Literature DB >> 23291619

Genetic hitchhiking in spatially extended populations.

N H Barton1, A M Etheridge, J Kelleher, A Véber.   

Abstract

When a mutation with selective advantage s spreads through a panmictic population, it may cause two lineages at a linked locus to coalesce; the probability of coalescence is exp(-2rT), where T∼log(2Ns)/s is the time to fixation, N is the number of haploid individuals, and r is the recombination rate. Population structure delays fixation, and so weakens the effect of a selective sweep. However, favourable alleles spread through a spatially continuous population behind a narrow wavefront; ancestral lineages are confined at the tip of this front, and so coalesce rapidly. In extremely dense populations, coalescence is dominated by rare fluctuations ahead of the front. However, we show that for moderate densities, a simple quasi-deterministic approximation applies: the rate of coalescence within the front is λ∼2g(η)/(ρℓ), where ρ is the population density and ℓ=σ2/s is the characteristic scale of the wavefront; g(η) depends only on the strength of random drift, η=ρσs/2. The net effect of a sweep on coalescence also depends crucially on whether two lineages are ever both within the wavefront at the same time: even in the extreme case when coalescence within the front is instantaneous, the net rate of coalescence may be lower than in a single panmictic population. Sweeps can also have a substantial impact on the rate of gene flow. A single lineage will jump to a new location when it is hit by a sweep, with mean square displacement σeff(2)/σ(2)=(8/3)(L/ℓ)(Λ/R); this can be substantial if the species' range, L, is large, even if the species-wide rate of sweeps per map length, Λ/R, is small. This effect is half as strong in two dimensions. In contrast, the rate of coalescence between lineages, at random locations in space and on the genetic map, is proportional to (c/L)(Λ/R), where c is the wavespeed: thus, on average, one-dimensional structure is likely to reduce coalescence due to sweeps, relative to panmixis. In two dimensions, genes must move along the front before they can coalesce; this process is rapid, being dominated by rare fluctuations. This leads to a dramatically higher rate of coalescence within the wavefront than if lineages simply diffused along the front. Nevertheless, the net rate of coalescence due to a sweep through a two-dimensional population is likely to be lower than it would be with panmixis.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coalescence; Fisher–KPP; Hitchhiking; Selective sweeps; Spatial structure; Surfing

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23291619     DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2012.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  10 in total

1.  Speed of invasion of an expanding population by a horizontally transmitted trait.

Authors:  Juan Venegas-Ortiz; Rosalind J Allen; Martin R Evans
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The Role of Standing Variation in Geographic Convergent Adaptation.

Authors:  Peter L Ralph; Graham Coop
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Acceleration of evolutionary spread by long-range dispersal.

Authors:  Oskar Hallatschek; Daniel S Fisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Estimating the parameters of background selection and selective sweeps in Drosophila in the presence of gene conversion.

Authors:  José Luis Campos; Lei Zhao; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The effective founder effect in a spatially expanding population.

Authors:  Benjamin M Peter; Montgomery Slatkin
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 6.  The Red Queen in mitochondria: cyto-nuclear co-evolution, hybrid breakdown and human disease.

Authors:  Jui-Yu Chou; Jun-Yi Leu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Global adaptation complicates the interpretation of genome scans for local adaptation.

Authors:  Tom R Booker; Sam Yeaman; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2020-12-15

8.  Normal tissue architecture determines the evolutionary course of cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey West; Ryan O Schenck; Chandler Gatenbee; Mark Robertson-Tessi; Alexander R A Anderson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  New susceptibility locus for obesity and dyslipidaemia on chromosome 3q22.3.

Authors:  Maie Alshahid; Salma M Wakil; Mohammed Al-Najai; Nzioka P Muiya; Samar Elhawari; Daisy Gueco; Editha Andres; Samia Hagos; Nejat Mazhar; Brian F Meyer; Nduna Dzimiri
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.639

10.  Convergent Evolution During Local Adaptation to Patchy Landscapes.

Authors:  Peter L Ralph; Graham Coop
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 5.917

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.