Literature DB >> 23279569

Site-specific effects of mental practice combined with transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning.

Aguida Foerster1, Sérgio Rocha, Carine Wiesiolek, Anna Paula Chagas, Giselle Machado, Evelyn Silva, Felipe Fregni, Katia Monte-Silva.   

Abstract

Mental practice can induce significant neural plasticity and result in motor performance improvement if associated with motor imagery tasks. Given the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on neuroplasticity, the current study tested whether tDCS, using different electrode montages, can increase the neuroplastic effects of mental imagery on motor learning. Eighteen healthy right-handed adults underwent a randomised sham-controlled crossover experiment to receive mental training combined with either sham or active anodal tDCS of the right primary motor cortex (M1), right supplementary motor area, right premotor area, right cerebellum or left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Motor performance was assessed by a blinded rater using: non-dominant handwriting time and legibility, and mentally trained task at baseline (pre) and immediately after (post) mental practice combined with tDCS. Active tDCS significantly enhances the motor-imagery-induced improvement in motor function as compared with sham tDCS. There was a specific effect for the site of stimulation such that effects were only observed after M1 and DLPFC stimulation during mental practice. These findings provide new insights into motor imagery training and point out that two cortical targets (M1 and DLPFC) are significantly associated with the neuroplastic effects of mental imagery on motor learning. Further studies should explore a similar paradigm in patients with brain lesions.
© 2012 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23279569     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.12079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  26 in total

1.  Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation--a consensus paper.

Authors:  G Grimaldi; G P Argyropoulos; A Boehringer; P Celnik; M J Edwards; R Ferrucci; J M Galea; S J Groiss; K Hiraoka; P Kassavetis; E Lesage; M Manto; R C Miall; A Priori; A Sadnicka; Y Ugawa; U Ziemann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Lasting modulation of in vitro oscillatory activity with weak direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Davide Reato; Marom Bikson; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review.

Authors:  Kim van Dun; Florian Bodranghien; Mario Manto; Peter Mariën
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Poststimulation time interval-dependent effects of motor cortex anodal tDCS on reaction-time task performance.

Authors:  Andrés Molero-Chamizo; José R Alameda Bailén; Tamara Garrido Béjar; Macarena García López; Inmaculada Jaén Rodríguez; Carolina Gutiérrez Lérida; Silvia Pérez Panal; Gloria González Ángel; Laura Lemus Corchero; María J Ruiz Vega; Michael A Nitsche; Guadalupe N Rivera-Urbina
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 5.  The uncertain outcome of prefrontal tDCS.

Authors:  Sara Tremblay; Jean-François Lepage; Alex Latulipe-Loiselle; Felipe Fregni; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Hugo Théoret
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 6.  [Transcranial direct current stimulation for depressive disorders].

Authors:  S Aust; U Palm; F Padberg; M Bajbouj
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.214

7.  Hemodynamic responses in rat brain during transcranial direct current stimulation: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy study.

Authors:  Chang-Hee Han; Hyuna Song; Yong-Guk Kang; Beop-Min Kim; Chang-Hwan Im
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Parametric study of transcranial alternating current stimulation for brain alpha power modulation.

Authors:  Beatrice P De Koninck; Samuel Guay; Hélène Blais; Louis De Beaumont
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2021-02-03

9.  Effectiveness of a combined transcranial direct current stimulation and virtual reality-based intervention on upper limb function in chronic individuals post-stroke with persistent severe hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Roberto Llorens; María Antonia Fuentes; Adrián Borrego; Jorge Latorre; Mariano Alcañiz; Carolina Colomer; Enrique Noé
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Je pense donc je fais: transcranial direct current stimulation modulates brain oscillations associated with motor imagery and movement observation.

Authors:  Olivia M Lapenta; Ludovico Minati; Felipe Fregni; Paulo S Boggio
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.