the future to practice safely and accurately and also to provide a strong base for future clinical developments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17346399      PMCID: PMC1964553          DOI: 10.1308/003588407X168244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  15 in total

Review 1.  Teaching and learning gross anatomy: dissection, prosection, or "both of the above?".

Authors:  C E Dinsmore; S Daugherty; H J Zeitz
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.414

2.  Attitudes of medical and dental students to dissection.

Authors:  J Snelling; A Sahai; H Ellis
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  Anatomy 1999-2000: the curriculum, who teaches it and how?

Authors:  D J A Heylings
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Perceptions of dissection by students in one medical school: beyond learning about anatomy. A qualitative study.

Authors:  Heidi K Lempp
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Do students have sufficient knowledge of clinical anatomy?

Authors:  Katinka J A H Prince; Albert J A A Scherpbier; Henk van Mameren; Jan Drukker; Cees P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.251

6.  Survey of clinicians' attitudes to the anatomical teaching and knowledge of medical students.

Authors:  S W Waterston; I J Stewart
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.414

7.  Reassessing the importance of dissection: a critique and elaboration.

Authors:  D G Jones
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.414

8.  Anatomy training for surgeons--a personal viewpoint.

Authors:  M H Kaufman
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1997-08

9.  Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research.

Authors:  D T Vernon; R L Blake
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 10.  Anatomy: a must for teaching the next generation.

Authors:  J Older
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.392

View more
  75 in total

1.  Laparoscopic surgery recording as an adjunct to conventional modalities of teaching gross anatomy.

Authors:  Pananghat A Kumar; Mark Norrish; Thomas Heming
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2011-10-25

2.  The article critique as a problem-based teaching method for medical students early in their training: a French example using anatomy.

Authors:  Eric Havet; Fabrice Duparc; Johan Peltier; Anne-Claire Tobenas-Dujardin; Pierre Fréger
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  "Between a Rock and a Hard Place": The discordant views among medical teachers about anatomy content in the undergraduate medical curriculum.

Authors:  Ibrahim M Inuwa; Varna Taranikanti; Maimouna Al-Rawahy; Sadhana Roychoudhry; Omar Habbal
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2012-02-07

4.  Teaching surgery, radiology and anatomy together: the mix enhances motivation and comprehension.

Authors:  Sabine Dettmer; Thomas Tschernig; Michael Galanski; Reinhard Pabst; Bernd Rieck
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 5.  Model pedagogy of human anatomy in medical education.

Authors:  Raj Kumar; Rajani Singh
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Endoscopic anatomy of the ulnar nerve: a useful adjunct to teaching anatomy.

Authors:  Paolo Matteucci; Menos Lagopoulos; Stephen Southern
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Art in science: the stage of the human body--the anatomical theatre of Bologna.

Authors:  Berardo Di Matteo; Vittorio Tarabella; Giuseppe Filardo; Anna Viganò; Patrizia Tomba; Laura Bragonzoni; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The influence of online review videos on gross anatomy course performance among doctor of chiropractic students.

Authors:  Nicole M Zipay; Christopher B Roecker; Dustin C Derby; Lia M Nightingale
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2020-10-01

9.  A Novel Three-Dimensional Interactive Virtual Face to Facilitate Facial Anatomy Teaching Using Microsoft HoloLens.

Authors:  Narendra Kumar; Shubham Pandey; Eqram Rahman
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 2.326

10.  Teaching with Disruptive Technology: The Use of Augmented, Virtual, and Mixed Reality (HoloLens) for Disease Education.

Authors:  Zane Stromberga; Charlotte Phelps; Jessica Smith; Christian Moro
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.