Literature DB >> 23290595

Risk of perforation increases with delay in recognition and surgery for acute appendicitis.

Dominic Papandria1, Seth D Goldstein, Daniel Rhee, Jose H Salazar, Jamir Arlikar, Amany Gorgy, Gezzer Ortega, Yiyi Zhang, Fizan Abdullah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Appendicitis remains a common indication for urgent surgical intervention in the United States, and early appendectomy has long been advocated to mitigate the risk of appendiceal perforation. To better quantify the risk of perforation associated with delayed operative timing, this study examines the impact of length of inpatient stay preceding surgery on rates of perforated appendicitis in both adults and children.
METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional analysis using the National Inpatient Sample and Kids' Inpatient Database from 1988-2008. We selected patients with a discharge diagnosis of acute appendicitis (perforated or nonperforated) and receiving appendectomy within 7 d after admission. Patients electively admitted or receiving drainage procedures before appendectomy were excluded. We analyzed perforation rates as a function of both age and length of inpatient hospitalization before appendectomy.
RESULTS: Of 683,590 patients with a discharge diagnosis of appendicitis, 30.3% were recorded as perforated. Over 80% of patients underwent appendectomy on the day of admission, approximately 18% of operations were performed on hospital days 2-4, and later operations accounted for <1% of cases. During appendectomy on the day of admission, the perforation rate was 28.8%; this increased to 33.3% for surgeries on hospital day 2 and 78.8% by hospital day 8 (P<0.001). Adjusted for patient, procedure, and hospital characteristics, odds of perforation increased from 1.20 for adults and 1.08 for children on hospital day 2 to 4.76 for adults and 15.42 for children by hospital day 8 (P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Greater inpatient delay before appendectomy is associated with increased perforation rates for children and adults within this population-based study. These findings align with previous studies and with the conventional progressive pathophysiologic appendicitis model. Randomized prospective studies are needed to determine which patients benefit from nonoperative versus surgically aggressive management strategies for acute appendicitis.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute appendicitis; Appendectomy; Delayed operation; Kids’ Inpatient Database; National Inpatient Sample; Perforated appendicitis; Surgical outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23290595      PMCID: PMC4398569          DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  42 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopy or not: a meta-analysis of the surgical effects of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy.

Authors:  Zhihua Liu; Peng Zhang; Yanlei Ma; Hongqi Chen; Yukun Zhou; Ming Zhang; Zhaoxin Chu; Huanglong Qin
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.719

Review 2.  Use of antibiotics alone for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katherine Liu; Louis Fogg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 3.  The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis.

Authors:  Roland E Andersson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Perforated appendicitis among rural and urban patients: implications of access to care.

Authors:  Ian M Paquette; Randall Zuckerman; Samuel R G Finlayson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis.

Authors:  Nina A Bickell; Arthur H Aufses; Mary Rojas; Carol Bodian
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis.

Authors:  D R Flum; A Morris; T Koepsell; E P Dellinger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Effects of race, insurance status, and hospital volume on perforated appendicitis in children.

Authors:  Douglas S Smink; Steven J Fishman; Ken Kleinman; Jonathan A Finkelstein
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Insurance status, but not race, predicts perforation in adult patients with acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Fredric M Pieracci; Soumitra R Eachempati; Philip S Barie; Mark A Callahan
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  The continuing challenge of perforating appendicitis.

Authors:  K S Scher; J A Coil
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1980-04

10.  National estimates of hospital utilization by children with gastrointestinal disorders: analysis of the 1997 kids' inpatient database.

Authors:  Stephen L Guthery; Caroline Hutchings; J Michael Dean; Charles Hoff
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.406

View more
  49 in total

1.  Acute appendicitis in the public and private sectors in Cape Town, South Africa.

Authors:  Estin Yang; Colin Cook; Delawir Kahn
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Urinary biomarkers in pediatric appendicitis.

Authors:  Martin Salö; Bodil Roth; Pernilla Stenström; Einar Arnbjörnsson; Bodil Ohlsson
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Acute appendicitis in childhood: oral contrast does not improve CT diagnosis.

Authors:  Crystal R Farrell; Adam D Bezinque; Jared M Tucker; Erica A Michiels; Bradford W Betz
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2018-01-06

4.  Appendicectomies performed >48 hours after admission to a dedicated acute general surgical unit.

Authors:  B March; D Gillies; J Gani
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Should Oral Contrast Be Omitted in Patients with Suspected Appendicitis?

Authors:  Lily Saadat; Irene Helenowski; David Mahvi; Anne-Marie Boller
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Risk factors for morbidity after appendectomy.

Authors:  Anne Andert; H P Alizai; C D Klink; N Neitzke; C Fitzner; C Heidenhain; A Kroh; U P Neumann; M Binnebösel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Appendiceal stump closure using polymeric clips reduces intra-abdominal abscesses.

Authors:  Christopher Soll; Paloma Wyss; Hans Gelpke; Dimitri Aristotle Raptis; Stefan Breitenstein
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Time to Appendectomy and Risk of Complicated Appendicitis and Adverse Outcomes in Children.

Authors:  Stephanie K Serres; Danielle B Cameron; Charity C Glass; Dionne A Graham; David Zurakowski; Mahima Karki; Seema P Anandalwar; Shawn J Rangel
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 16.193

9.  Time to appendectomy and risk of perforation in acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Frederick Thurston Drake; Neli E Mottey; Ellen T Farrokhi; Michael G Florence; Morris G Johnson; Charles Mock; Scott R Steele; Richard C Thirlby; David R Flum
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 10.  Pediatric incidental appendectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  James M Healy; Lena F Olgun; Adam B Hittelman; Doruk Ozgediz; Michael G Caty
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 1.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.