Literature DB >> 23286120

Selection of optimal hyper-parameters for estimation of uncertainty in MRI-TRUS registration of the prostate.

Petter Risholm1, Firdaus Janoos, Jennifer Pursley, Andriy Fedorov, Clare Tempany, Robert A Cormack, William M Wells.   

Abstract

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) facilitates intra-treatment delineation of the prostate gland (PG) to guide insertion of brachytherapy seeds, but the prostate substructure and apex are not always visible which may make the seed placement sub-optimal. Based on an elastic model of the prostate created from MRI, where the prostate substructure and apex are clearly visible, we use a Bayesian approach to estimate the posterior distribution on deformations that aligns the pre-treatment MRI with intra-treatment TRUS. Without apex information in TRUS, the posterior prediction of the location of the prostate boundary, and the prostate apex boundary in particular, is mainly determined by the pseudo stiffness hyper-parameter of the prior distribution. We estimate the optimal value of the stiffness through likelihood maximization that is sensitive to the accuracy as well as the precision of the posterior prediction at the apex boundary. From a data-set of 10 pre- and intra-treatment prostate images with ground truth delineation of the total PG, 4 cases were used to establish an optimal stiffness hyper-parameter when 15% of the prostate delineation was removed to simulate lack of apex information in TRUS, while the remaining 6 cases were used to cross-validate the registration accuracy and uncertainty over the PG and in the apex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23286120      PMCID: PMC3712120          DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33454-2_14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv


  6 in total

1.  Learning task-optimal registration cost functions for localizing cytoarchitecture and function in the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  B T Thomas Yeo; Mert R Sabuncu; Tom Vercauteren; Daphne J Holt; Katrin Amunts; Karl Zilles; Polina Golland; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Image registration for targeted MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Fiona M Fennessy; Junichi Tokuda; Nobuhiko Hata; William M Wells; Ron Kikinis; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  PROBABILISTIC NON-RIGID REGISTRATION OF PROSTATE IMAGES: MODELING AND QUANTIFYING UNCERTAINTY.

Authors:  Petter Risholm; Andriy Fedorov; Jennifer Pursley; Kemal Tuncali; Robert Cormack; William M Wells
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging       Date:  2011-06-09

4.  Probabilistic inference of regularisation in non-rigid registration.

Authors:  Ivor J A Simpson; Julia A Schnabel; Adrian R Groves; Jesper L R Andersson; Mark W Woolrich
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Learning statistical correlation for fast prostate registration in image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yonghong Shi; Shu Liao; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  MR to ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate interventions.

Authors:  Yipeng Hu; Hashim Uddin Ahmed; Zeike Taylor; Clare Allen; Mark Emberton; David Hawkes; Dean Barratt
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 8.545

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Bayesian characterization of uncertainty in intra-subject non-rigid registration.

Authors:  Petter Risholm; Firdaus Janoos; Isaiah Norton; Alex J Golby; William M Wells
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 2.  Multimodal imaging for improved diagnosis and treatment of cancers.

Authors:  Clare M C Tempany; Jagadeesan Jayender; Tina Kapur; Raphael Bueno; Alexandra Golby; Nathalie Agar; Ferenc A Jolesz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 6.860

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.