Literature DB >> 23290518

An evaluation of patient reported outcomes following breast reconstruction utilizing Breast Q.

Ryan Sugrue1, Geraldine MacGregor1, Michael Sugrue2, Sharon Curran1, Laura Murphy1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Breast Q questionnaire measures patient's perceptions following breast reconstruction using quality of life and satisfaction. This study assessed patient reported outcomes following mastectomy and reconstruction utilizing Breast Q.
METHODS: All consecutive Letterkenny Hospital patients undergoing mastectomy and breast reconstruction between August 2008 and February 2011 were invited to complete Breast Q evaluation of their care. Collected data included: age; presenting complaint, height, weight; type of operation. RUMM 2020 program evaluated satisfaction where 0 is very dissatisfied to 100 very satisfied.
RESULTS: 30/33 (91%) patients completed Breast Q; mean age 43 ± 11 (range 29-64); mean BMI 27.3 ± 5 (range 21.7-43.1). 27 patients were symptomatic, and 3 were image detected. 23 had a latissimus dorsi reconstruction, 11 of these with implant augmentation, 5 had a DIEP and 2 implant only reconstruction. The mean satisfaction score of 79.7 indicating good to excellent results. Post reconstructive outcomes were not statistically different from pre-operative perceptions in key areas such as satisfaction with breasts, psychosocial and sexual well-being.
CONCLUSION: This study identified outcomes as good as if not superior to international averages with preservation of satisfaction with breast and psychosocial well-being. Breast Q could help form a template for national benchmarks in patients undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23290518     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  12 in total

1.  Patient satisfaction with nipple-sparing mastectomy: A prospective study of patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Michael A Howard; Mark Sisco; Katharine Yao; David J Winchester; Ermilo Barrera; Jeremy Warner; Jennifer Jaffe; Peter Hulick; Kristine Kuchta; Andrea L Pusic; Stephen F Sener
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  The Impact of Obesity on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jonas A Nelson; Nikhil Sobti; Aadit Patel; Evan Matros; Colleen M McCarthy; Joseph H Dayan; Joseph J Disa; Peter G Cordeiro; Babak J Mehrara; Andrea L Pusic; Robert J Allen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Patient-Reported Outcomes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Alone or in Combination with a Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Mesh - A Detailed Analysis of the BREAST-Q and Overview of the Literature.

Authors:  M Dieterich; J Angres; J Stubert; A Stachs; T Reimer; B Gerber
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 4.  The BREAST-Q in surgical research: A review of the literature 2009-2015.

Authors:  Wess A Cohen; Lily R Mundy; Tiffany N S Ballard; Anne Klassen; Stefan J Cano; John Browne; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  A Prospective Study Assessing Complication Rates and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Reconstructions Using a Novel, Deep Dermal Human Acellular Dermal Matrix.

Authors:  Michael M Vu; Gildasio S De Oliveira; Kristen E Mayer; Jordan T Blough; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-01-07

6.  Patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstructive surgery: A prospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Salem Mohammad Alshammari; Mohammed Yousef Aldossary; Khaled Almutairi; Abdulaziz Almulhim; Gousay Alkhazmari; Mohammed Alyaqout; Hussain Abrar
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-02-16

7.  Quality of Life After Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy and Simultaneous Reconstruction Using Pre-Pectoral Silicone Implants.

Authors:  Nick Spindler; Franziska Ebel; Susanne Briest; Sandra Wallochny; Stefan Langer
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 2.711

8.  An international mixed methods study to develop a new preference-based measure for women with breast cancer: the BREAST-Q Utility module.

Authors:  Manraj N Kaur; Anne F Klassen; Feng Xie; Louise Bordeleau; Toni Zhong; Stefan J Cano; Elena Tsangaris; Trisia Breitkopf; Ayse Kuspinar; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  A randomised online experimental study to compare responses to brief and extended surveys of health-related quality of life and psychosocial outcomes among women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Kerry Ettridge; Joanna Caruso; David Roder; Ivanka Prichard; Katrine Scharling-Gamba; Kathleen Wright; Caroline Miller
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.440

10.  BREAST-Q Measurement of the Patient Perspective in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Liang Q Liu; Olivier A Branford; Sinead Mehigan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.