Literature DB >> 23277769

Implementation of a performance improvement initiative in colorectal cancer care.

John L Marshall1, Thomas H Cartwright, Carolyn A Berry, Stephanie A Stowell, Sara C Miller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer after breast and prostate cancer. Numerous improvement programs have been implemented to increase CRC screening rates, but few have focused on improving the care and management of patients with a diagnosis of this malignancy. As national medical organizations focus on quality of care, efforts are necessary to provide clinicians the opportunity for self-assessment and methods for practice improvement. With this goal in mind, a national continuing medical education-certified performance improvement initiative was conceived.
METHODS: THE INITIATIVE CONSISTED OF THREE STAGES: First, participants self-assessed their performance of predetermined topic measures through a review of patient charts. The topic areas included patient safety and supportive care, evidence-based surveillance, and evidenced-based treatment and were derived from current guidelines and other successful quality-improvement initiatives. Second, an actionable plan for practice improvement was developed in at least one of the three topic areas. Third, after a period of self-improvement, participants reassessed their performance of the same topic measures to determine tangible changes in patient care.
RESULTS: A total of 540 patient charts were reviewed by 27 clinicians. Notable results showed large gains in areas of supportive care, such as quantitative pain assessments and emotional well-being evaluations, which traditionally have been a minor focus of other quality-improvement initiatives. Participants also showed tangible improvements in the performance of leading measures of quality care.
CONCLUSION: These findings support the need for continued efforts toward performance improvement in both established and emerging areas of CRC patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23277769      PMCID: PMC3439232          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  20 in total

1.  Evaluating the quality of psychosocial care in outpatient medical oncology settings using performance indicators.

Authors:  Paul B Jacobsen; David Shibata; Erin M Siegel; Ji-Hyun Lee; William J Fulp; Carlos Alemany; Guillermo Abesada-Terk; Richard Brown; Thomas Cartwright; Douglas Faig; George Kim; Richard Levine; Merry-Jennifer Markham; Fred Schreiber; Philip Sharp; Mokenge Malafa
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: rectal cancer.

Authors:  Paul F Engstrom; Juan Pablo Arnoletti; Al B Benson; Yi-Jen Chen; Michael A Choti; Harry S Cooper; Anne Covey; Raza A Dilawari; Dayna S Early; Peter C Enzinger; Marwan G Fakih; James Fleshman; Charles Fuchs; Jean L Grem; Krystyna Kiel; James A Knol; Lucille A Leong; Edward Lin; Mary F Mulcahy; Sujata Rao; David P Ryan; Leonard Saltz; David Shibata; John M Skibber; Constantinos Sofocleous; James Thomas; Alan P Venook; Christopher Willett
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients.

Authors:  Paul B Jacobsen; Kristine A Donovan; Peter C Trask; Stewart B Fleishman; James Zabora; Frank Baker; Jimmie C Holland
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.

Authors:  Michael N Neuss; Christopher E Desch; Kristen K McNiff; Peter D Eisenberg; Dean H Gesme; Joseph O Jacobson; Mohammad Jahanzeb; Jennifer J Padberg; John M Rainey; Jeff J Guo; Joseph V Simone
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Psychiatric disorders and mental health service use in patients with advanced cancer: a report from the coping with cancer study.

Authors:  Nina S Kadan-Lottick; Lauren C Vanderwerker; Susan D Block; Baohui Zhang; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Measuring quality of care in the treatment of colorectal cancer: the moffitt quality practice initiative.

Authors:  Paul B Jacobsen; David Shibata; Erin M Siegel; Mihaela Druta; Ji-Hyun Lee; Jan Marshburn; Linda Davenport; Hugh Cruse; Richard Levine; Avantica Gondi; Richard Brown; Mokenge Malafa
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 7.  Psychological approaches to understanding and treating disease-related pain.

Authors:  Francis J Keefe; Amy P Abernethy; Lisa C Campbell
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Implementation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative at a university comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  Douglas W Blayney; Kristen McNiff; David Hanauer; Gretchen Miela; Denise Markstrom; Michael Neuss
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The Florida Initiative for Quality Cancer Care: a regional project to measure and improve cancer care.

Authors:  Mokenge P Malafa; Michelle M Corman; David Shibata; Erin M Siegel; Ji-Hyun Lee; Paul B Jacobsen
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.302

Review 10.  Quality of life data as prognostic indicators of survival in cancer patients: an overview of the literature from 1982 to 2008.

Authors:  Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.