Lauren Matheson1, Mary Boulton2, Verna Lavender2, Andrew Protheroe3, Sue Brand4, Marta Wanat2, Eila Watson2. 1. Cancer Care Research Group, Department of Applied Health and Professional Development, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Marston, Oxford, OX3 0FL, UK. l.matheson@brookes.ac.uk. 2. Cancer Care Research Group, Department of Applied Health and Professional Development, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Marston, Oxford, OX3 0FL, UK. 3. University of Oxford Department of Oncology, Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, UK. 4. Bristol Testicular Cancer Service, Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, University Hospitals Bristol, Horfield Road, Bristol, BS2 8ED, UK.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Testicular cancer commonly affects men in the prime of their lives. While survival rates are excellent, little previous research has examined men's experiences of adjustment to survivorship. We aimed to explore this issue in younger testicular cancer survivors. METHODS: In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with testicular cancer survivors over two time points approximately 6 months apart in the year following treatment completion. Interviews were analysed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: The sample included 18 testicular cancer survivors between 22 and 44 years (mean age 34). A grounded theory was developed, which explained the process of positive adjustment over the first year following the treatment completion in terms of men's ability to dismantle the present and future threats of cancer, involving the key transitions of gaining a sense of perspective and striving to get on with life and restore normality. These were facilitated by six key processes. The processes that explained a negative adjustment trajectory are also presented. CONCLUSIONS: These findings contribute to the understanding of the psychosocial impact of testicular cancer on younger men's lives and have implications for the provision of support to testicular cancer survivors. Further investigation into the feasibility of one-on-one peer support interventions is warranted, as well as informal support that respects men's desire for independence. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Understanding the processes involved in adjustment highlights ways in which health professionals can offer support to those struggling to adjust through challenging illness beliefs, encouraging emotional disclosure and facilitating peer mentoring.
PURPOSE:Testicular cancer commonly affects men in the prime of their lives. While survival rates are excellent, little previous research has examined men's experiences of adjustment to survivorship. We aimed to explore this issue in younger testicular cancer survivors. METHODS: In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with testicular cancer survivors over two time points approximately 6 months apart in the year following treatment completion. Interviews were analysed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: The sample included 18 testicular cancer survivors between 22 and 44 years (mean age 34). A grounded theory was developed, which explained the process of positive adjustment over the first year following the treatment completion in terms of men's ability to dismantle the present and future threats of cancer, involving the key transitions of gaining a sense of perspective and striving to get on with life and restore normality. These were facilitated by six key processes. The processes that explained a negative adjustment trajectory are also presented. CONCLUSIONS: These findings contribute to the understanding of the psychosocial impact of testicular cancer on younger men's lives and have implications for the provision of support to testicular cancer survivors. Further investigation into the feasibility of one-on-one peer support interventions is warranted, as well as informal support that respects men's desire for independence. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Understanding the processes involved in adjustment highlights ways in which health professionals can offer support to those struggling to adjust through challenging illness beliefs, encouraging emotional disclosure and facilitating peer mentoring.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adjustment; Cancer survivorship; Grounded theory; Qualitative; Testicular cancer
Authors: Melissa Y Carpentier; J Dennis Fortenberry; Mary A Ott; Mary J Brames; Lawrence H Einhorn Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2010-05-20 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Lynn Batehup; Heather Gage; Peter Williams; Alison Richardson; Katerina Porter; Peter Simmonds; Elizabeth Lowson; Lynne Dodson; Nicola Davies; Richard Wagland; Jane Winter; Andrew Turner; Jessica Corner Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2021-08-22 Impact factor: 2.328
Authors: Victoria Dax; Maria Ftanou; Ben Tran; Jeremy Lewin; Rebecca Wallace; Zac Seidler; Joshua F Wiley Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 3.955