Literature DB >> 23277189

Peripatellar synovitis: comparison between non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced MRI and association with pain. The MOST study.

M D Crema1, D T Felson, F W Roemer, J Niu, M D Marra, Y Zhang, J A Lynch, G Y El-Khoury, C E Lewis, A Guermazi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance of signal changes in Hoffa's fat pad (HFP) assessed on non-contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting synovitis, and the association of pain with signal changes in HFP on non-CE MRI and peripatellar synovial thickness on CE MRI.
METHODS: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis (MOST) Study is an observational study of individuals who have or are at high risk for knee OA. All subjects with available non-CE and CE MRIs were included. Signal changes in HFP were scored from 0 to 3 in two regions using non-CE MRI. Synovial thickness was scored from 0 to 2 on CE MRI in five peripatellar regions. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of HFP signal changes were calculated considering synovial thickness on CE MRI as the reference standard. We used logistic regression to assess the associations of HFP changes (non-CE MRI) and synovial thickness (CE MRI) with pain from walking up or down stairs, after adjusting for potential confounders.
RESULTS: A total of 393 subjects were included. Sensitivity of infrapatellar and intercondylar signal changes in HFP was high (71% and 88%), but specificity was low (55% and 30%). No significant associations were found between HFP changes on non-CE MRI and pain. Grade 2 synovial thickness assessed on CE MRI was significantly associated with pain after adjustments for potential confounders.
CONCLUSION: Signal changes in HFP detected on non-CE MRI are a sensitive but non-specific surrogate for the assessment of synovitis. CE MRI identifies associations with pain better than non-CE MRI.
Copyright © 2013 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23277189      PMCID: PMC3578385          DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  21 in total

1.  Comparing non-enhanced and enhanced sequences in the assessment of effusion and synovitis in knee OA: associations with clinical, macroscopic and microscopic features.

Authors:  D Loeuille; N Sauliere; J Champigneulle; A C Rat; A Blum; I Chary-Valckenaere
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Fixed-flexion radiography of the knee provides reproducible joint space width measurements in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Manish Kothari; Ali Guermazi; Gabriele von Ingersleben; Yves Miaux; Martine Sieffert; Jon E Block; Randall Stevens; Charles G Peterfy
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Knee effusions, popliteal cysts, and synovial thickening: association with knee pain in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  C L Hill; D G Gale; C E Chaisson; K Skinner; L Kazis; M E Gale; D T Felson
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  A connective tissue disease screening questionnaire for population studies.

Authors:  E W Karlson; J Sanchez-Guerrero; E A Wright; R A Lew; L H Daltroy; J N Katz; M H Liang
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 5.  Patellofemoral pain syndrome: a review of current issues.

Authors:  R Thomeé; J Augustsson; J Karlsson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging-determined synovial membrane volume as a marker of disease activity and a predictor of progressive joint destruction in the wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  M Ostergaard; M Hansen; M Stoltenberg; P Gideon; M Klarlund; K E Jensen; I Lorenzen
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1999-05

7.  Importance of timing of post-contrast MRI in rheumatoid arthritis: what happens during the first 60 minutes after IV gadolinium-DTPA?

Authors:  M Østergaard; M Klarlund
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  C G Peterfy; A Guermazi; S Zaim; P F J Tirman; Y Miaux; D White; M Kothari; Y Lu; K Fye; S Zhao; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 9.  MRI of Hoffa's fat pad.

Authors:  D Saddik; E G McNally; M Richardson
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Synovial thickening detected by MR imaging in osteoarthritis of the knee confirmed by biopsy as synovitis.

Authors:  F Fernandez-Madrid; R L Karvonen; R A Teitge; P R Miller; T An; W G Negendank
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.546

View more
  10 in total

1.  Between-group differences in infra-patellar fat pad size and signal in symptomatic and radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis vs non-progressive controls and healthy knees - data from the FNIH Biomarkers Consortium Study and the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  A Ruhdorfer; F Haniel; T Petersohn; J Dörrenberg; W Wirth; T Dannhauer; D J Hunter; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2017-02-12       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Relationship between magnetic resonance imaging findings, radiological grading, psychological distress and pain in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Marina Carotti; Fausto Salaffi; Marco Di Carlo; Andrea Giovagnoni
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Clinical and translational potential of MRI evaluation in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Daichi Hayashi; Ali Guermazi; C Kent Kwoh
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 4.  Interpretation of Cartilage Damage at Routine Clinical MRI: How to Match Arthroscopic Findings.

Authors:  B Keegan Markhardt; Brady K Huang; Andrea M Spiker; Eric Y Chang
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  Double-inversion recovery with synthetic magnetic resonance: a pilot study for assessing synovitis of the knee joint compared to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jisook Yi; Young Han Lee; Ho-Taek Song; Jin-Suck Suh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Plasma levels of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL1Ra) predict radiographic progression of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  M Attur; A Statnikov; J Samuels; Z Li; A V Alekseyenko; J D Greenberg; S Krasnokutsky; L Rybak; Q A Lu; J Todd; H Zhou; J M Jordan; V B Kraus; C F Aliferis; S B Abramson
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Quantitative Signal Intensity Alteration in Infrapatellar Fat Pad Predicts Incident Radiographic Osteoarthritis: The Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Kang Wang; Changhai Ding; Michael J Hannon; Zhongshan Chen; C Kent Kwoh; David J Hunter
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 8.  An emerging player in knee osteoarthritis: the infrapatellar fat pad.

Authors:  Andreea Ioan-Facsinay; Margreet Kloppenburg
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 9.  Animal models of osteoarthritis: classification, update, and measurement of outcomes.

Authors:  Emmanuel L Kuyinu; Ganesh Narayanan; Lakshmi S Nair; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 10.  Advanced Imaging in Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Qi Li; Keiko Amano; Thomas M Link; C Benjamin Ma
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.843

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.