Crystal R Farrell1,2, Adam D Bezinque3, Jared M Tucker2,4, Erica A Michiels5, Bradford W Betz6,7. 1. Grand Rapids Medical Education Partners, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. 2. Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. 3. Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, MI, USA. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital and Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. 5. Emergency Department, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital and Spectrum Health, Emergency Care Specialists, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. 6. Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. brad.betz@helendevoschildrens.org. 7. Department of Radiology, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital and Spectrum Health, Advanced Radiology Services, 100 North Michigan Avenue N.E, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. brad.betz@helendevoschildrens.org.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We compared the diagnostic accuracy of CT performed without and with oral contrast for suspected appendicitis in children. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed abdomen/pelvis CT scans with IV contrast performed between 2011 and 2015 for suspected appendicitis. Oral contrast was used routinely before August 2013 and eliminated from the CT protocol thereafter. Diagnostic accuracy of CT was compared with operative/pathology reports, and included a 30-day follow-up period for non-surgical patients. For a secondary analysis, the oral contrast group was subdivided into "complete" (contrast extending into the cecum) or "partial" contrast. We also compared groups for CT turnaround time, the frequency of appendiceal perforation and abscess, and the potential influence of a prior appendix ultrasound. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-eight patients were included: 51.6% (n = 288) without oral contrast and 48.4% (n = 270) with oral contrast (of which 52% (n = 140/270) had "complete" contrast). There was no difference in diagnostic accuracy between the oral contrast and non-contrast groups (p = 0.903), with sensitivity/specificity of 93.8% (95% CI 84.8-98.3)/98.5% (CI 95.8-99.7) and 94.6% (CI 84.9-98.9)/98.3% (CI 95.7-99.5), respectively. Similarly, there was no difference in accuracy when comparing only "complete" contrast vs. non-contrast groups (p = 0.755). CT turnaround time for the non-contrast group was significantly faster (43.8 ± 37.6 min), on average, than the oral contrast group (137.4 ± 47.5 min). CONCLUSION: For children evaluated by CT with IV contrast for suspected appendicitis, administering oral contrast increased wait time by > 90 min, did not reach the cecum in 48% of cases, and did not improve diagnostic accuracy. Oral contrast for pediatric CT appendicitis evaluation is not warranted.
INTRODUCTION: We compared the diagnostic accuracy of CT performed without and with oral contrast for suspected appendicitis in children. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed abdomen/pelvis CT scans with IV contrast performed between 2011 and 2015 for suspected appendicitis. Oral contrast was used routinely before August 2013 and eliminated from the CT protocol thereafter. Diagnostic accuracy of CT was compared with operative/pathology reports, and included a 30-day follow-up period for non-surgical patients. For a secondary analysis, the oral contrast group was subdivided into "complete" (contrast extending into the cecum) or "partial" contrast. We also compared groups for CT turnaround time, the frequency of appendiceal perforation and abscess, and the potential influence of a prior appendix ultrasound. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-eight patients were included: 51.6% (n = 288) without oral contrast and 48.4% (n = 270) with oral contrast (of which 52% (n = 140/270) had "complete" contrast). There was no difference in diagnostic accuracy between the oral contrast and non-contrast groups (p = 0.903), with sensitivity/specificity of 93.8% (95% CI 84.8-98.3)/98.5% (CI 95.8-99.7) and 94.6% (CI 84.9-98.9)/98.3% (CI 95.7-99.5), respectively. Similarly, there was no difference in accuracy when comparing only "complete" contrast vs. non-contrast groups (p = 0.755). CT turnaround time for the non-contrast group was significantly faster (43.8 ± 37.6 min), on average, than the oral contrast group (137.4 ± 47.5 min). CONCLUSION: For children evaluated by CT with IV contrast for suspected appendicitis, administering oral contrast increased wait time by > 90 min, did not reach the cecum in 48% of cases, and did not improve diagnostic accuracy. Oral contrast for pediatric CT appendicitis evaluation is not warranted.
Authors: James A Meltzer; Sergey Kunkov; Jennifer H Chao; Ee Tein Tay; Jerry P George; David Borukhov; Stephen Alerhand; Prince A Harrison; Jeffrey Hom; Ellen F Crain Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: M E Mullins; M F Kircher; D P Ryan; D Doody; T C Mullins; J T Rhea; R A Novelline Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Ming Chien; Arie Habis; Loretto Glynn; Ann O'Connor; Tracie L Smith; Francis Prendergast Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2016-05-03 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Aman Wadhwani; Lancia Guo; Erik Saude; Hein Els; Eddie Lang; Andrew McRae; Deepak Bhayana Journal: Can Assoc Radiol J Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 2.248