Literature DB >> 23265800

Spine detection in CT and MR using iterated marginal space learning.

B Michael Kelm1, Michael Wels, S Kevin Zhou, Sascha Seifert, Michael Suehling, Yefeng Zheng, Dorin Comaniciu.   

Abstract

Examinations of the spinal column with both, Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging and Computed Tomography (CT), often require a precise three-dimensional positioning, angulation and labeling of the spinal disks and the vertebrae. A fully automatic and robust approach is a prerequisite for an automated scan alignment as well as for the segmentation and analysis of spinal disks and vertebral bodies in Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) applications. In this article, we present a novel method that combines Marginal Space Learning (MSL), a recently introduced concept for efficient discriminative object detection, with a generative anatomical network that incorporates relative pose information for the detection of multiple objects. It is used to simultaneously detect and label the spinal disks. While a novel iterative version of MSL is used to quickly generate candidate detections comprising position, orientation, and scale of the disks with high sensitivity, the anatomical network selects the most likely candidates using a learned prior on the individual nine dimensional transformation spaces. Finally, we propose an optional case-adaptive segmentation approach that allows to segment the spinal disks and vertebrae in MR and CT respectively. Since the proposed approaches are learning-based, they can be trained for MR or CT alike. Experimental results based on 42 MR and 30 CT volumes show that our system not only achieves superior accuracy but also is among the fastest systems of its kind in the literature. On the MR data set the spinal disks of a whole spine are detected in 11.5s on average with 98.6% sensitivity and 0.073 false positive detections per volume. On the CT data a comparable sensitivity of 98.0% with 0.267 false positives is achieved. Detected disks are localized with an average position error of 2.4 mm/3.2 mm and angular error of 3.9°/4.5° in MR/CT, which is close to the employed hypothesis resolution of 2.1 mm and 3.3°.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Generative-discriminative detection; Marginal space learning; Spinal disk segmentation; Spine detection; Vertebra segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23265800     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2012.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  12 in total

1.  Cooperative strategy for a dynamic ensemble of classification models in clinical applications: the case of MRI vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Paola Casti; Arianna Mencattini; Marcello H Nogueira-Barbosa; Lucas Frighetto-Pereira; Paulo Mazzoncini Azevedo-Marques; Eugenio Martinelli; Corrado Di Natale
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  Progress in Fully Automated Abdominal CT Interpretation.

Authors:  Ronald M Summers
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Spine labeling in MRI via regularized distribution matching.

Authors:  Seyed-Parsa Hojjat; Ismail Ayed; Gregory J Garvin; Kumaradevan Punithakumar
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Fully automatic cross-modality localization and labeling of vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs in 3D spinal images.

Authors:  Maria Wimmer; David Major; Alexey A Novikov; Katja Bühler
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Automatic detection of vertebral number abnormalities in body CT images.

Authors:  Shouhei Hanaoka; Yoshiyasu Nakano; Mitsutaka Nemoto; Yukihiro Nomura; Tomomi Takenaga; Soichiro Miki; Takeharu Yoshikawa; Naoto Hayashi; Yoshitaka Masutani; Akinobu Shimizu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  3D lumbar spine intervertebral disc segmentation and compression simulation from MRI using shape-aware models.

Authors:  Rabia Haq; Rifat Aras; David A Besachio; Roderick C Borgie; Michel A Audette
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 7.  On computerized methods for spine analysis in MRI: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marko Rak; Klaus D Tönnies
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Automated Pathogenesis-Based Diagnosis of Lumbar Neural Foraminal Stenosis via Deep Multiscale Multitask Learning.

Authors:  Zhongyi Han; Benzheng Wei; Stephanie Leung; Ilanit Ben Nachum; David Laidley; Shuo Li
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2018-10

9.  Detection of Degenerative Changes on MR Images of the Lumbar Spine with a Convolutional Neural Network: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Nils Christian Lehnen; Robert Haase; Jennifer Faber; Theodor Rüber; Hartmut Vatter; Alexander Radbruch; Frederic Carsten Schmeel
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19

10.  A method of localization and segmentation of intervertebral discs in spine MRI based on Gabor filter bank.

Authors:  Xinjian Zhu; Xuan He; Pin Wang; Qinghua He; Dandan Gao; Jiwei Cheng; Baoming Wu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.