Literature DB >> 23269777

Development and qualitative evaluation of a self-management workshop for testicular cancer survivor-initiated follow-up.

Faith Martin1, Andrew Turner, Claire Bourne, Lynn Batehup.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To describe the needs of testicular cancer survivors, develop a nurse-led workshop, and explore the experience of participation. RESEARCH APPROACH: A systematic intervention development process was used to design a self-management workshop for cancer survivors, which then was evaluated qualitatively.
SETTING: Outpatient clinic in England. PARTICIPANTS: 26 healthcare professionals, charity workers, family members, and testicular cancer survivors participated in the intervention development process. Six testicular cancer survivors attended the workshop and participated in the postintervention focus group discussion. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: Ten participants, including four survivors, completed the initial needs assessment interviews. Twenty-six participants then rated the identified needs on two dimensions: importance to self-management and changeability via a self-management intervention. Literature review and expert consultation were used to identify potential workshop components. To explore the experience of attending the intervention, six testicular cancer survivors who participated in the nurse-led workshop were interviewed six weeks later.
FINDINGS: The workshop was well received by participants, who appreciated the goal-setting and information provision activities. The men also felt that they had benefited from the experience of being in the group.
CONCLUSIONS: Testicular cancer survivors had unmet post-treatment needs. The systematic intervention development method led to an evidence-based workshop to address those needs. Men reported benefits from attending the workshop, which may help maintain and improve health.
INTERPRETATION: Nurse-led workshops can address the current unmet needs of testicular cancer survivors. KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION: Testicular cancer survivors may require support with health information, maintaining psychological health, and monitoring cancer symptoms. Survivors also need help planning and maintaining an active lifestyle. In addition, a brief workshop approach to intervention delivery is acceptable to testicular cancer survivors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23269777     DOI: 10.1188/13.ONF.E14-E23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  9 in total

Review 1.  Conceptualisation of self-management intervention for people with early stage dementia.

Authors:  Faith Martin; Andrew Turner; Louise M Wallace; Nicola Bradbury
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2012-11-07

Review 2.  Cancer survivors' perspectives on adjustment-focused self-management interventions: a qualitative meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Laura Coffey; Orla Mooney; Simon Dunne; Linda Sharp; Aileen Timmons; Deirdre Desmond; Eleanor O'Sullivan; Conrad Timon; Rachael Gooberman-Hill; Pamela Gallagher
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Dismantling the present and future threats of testicular cancer: a grounded theory of positive and negative adjustment trajectories.

Authors:  Lauren Matheson; Mary Boulton; Verna Lavender; Andrew Protheroe; Sue Brand; Marta Wanat; Eila Watson
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Applying the Chronic Care Model to Support Ostomy Self-Management: Implications for Oncology Nursing Practice.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ercolano; Marcia Grant; Ruth McCorkle; Nancy J Tallman; Martha D Cobb; Christopher Wendel; Robert Krouse
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 1.027

Review 5.  The accessibility and acceptability of self-management support interventions for men with long term conditions: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Paul Galdas; Zoe Darwin; Lisa Kidd; Christian Blickem; Kerri McPherson; Kate Hunt; Peter Bower; Simon Gilbody; Gerry Richardson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Follow-up after curative treatment for colorectal cancer: longitudinal evaluation of patient initiated follow-up in the first 12 months.

Authors:  L Batehup; K Porter; H Gage; P Williams; P Simmonds; E Lowson; L Dodson; N J Davies; R Wagland; J D Winter; A Richardson; A Turner; J L Corner
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Experiences of Participants in a Self-Management Program for Employees with Complaints of the Arm, Neck or Shoulder (CANS): A Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Nathan Hutting; Sarah I Detaille; Yvonne F Heerkens; Josephine A Engels; J Bart Staal; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-03

8.  A web-based intervention (RESTORE) to support self-management of cancer-related fatigue following primary cancer treatment: a multi-centre proof of concept randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Claire Foster; Chloe Grimmett; Christine M May; Sean Ewings; Michelle Myall; Claire Hulme; Peter W Smith; Cassandra Powers; Lynn Calman; Jo Armes; Matthew Breckons; Jessica Corner; Deborah Fenlon; Lynn Batehup; Elaine Lennan; Carl R May; Carolyn Morris; Amanda Neylon; Emma Ream; Lesley Turner; Lucy Yardley; Alison Richardson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Help to Overcome Problems Effectively for Cancer Survivors: Development and Evaluation of a Digital Self-Management Program.

Authors:  Hayley Wright; Louise Moody; Becky Whiteman; Michael McGillion; Wendy Clyne; Gemma Pearce; Andy Turner; Faith Martin
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 5.428

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.