Literature DB >> 27524677

Acellular dermal matrix reduces capsule formation in two-stage breast reconstruction.

Karan Chopra1,2, Bryan Buckingham1, Jamil Matthews1, Jennifer Sabino1, Kashyap K Tadisina1, Ronald P Silverman1, Nelson H Goldberg1, Sheri Slezak1, Devinder P Singh3.   

Abstract

Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is commonly employed to create an inferior pocket for the tissue expander in two-stage breast reconstruction. The authors sought to determine whether placement of ADM during the first stage of reconstruction decreases the amount of capsule formation at implant exchange. Patients who underwent mastectomy and tissue expander reconstruction were included in this study. Two biopsies were obtained at the time of implant exchange, one from the pocket adjacent to the ADM and the other from the area adjacent to the pectoralis muscle. Pathology analysis was performed on each sample. Ten patients underwent immediate breast reconstruction with Alloderm during the 3-month study period. Capsule thickness was significantly greater in the areas where the expander was in direct contact with the pectoralis muscle (782 ± 194 µm) compared to those in contact with human acellular dermal matrix (hADM) (47·91 ± 110·82 µm; P < 0·05). Analysis of the sub-pectoral capsule demonstrated diffuse deposition of collagen, neutrophils, contractile myofibroblasts and synovia-like metaplasia, characteristic of a foreign body response. Conversely, within the inferior pocket where the hADM was in direct contact with the expander, we noted migration of host epithelial cells, fibroblasts, mesenchymal cells and angiogenesis, indicating host tissue regeneration. Acellular dermal matrix, when placed at the first stage of breast reconstruction, significantly reduces thickness and inflammatory character of the capsule in comparison to the patient's native tissue.
© 2016 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capsule formation; Human acellular dermal matrix; Two-stage breast reconstruction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27524677      PMCID: PMC7949984          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  16 in total

1.  Attitudes toward biological mesh in breast reconstruction: a regional survey of plastic surgeons.

Authors:  Kristen M Rezak; Kelley Gillette; Michel C Samson; Martin I Newman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with implants and inferolateral AlloDerm slings.

Authors:  Karl H Breuing; Stephen M Warren
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.539

3.  An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm).

Authors:  C Andrew Salzberg; Andrew Y Ashikari; R Michael Koch; Elizabeth Chabner-Thompson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Histologic analysis of zafirlukast's effect on capsule formation around silicone implants.

Authors:  Erika M Bastos; Miguel S Neto; Maria Teresa S Alves; Elvio B Garcia; Rafael A Santos; Thaís Heink; Juliana B Pereira; Lydia M Ferreira
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  Applications of acellular dermal matrix in revision breast reconstruction surgery.

Authors:  Scott L Spear; Sarah R Sher; Ali Al-Attar; Troy Pittman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  An updated review of mechanotransduction in skin disorders: transcriptional regulators, ion channels, and microRNAs.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Yifan Zhang; Ning Zhang; Chuandong Wang; Tanja Herrler; Qingfeng Li
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Acellular cadaveric dermis decreases the inflammatory response in capsule formation in reconstructive breast surgery.

Authors:  C Bob Basu; Mimi Leong; M John Hicks
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates.

Authors:  Claudia R Albornoz; Peter B Bach; Babak J Mehrara; Joseph J Disa; Andrea L Pusic; Colleen M McCarthy; Peter G Cordeiro; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Use of the acellular dermal matrix in revisionary aesthetic breast surgery.

Authors:  G Patrick Maxwell; Allen Gabriel
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.283

10.  Chronic inflammation imposes aberrant cell fate in regenerating epithelia through mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Craig S Nowell; Pascal D Odermatt; Luca Azzolin; Sylke Hohnel; Erwin F Wagner; Georg E Fantner; Matthias P Lutolf; Yann Barrandon; Stefano Piccolo; Freddy Radtke
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 28.824

View more
  9 in total

1.  The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction provides protection from postmastectomy radiation therapy: a clinicopathologic perspective.

Authors:  Tae Hwan Park; Soon Won Chung; Seung Yong Song; Dae Hyun Lew; Tai Suk Roh; Dong Won Lee
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  The Impact of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on the Outcomes of Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Abdelrahman Awadeen; Mohamed Fareed; Ali Mohamed Elameen
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 3.  Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy, from the Subpectoral to the Prepectoral Approach: An Evidence-Based Change of Mind?

Authors:  Andrea Weinzierl; Daniel Schmauss; Davide Brucato; Yves Harder
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Prepectoral breast reconstruction and radiotherapy-a closer look.

Authors:  Steven Sigalove
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

5.  One-step prepectoral breast reconstruction with porcine dermal matrix-covered implant: a protective technique improving the outcome in post-mastectomy radiation therapy setting.

Authors:  Susanna Polotto; Maria Luisa Bergamini; Giuseppe Pedrazzi; Maria F Arcuri; Francesca Gussago; Leonardo Cattelani
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-04

6.  Acellular Dermal Matrix Reduces Myofibroblast Presence in the Breast Capsule.

Authors:  Ruth Tevlin; Mimi R Borrelli; Dre Irizarry; Dung Nguyen; Derrick C Wan; Arash Momeni
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-05-17

7.  Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction in Morbidly Obese Patients.

Authors:  Allen Gabriel; Toni L Storm-Dickerson; Vivian Chan; Rob Lord; Erin O'Rorke; G Patrick Maxwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-04-13

8.  Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Short-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Steven Sigalove; G Patrick Maxwell; Noemi M Sigalove; Toni L Storm-Dickerson; Nicole Pope; Jami Rice; Allen Gabriel
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-12-28

9.  Comparison of the Incidence of Capsular Formation in Two-Stage, Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using an Insertion Funnel and Sizer.

Authors:  Jun Hyeok Kim; Jung Hyeou Kim; Ahwon Lee; Suk-Ho Moon; Young-Joon Jun; Deuk Young Oh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.