Literature DB >> 22704753

Updated recommendations for client- and provider-oriented interventions to increase breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.

.   

Abstract

The Community Preventive Services Task Force (Task Force) recommends increasing screening for breast cancer through use of group education, one-on-one education, client reminders, reducing client out-of-pocket costs, and provider assessment and feedback; increasing screening for cervical cancer through use of one-on-one education, client reminders, and provider assessment and feedback; and increasing screening for colorectal cancer through use of one-on-one education, client reminders, reducing structural barriers to screening, and provider assessment and feedback. The Task Force found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of increasing screening for breast cancer through use of client incentives, mass media, or provider incentives; for cervical cancer screening through use of group education, client incentives, mass media, reducing client out-of-pocket costs, reducing structural barriers, or provider incentives; and for colorectal cancer screening through use of group education, client incentives, mass media, reducing client out-of-pocket costs, or provider incentives. Details of these findings, and some considerations for use, are provided in this article.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22704753     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  25 in total

1.  Cervical cytology screening among low-income, minority adolescents in New York City following the 2009 ACOG guidelines.

Authors:  Jennifer Tsui; Annika M Hofstetter; Karen Soren
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 2.  Evolution of cervical cancer screening and prevention in United States and Canada: implications for public health practitioners and clinicians.

Authors:  M Saraiya; M Steben; M Watson; L Markowitz
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Cervical cancer screening with AMIGAS: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Yu-Chia Chang; Theresa L Byrd; Judith Lee Smith; Maria E Fernandez; Katherine M Wilson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Capsule Commentary on Mehta et al. Race/Ethnicity and Adoption of a Population Health Management Approach to Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Community-Based Healthcare System.

Authors:  David H Howard
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  HPV Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening Among Ethnic Minority Women in South Florida: a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Olveen Carrasquillo; Julia Seay; Anthony Amofah; Larry Pierre; Yisel Alonzo; Shelia McCann; Martha Gonzalez; Dinah Trevil; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Erin Kobetz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Evaluation of Mammogram Parties as an Effective Community Navigation Method.

Authors:  Kristi L Allgood; Bijou Hunt; Jacqueline M Kanoon; Melissa A Simon
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  The effects of test preference, test access, and navigation on colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Constantine Daskalakis; Sally W Vernon; Randa Sifri; Melissa DiCarlo; James Cocroft; Jocelyn Andrel Sendecki; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Improving hepatocellular carcinoma screening: applying lessons from colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Amit G Singal; Jasmin A Tiro; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Structuring Health in Colorectal Cancer Screening Conversations: An Analysis of Intersecting Activity Systems.

Authors:  Heather Canary; Connie Bullis; Jennifer Cummings; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  South Commun J       Date:  2015-11-04

10.  Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Evidence-Based Guidelines for and Against Clinical Preventive Services: Results from a National Survey.

Authors:  Paula M Lantz; W Douglas Evans; Holly Mead; Carmen Alvarez; Lisa Stewart
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.911

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.