Literature DB >> 26994926

Prevalence of axial symptoms after posterior cervical decompression: a meta-analysis.

Miao Wang1, Xiao Ji Luo2, Qian Xing Deng1, Jia Hong Li3, Nan Wang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence of axial symptoms (AS) in patients following posterior cervical decompression.
METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for relevant studies that reported the incidence of AS after posterior cervical decompression, and manually screened reference lists for additional studies. Relevant prevalence estimates were calculated. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and publication bias assessment were also performed.
RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 44 studies, with 893 AS cases in 2984 patients. The pooled AS prevalence was 28 % (95 % CI 24-32). The prevalence of AS was higher after expansive open-door laminoplasty (39 %) than after modified open-door laminoplasty (MOLP, 23 %) and laminectomy instrumented fusion (29 %). AS prevalence was also higher in those that wore a neck collar for 2-3 months (34 %) compared with 2 weeks (21 %). The lowest AS prevalence (9 %) was found in patients who underwent MOLP with C3 laminectomy and C7 spinous processes conserved. There was an intermediate AS prevalence after MOLP with C7 spinous processes conserved (16 %), MOLP with preservation of the unilateral posterior muscular-ligament complex (19 %), MOLP with C3 laminectomy (22 %), and MOLP with plate fixation (23 %). Prevalence of AS might be higher in patients <60 years and increased in populations with a higher proportion of females.
CONCLUSIONS: Posterior cervical surgery carries a high risk of postoperative AS. Postoperative AS may be reduced through preserving posterior muscles and structures, stabilizing cervical vertebrae, and reducing external cervical immobilization time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axial pain; Axial symptom; Laminectomy; Laminoplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26994926     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4524-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  50 in total

Review 1.  Prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Xinwei Wang; Wanshan Bai; Xiaolong Shen; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Retrospective cohort study between selective and standard C3-7 laminoplasty. Minimum 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Takashi Tsuji; Takashi Asazuma; Kazunori Masuoka; Hiroki Yasuoka; Takao Motosuneya; Tsubasa Sakai; Koichi Nemoto
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Long-term outcome of laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to disc herniation: a comparative study of laminoplasty and anterior spinal fusion.

Authors:  Hironobu Sakaura; Noboru Hosono; Yoshihiro Mukai; Takahiro Ishii; Motoki Iwasaki; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Modified expansive open-door laminoplasty technique improved postoperative neck pain and cervical range of motion.

Authors:  Kuang-Ting Yeh; Ing-Ho Chen; Tzai-Chiu Yu; Kuan-Lin Liu; Cheng-Huan Peng; Jen-Hung Wang; Ru-Ping Lee; Wen-Tien Wu
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  A comparative study of surgical approaches for cervical compressive myelopathy.

Authors:  M Kawakami; T Tamaki; H Iwasaki; M Yoshida; M Ando; H Yamada
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Tateru Shiraishi; Kentaro Fukuda; Yoshiyuki Yato; Mitsukazu Nakamura; Takeshi Ikegami
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Outcomes after laminoplasty compared with laminectomy and fusion in patients with cervical myelopathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Tim Yoon; Robin E Hashimoto; Annie Raich; Christopher I Shaffrey; John M Rhee; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review.

Authors:  John K Ratliff; Paul R Cooper
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Differences between subtotal corpectomy and laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  S Shibuya; S Komatsubara; S Oka; Y Kanda; N Arima; T Yamamoto
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.772

10.  Effect of lamina open angles in expansion open-door laminoplasty on the clinical results in treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; Shouliang Lu; Tianwei Sun; Sandip K Yadav
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2015-04
View more
  18 in total

1.  Factors associated with postoperative axial symptom after expansive open-door laminoplasty: retrospective study using multivariable analysis.

Authors:  Xiuru Zhang; Yanzheng Gao; Kun Gao; Zhenghong Yu; Dongbo Lv; Hao Ma; Gongwei Zhai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  A novel posterior approach preserving three muscles inserted at C2 in multilevel cervical posterior decompression and fusion using C2 pedicle screws.

Authors:  Kazunari Takeuchi; Toru Yokoyama; Takuya Numasawa; Taito Itabashi; Yoshihito Yamasaki; Hitoshi Kudo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [All levels miniplate fixation and a modified hybrid fixation method in expansive open-door cervical laminoplasty: a retrospective comparative study].

Authors:  Z C Yang; C X Liu; Y Lin; W H Hu; W J Chen; F Li; H Zeng
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-02-18

4.  Laminoplasty and simultaneous C2 semi-laminectomy with internal fixation in treating ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in cervical discs at C2 segment.

Authors:  Yipeng Yang; Yu Wang; Junming Cao; Tao Lei; Zongyou Yang; Hehuan Xia
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Unilateral biportal endoscopic laminectomy with lateral mass screw fixation for treating cervical spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Chengyue Zhu; Xueqing Deng; Hao Pan; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Two Modified Open-door Laminoplasties Based on a Novel Paraspinal Approach for Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Qian Guo; Yong Xu; Zhong Fang; Hanfeng Guan; Wei Xiong; Feng Li
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.241

7.  Biportal endoscopic unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Jiyeon Kim; Dong Hwa Heo; Dong Chan Lee; Hung Tae Chung
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Laminoplasty with selective fusion at unstable segment versus laminectomy with fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a case-control study.

Authors:  Lin Du; Yanzheng Gao; Changqing Zhao; Tangjun Zhou; Haijun Tian; Kai Zhang; Jie Zhao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Fluoroscopy-assisted posterior percutaneous reduction for the management of unilateral cervical facet dislocations after unsuccessful closed reduction: A case report.

Authors:  Takaki Shimizu; Katsuhito Yoshioka; Hideki Murakami; Satoru Demura; Satoshi Kato; Noriaki Yokogawa; Norihiro Oku; Ryo Kitagawa; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2019-05-03

10.  Long-term outcomes and prognostic analysis of modified open-door laminoplasty with lateral mass screw fusion in treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Nan Su; Qi Fei; Bingqiang Wang; Dong Li; Jinjun Li; Hai Meng; Yong Yang; Ai Guo
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.