Literature DB >> 18710438

The oncological results of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell cancer are equal to those of open nephroureterectomy.

Matthias Waldert1, Mesut Remzi, Hans Christoph Klingler, Lukas Mueller, Michael Marberger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the overall, tumour-specific, recurrence-free, and progression- free survival of patients with upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma (UUT-TCC) treated with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) or standard open NU (ONU). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical, pathological and follow-up data were analysed for 43 LNUs and 59 ONUs performed at our institution from 1999 to 2006. In LNU the kidney was removed laparoscopically as in radical nephrectomy, but without transecting the ureter. The specimen was then removed intact with the entire ureter and a bladder cuff through a nonmuscle-splitting supra-inguinal incision. ONU was performed through separate intercostal and supra-inguinal incisions with the entire specimen being removed intact with a bladder cuff through the latter.
RESULTS: The mean (SD) follow-up was 41 (20) months for LNU and 41 (29) for ONU. Pathological staging was: pTa 26% vs 20%, pT1 21% vs 27%, pT2 12% vs 17%, pT3 42% vs 34% for LNU and ONU, respectively. In all, seven vs six patients had positive nodes on final histology. Recurrent tumours in the bladder were detected in 26% of patients after LNU and in 27% after ONU after the mean follow-up. There were no local recurrences after LNU but there was local recurrence in six patients after ONU. There were no port-site metastases during the follow-up. Five LNU patients and seven ONU patients developed distant or lymph node metastasis. The actuarial 5-year tumour free-survival rate was 79% in the LNU group vs 76% in the ONU group (P = 0.82). The actuarial disease-specific survival at 5-years was 85% for LNU and 80% for ONU patients (P = 0.62). The surgical approach did not influence recurrence or survival.
CONCLUSION: Oncological results of LNU and ONU are comparable. The lower morbidity of LNU offers advantages for the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18710438     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07950.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  21 in total

1.  Comparison between laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy in a contemporary group of patients: are recurrence and disease-specific survival associated with surgical technique?

Authors:  Ricardo L Favaretto; Shahrokh F Shariat; Daher C Chade; Guilherme Godoy; Matthew Kaag; Angel M Cronin; Bernard H Bochner; Jonathan Coleman; Guido Dalbagni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the lower ureteral segment in adults.

Authors:  Michael Musch; Heinrich Loewen; Yadollah Davoudi; Maxim Yanovskiy; Jan Lukas Hohenhorst; Michaela Vanberg; Darko Kroepfl
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-07-28

3.  Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: what have we learned in the last 4 years?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Shahrokh Shariat; Wilhelm Huebner; Harun Fajkovic; Christian Seitz
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-04

4.  Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results from three high-volume robotic surgery institutions.

Authors:  Ruben De Groote; Karel Decaestecker; Alessandro Larcher; Sarah Buelens; Elise De Bleser; Frederiek D'Hondt; Peter Schatteman; Nicolaas Lumen; Francesco Montorsi; Alexandreμ Mottrie; Geert De Naeyer
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-04-30

Review 5.  The role of lymphadenectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Jamie Messer; Yu Kuan Lin; Jay D Raman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Systematic review of open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Emma Mullen; Kamran Ahmed; Ben Challacombe
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

Review 7.  Ureteroscopic laser treatment of upper urinary tract neoplasms.

Authors:  Demetrius H Bagley; Michael Grasso
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Oncologic outcomes obtained after laparoscopic, robotic and/or single port nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract tumours.

Authors:  Maria J Ribal; J Huguet; A Alcaraz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy is associated with worse survival outcomes than open radical nephroureterectomy in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyung Suk Kim; Ja Hyeon Ku; Chang Wook Jeong; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Regional differences in practice patterns and associated outcomes for upper tract urothelial carcinoma in Canada.

Authors:  Michael Metcalfe; Wassim Kassouf; Ricardo Rendon; David Bell; Jonathan Izawa; Joseph Chin; Anil Kapoor; Edward Matsumoto; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Fred Saad; Louis Lacombe; Yves Fradet; Adrian Fairey; Niels-Eric Jacobson; Darryl Drachenberg; Ilias Cagiannos; Alan So; Peter Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.