Literature DB >> 29330825

Poststimulation time interval-dependent effects of motor cortex anodal tDCS on reaction-time task performance.

Andrés Molero-Chamizo1, José R Alameda Bailén2, Tamara Garrido Béjar2, Macarena García López2, Inmaculada Jaén Rodríguez2, Carolina Gutiérrez Lérida2, Silvia Pérez Panal2, Gloria González Ángel2, Laura Lemus Corchero2, María J Ruiz Vega2, Michael A Nitsche3,4, Guadalupe N Rivera-Urbina5.   

Abstract

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces long-term potentiation-like plasticity, which is associated with long-lasting effects on different cognitive, emotional, and motor performances. Specifically, tDCS applied over the motor cortex is considered to improve reaction time in simple and complex tasks. The timing of tDCS relative to task performance could determine the efficacy of tDCS to modulate performance. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of a single session of anodal tDCS (1.5 mA, for 15 min) applied over the left primary motor cortex (M1) versus sham stimulation on performance of a go/no-go simple reaction-time task carried out at three different time points after tDCS-namely, 0, 30, or 60 min after stimulation. Performance zero min after anodal tDCS was improved during the whole course of the task. Performance 30 min after anodal tDCS was improved only in the last block of the reaction-time task. Performance 60 min after anodal tDCS was not significantly different throughout the entire task. These findings suggest that the motor cortex excitability changes induced by tDCS can improve motor responses, and these effects critically depend on the time interval between stimulation and task performance.

Keywords:  Anodal direct current; Primary motor cortex; Reaction time; Transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29330825     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-0561-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  56 in total

1.  Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Astrid Schauenburg; Nicolas Lang; David Liebetanz; Cornelia Exner; Walter Paulus; Frithjof Tergau
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation--update 2011.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation?

Authors:  Alberto Priori; Mark Hallett; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 4.  Therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation with direct currents (tDCS) in neuropsychiatric diseases.

Authors:  Min-Fang Kuo; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  The effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on multi-limb coordination performance.

Authors:  D J F Leenus; K Cuypers; D Vanvlijmen; R L J Meesen
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 6.  A comprehensive database of published tDCS clinical trials (2005-2016).

Authors:  Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
Journal:  Neurophysiol Clin       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.734

Review 7.  A technical guide to tDCS, and related non-invasive brain stimulation tools.

Authors:  A J Woods; A Antal; M Bikson; P S Boggio; A R Brunoni; P Celnik; L G Cohen; F Fregni; C S Herrmann; E S Kappenman; H Knotkova; D Liebetanz; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; W Paulus; A Priori; D Reato; C Stagg; N Wenderoth; M A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation.

Authors:  Charlotte J Stagg; Jonathan G Best; Mary C Stephenson; Jacinta O'Shea; Marzena Wylezinska; Z Tamas Kincses; Peter G Morris; Paul M Matthews; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A pragmatic analysis of the regulation of consumer transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) devices in the United States.

Authors:  Anna Wexler
Journal:  J Law Biosci       Date:  2015-10-12

10.  Effector-independent reduction in choice reaction time following bi-hemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation over motor cortex.

Authors:  Neil M Drummond; Gabrielle Hayduk-Costa; Alexandra Leguerrier; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Combined Yoga and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Increase Functional Connectivity and Synchronization in the Frontal Areas.

Authors:  Omid Sefat; Mohammad Ali Salehinejad; Marlon Danilewitz; Reza Shalbaf; Fidel Vila-Rodriguez
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Motor Areas Improves Reaction Time in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Christin M Sadler; Aline Tiemi Kami; Julie Nantel; Jonathan Lommen; Anthony N Carlsen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.086

3.  TDCS effects on pointing task learning in young and old adults.

Authors:  E Kaminski; M Engelhardt; M Hoff; C Steele; P Ragert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Computer-Delivered Cognitive Training and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients With HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Raymond L Ownby; Jae Kim
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 5.750

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.