Literature DB >> 23290477

Differentiation of myeloma and metastatic cancer in the spine using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Ning Lang1, Min-Ying Su, Hon J Yu, Muqing Lin, Mark J Hamamura, Huishu Yuan.   

Abstract

Spinal myeloma and metastatic cancer cause similar symptoms and show similar imaging presentations, thus making them difficult to differentiate. In this study, dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) was performed to differentiate between 9 myelomas and 22 metastatic cancers that present as focal lesions in the spine. The characteristic DCE parameters, including the peak signal enhancement percentage (SE%), the steepest wash-in SE% during the ascending phase and the wash-out SE%, were calculated by normalizing to the precontrast signal intensity. The two-compartmental pharmacokinetic model was used to obtain K(trans) and kep. All nine myelomas showed the wash-out DCE pattern. Of the 22 metastatic cancers, 12 showed wash-out, 7 showed plateau, and 3 showed persistent enhancing patterns. The fraction of cases that showed the wash-out pattern was significantly higher in the myeloma group than the metastatic cancer group (9/9=100% vs. 12/22=55%, P=.03). Compared to the metastatic cancer group, the myeloma group had a higher peak SE% (226%±72% vs. 165%±60%, P=.044), a higher steepest wash-in SE% (169%±51% vs. 111%±41%, P=.01), a higher K(trans) (0.114±0.036 vs. 0.077±0.0281/min, P=.016) and a higher kep (0.88±0.26 vs. 0.49±0.23 1/min, P=.002). The receiver operating characteristic analysis to differentiate between these two groups showed that the area under the curve was 0.798 for K(trans), 0.864 for kep and 0.919 for combined K(trans) and kep. These results show that DCE-MRI may provide additional information for making differential diagnosis to aid in choosing the optimal subsequent procedures or treatments for spinal lesions.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Differential diagnosis; Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; Metastatic cancer; Myeloma; Spine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23290477      PMCID: PMC3620894          DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  33 in total

1.  MRI gadolinium enhancement of bone marrow: age-related changes in normals and in diffuse neoplastic infiltration.

Authors:  A Baur; A Stäbler; R Bartl; R Lamerz; J Scheidler; M Reiser
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and pharmacokinetic models in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tobias Franiel; Bernd Hamm; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  MR imaging of musculoskeletal tumors and tumor mimickers with intravenous gadolinium: experience with 242 patients.

Authors:  D A May; R B Good; D K Smith; T W Parsons
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Contrast enhancement and quantitative signal analysis in MR imaging of multiple myeloma: assessment of focal and diffuse growth patterns in marrow correlated with biopsies and survival rates.

Authors:  A Stäbler; A Baur; R Bartl; R Munker; R Lamerz; M F Reiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging.

Authors:  P S Tofts
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Prognostic value of bone marrow angiogenesis in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S V Rajkumar; T Leong; P C Roche; R Fonseca; A Dispenzieri; M Q Lacy; J A Lust; T E Witzig; R A Kyle; M A Gertz; P R Greipp
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Cartilaginous tumors: fast contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  M J Geirnaerdt; P C Hogendoorn; J L Bloem; A H Taminiau; H J van der Woude
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Bone marrow microcirculation analysis in multiple myeloma by contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  T M Moehler; H Hawighorst; K Neben; G Egerer; J Hillengass; R Max; A Benner; A D Ho; G van Kaick; H Goldschmidt
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Benign and malignant musculoskeletal lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging--parametric "first-pass" images depict tissue vascularization and perfusion.

Authors:  K L Verstraete; Y De Deene; H Roels; A Dierick; D Uyttendaele; M Kunnen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Musculoskeletal neoplasm: perineoplastic edema versus tumor on dynamic postcontrast MR images with spatial mapping of instantaneous enhancement rates.

Authors:  P Lang; G Honda; T Roberts; M Vahlensieck; J O Johnston; W Rosenau; A Mathur; C Peterfy; C A Gooding; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  15 in total

1.  Morphological and dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging features for the differentiation of chordoma and giant cell tumors in the Axial Skeleton.

Authors:  Ning Lang; Min-Ying Su; Xiaoying Xing; Hon J Yu; Huishu Yuan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Imaging of multiple myeloma: Current concepts.

Authors:  Thorsten Derlin; Peter Bannas
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-07-18

3.  Differentiation of tuberculosis and metastatic cancer in the spine using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Ning Lang; Min-Ying Su; Hon J Yu; Huishu Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Differentiation of spinal metastases originated from lung and other cancers using radiomics and deep learning based on DCE-MRI.

Authors:  Ning Lang; Yang Zhang; Enlong Zhang; Jiahui Zhang; Daniel Chow; Peter Chang; Hon J Yu; Huishu Yuan; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Diagnosis of Spinal Lesions Using Heuristic and Pharmacokinetic Parameters Measured by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Ning Lang; Huishu Yuan; Hon J Yu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  Bone marrow MR perfusion imaging and potential for tumor evaluation.

Authors:  James F Griffith; R A van der Heijden
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 2.128

7.  Diagnosis of spinal lesions using perfusion parameters measured by DCE-MRI and metabolism parameters measured by PET/CT.

Authors:  Jiahui Zhang; Yongye Chen; Yanyan Zhang; Enlong Zhang; Hon J Yu; Huishu Yuan; Yang Zhang; Min-Ying Su; Ning Lang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Adult onset asynchronous multifocal eosinophilic granuloma of bone: an 11-year follow-up.

Authors:  Benjamin Dallaudière; Joseph Kerger; Jacques Malghem; Christine Galant; Frederic E Lecouvet
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2015-01-29

9.  Differentiation of multiple myeloma and metastases: Use of axial diffusion-weighted MR imaging in addition to standard MR imaging at 3T.

Authors:  Ga Eun Park; Won-Hee Jee; So-Yeon Lee; Jin-Kyeong Sung; Joon-Yong Jung; Robert Grimm; Yohan Son; Mun Young Paek; Chang-Kee Min; Kee-Yong Ha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Application of monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential models of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the differential diagnosis of metastases and myeloma in the spine-Univariate and multivariate analysis of related parameters.

Authors:  Xiaoying Xing; Jiahui Zhang; Yongye Chen; Qiang Zhao; Ning Lang; Huishu Yuan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.