Ning Lang1, Min-Ying Su2, Xiaoying Xing1, Hon J Yu2, Huishu Yuan1. 1. Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. 2. Tu & Yuen Center for Functional Onco-Imaging, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To characterize the morphological and dynamic-contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI features of chordoma and giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone occurring in the axial skeleton. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 13 patients with chordoma and 26 patients with GCT who received conventional T1, T2, and DCE-MRI on 3 Tesla MR scanners were retrospectively identified and analyzed. Two radiologists evaluated morphological features independently, including the lesion location, expansile bone changes, vertebral compression, presence of paraspinal soft tissue mass, fibrous septa, and the signal intensity on T1WI and T2WI. The inter-observer agreement was evaluated by kappa test. The DCE kinetics was measured to obtain the initial area under curve (IAUC) and the wash-out slope; also the two-compartmental pharmacokinetic model was applied to obtain Ktrans and kep . The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by CHAID decision tree and ROC analysis. RESULTS: Chordomas were more likely to show soft tissue mass than GCTs (13/13 = 100% versus 15/26 = 58%; P = 0.007), as well as fibrous septa (9/13 = 69% versus 0; P < 0.001). In decision tree analysis, presence of fibrous septa and lesion location yield 31/39 = 79% accuracy. The DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters Ktrans and kep of GCTs were significantly higher than those of chordomas, 0.13 ± 0.65 versus 0.06 ± 0.04 (1/min) for Ktrans , 0.62 ± 0.22 versus 0.17 ± 0.12 (1/min) for kep , P < 0.001 for both. If using kep = 0.43/min as the cut-off value, it achieved 100% sensitivity and 92% specificity to differentiate chordoma from GCT, with an overall accuracy of 37/39 = 95%. The IAUC was highly correlated with Ktrans (r = 0.94), and the slope was highly correlated with kep (r = 0.95). CONCLUSION: Several morphological features were significantly different between chordoma and GCT, but their diagnostic performance was inferior to that of DCE-MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:1068-1075.
PURPOSE: To characterize the morphological and dynamic-contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI features of chordoma and giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone occurring in the axial skeleton. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 13 patients with chordoma and 26 patients with GCT who received conventional T1, T2, and DCE-MRI on 3 Tesla MR scanners were retrospectively identified and analyzed. Two radiologists evaluated morphological features independently, including the lesion location, expansile bone changes, vertebral compression, presence of paraspinal soft tissue mass, fibrous septa, and the signal intensity on T1WI and T2WI. The inter-observer agreement was evaluated by kappa test. The DCE kinetics was measured to obtain the initial area under curve (IAUC) and the wash-out slope; also the two-compartmental pharmacokinetic model was applied to obtain Ktrans and kep . The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by CHAID decision tree and ROC analysis. RESULTS:Chordomas were more likely to show soft tissue mass than GCTs (13/13 = 100% versus 15/26 = 58%; P = 0.007), as well as fibrous septa (9/13 = 69% versus 0; P < 0.001). In decision tree analysis, presence of fibrous septa and lesion location yield 31/39 = 79% accuracy. The DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters Ktrans and kep of GCTs were significantly higher than those of chordomas, 0.13 ± 0.65 versus 0.06 ± 0.04 (1/min) for Ktrans , 0.62 ± 0.22 versus 0.17 ± 0.12 (1/min) for kep , P < 0.001 for both. If using kep = 0.43/min as the cut-off value, it achieved 100% sensitivity and 92% specificity to differentiate chordoma from GCT, with an overall accuracy of 37/39 = 95%. The IAUC was highly correlated with Ktrans (r = 0.94), and the slope was highly correlated with kep (r = 0.95). CONCLUSION: Several morphological features were significantly different between chordoma and GCT, but their diagnostic performance was inferior to that of DCE-MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:1068-1075.
Authors: Corey J Chakarun; Deborah M Forrester; Christopher J Gottsegen; Dakshesh B Patel; Eric A White; George R Matcuk Journal: Radiographics Date: 2013 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: S Gerber; L Ollivier; J Leclère; D Vanel; G Missenard; H Brisse; G de Pinieux; S Neuenschwander Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2007-11-23 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: P Santos; K K Peck; J Arevalo-Perez; S Karimi; E Lis; Y Yamada; A I Holodny; J Lyo Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ning Lang; Yang Zhang; Enlong Zhang; Jiahui Zhang; Daniel Chow; Peter Chang; Hon J Yu; Huishu Yuan; Min-Ying Su Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Rene G C Santegoeds; Yasin Temel; Jan C Beckervordersandforth; Jacobus J Van Overbeeke; Christianne M Hoeberigs Journal: Curr Radiol Rep Date: 2018-04-03