Literature DB >> 23286611

Population-based breast cancer screening in a primary care network.

Steven J Atlas1, Jeffrey M Ashburner, Yuchiao Chang, William T Lester, Michael J Barry, Richard W Grant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the ability of a health information technology system to facilitate population- based breast cancer screening. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study with 2-year follow-up after a 1-year cluster randomized trial.
METHODS: Study population was women 42 to 69 years old receiving care within a 12-practice primary care network. The management informatics system (1) identified women overdue for mammograms, (2) connected them to primary care providers using a web-based tool, (3) created automatically generated outreach letters for patients specified by providers, (4) monitored for subsequent mammography scheduling and completion, and (5) provided practice delegates with a list of women remaining unscreened for reminder phone calls. Eligible women overdue for a mammogram during a 1-year study period included those overdue at study start (prevalent cohort) and those who became overdue during follow-up (incident cohort). The main outcome measure was mammography completion rates over 3 years.
RESULTS: Among 32,688 eligible women, 9795 (30%) were overdue for screening (4487 intervention, 5308 control). Intervention patients were somewhat younger, more likely to be non-Hispanic white, and more likely to have health insurance compared with control patients. Adjusted completion rates in the prevalent cohort (n = 6697) were significantly higher among intervention patients after 3 years (51.7% vs 45.8%; P = .002). For patients in the incident cohort (n = 3098), adjusted completion rates after 2 years were 53.8% versus 48.7%, respectively (P = .052).
CONCLUSIONS: Population-based informatics systems can enable sustained increases in mammography screening rates beyond rates seen with office-based visit reminders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23286611      PMCID: PMC3766952     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  25 in total

1.  Updated recommendations for client- and provider-oriented interventions to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  How health plans, health systems, and others in the private sector can stimulate 'meaningful use'.

Authors:  Sachin H Jain; Joshua Seidman; David Blumenthal
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  A cluster-randomized trial of a primary care informatics-based system for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Steven J Atlas; Richard W Grant; William T Lester; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Yuchiao Chang; Michael J Barry; Henry C Chueh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Electronic health record adoption and quality improvement in US hospitals.

Authors:  Spencer S Jones; John L Adams; Eric C Schneider; Jeanne S Ringel; Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Processes for effective communication in primary care.

Authors:  Saul J Weiner; Beth Barnet; Tina L Cheng; Timothy P Daaleman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Impact of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program on mammography and Pap test utilization among white, Hispanic, and African American women: 1996-2000.

Authors:  E Kathleen Adams; Nancy Breen; Peter J Joski
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer?

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Diana L Miglioretti; Nicole Lurie; Linn Abraham; Rachel Ballard Barbash; Jodi Strzelczyk; Mark Dignan; William E Barlow; Cherry M Beasley; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Kathleen A Cronin; Stephanie Bailey; Donald A Berry; Harry J de Koning; Gerrit Draisma; Hui Huang; Sandra J Lee; Mark Munsell; Sylvia K Plevritis; Peter Ravdin; Clyde B Schechter; Bronislava Sigal; Michael A Stoto; Natasha K Stout; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; John Venier; Marvin Zelen; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Stephanie J Sohl; Anne Moyer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 10.  What implementation interventions increase cancer screening rates? a systematic review.

Authors:  Melissa C Brouwers; Carol De Vito; Lavannya Bahirathan; Angela Carol; June C Carroll; Michelle Cotterchio; Maureen Dobbins; Barbara Lent; Cheryl Levitt; Nancy Lewis; S Elizabeth McGregor; Lawrence Paszat; Carol Rand; Nadine Wathen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of an Automated Information Extraction Tool for Imaging Data Elements to Populate a Breast Cancer Screening Registry.

Authors:  Ronilda Lacson; Kimberly Harris; Phyllis Brawarsky; Tor D Tosteson; Tracy Onega; Anna N A Tosteson; Abby Kaye; Irina Gonzalez; Robyn Birdwell; Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Multilevel Intervention Raises Latina Participation in Mammography Screening: Findings from ¡Fortaleza Latina!

Authors:  Gloria D Coronado; Shirley A A Beresford; Dale McLerran; Ricardo Jimenez; Donald L Patrick; India Ornelas; Sonia Bishop; John R Scheel; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Sociodemographic correlates of cervix, breast and oral cancer screening among Indian women.

Authors:  Zhu Changkun; Ghose Bishwajit; Lu Ji; Shangfeng Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Technology as the key to women's empowerment: a scoping review.

Authors:  April Mackey; Pammla Petrucka
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.809

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.