Literature DB >> 23265714

Minimal residual disease after induction is the strongest predictor of prognosis in intermediate risk relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia - long-term results of trial ALL-REZ BFM P95/96.

Cornelia Eckert1, Arend von Stackelberg, Karl Seeger, Tom W L Groeneveld, Christina Peters, Thomas Klingebiel, Arndt Borkhardt, Martin Schrappe, Gabriele Escherich, Günter Henze.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This blinded prospective study was performed to optimise the risk assessment of children with a late isolated, combined or an early combined bone marrow (BM) relapse of precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). The aim was to develop a reliable tool to identify patients with an intermediate risk relapse who are in need of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
METHODS: Included were 80 children and adolescents with first intermediate risk BM relapse of ALL recruited in trial ALL-REZ BFM P95/96. We assessed the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) after induction therapy quantified by PCR using leukaemia clone-specific T-cell receptor/immunoglobulin gene rearrangements.
RESULTS: Molecular good responders (MRD < 10(-3), n=46) had a probability of event-free survival (pEFS) at 10 years of 76% standard error (SE) ± 6% and a cumulative incidence of second relapse (CIR) at 10 years of 21% SE ± 6%; pEFS of molecular poor responders (MRD ≥ 10(-3), n=34) at 10 years was 18% SE ± 7% and CIR 61% SE ± 9% (p<0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed MRD after induction to be the strongest independent prognostic parameter with a 6.6-fold increased risk (95% confidence interval 3.3-13.5, p<0.001) for molecular poor responders to suffer a subsequent adverse event compared to good responders.
CONCLUSION: In patients with intermediate risk BM relapse of ALL, low MRD after induction is associated with an excellent long-term prognosis with conventional chemo-/radiotherapy whereas patients with insufficient response have an extremely poor prognosis. Therefore, in the subsequent trial ALL-REZ BFM 2002, MRD is used to allocate molecular good responders to conventional post-induction therapy and molecular poor responders to allogeneic HSCT.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23265714     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  25 in total

Review 1.  Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Authors:  Pietro Merli; Mattia Algeri; Francesca Del Bufalo; Franco Locatelli
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  Editorial: addressing controversies in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  Sameer Bakhshi; Bivas Biswas
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Minimal residual disease analysis by eight-color flow cytometry in relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Leonid Karawajew; Michael Dworzak; Richard Ratei; Peter Rhein; Giuseppe Gaipa; Barbara Buldini; Giuseppe Basso; Ondrej Hrusak; Wolf-Dieter Ludwig; Günter Henze; Karl Seeger; Arend von Stackelberg; Ester Mejstrikova; Cornelia Eckert
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: How to Recognize and Treat It.

Authors:  Nicholas J Short; Elias Jabbour
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Flow Cytometry Based MRD and Its Impact on Survival Outcome in Children and Young Adults with ALL: A Prospective Study from a Tertiary Cancer Centre in Southern India.

Authors:  Soumya Surath Panda; Venkatraman Radhakrishnan; Prasanth Ganesan; Rejiv Rajendranath; Trivadi S Ganesan; Kamalalayan Raghavan Rajalekshmy; Rajesh Kumar Bhola; Hemlata Das; Tenali Gnana Sagar
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 0.900

6.  Differential impact of minimal residual disease negativity according to the salvage status in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Elias Jabbour; Nicholas J Short; Jeffrey L Jorgensen; Musa Yilmaz; Farhad Ravandi; Sa A Wang; Deborah A Thomas; Joseph Khoury; Richard E Champlin; Issa Khouri; Partow Kebriaei; Susan M O'Brien; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Jorge E Cortes; Koji Sasaki; Courtney D Dinardo; Tapan M Kadia; Nitin Jain; Marina Konopleva; Rebecca Garris; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Monitoring minimal residual disease in children with high-risk relapses of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: prognostic relevance of early and late assessment.

Authors:  C Eckert; N Hagedorn; L Sramkova; G Mann; R Panzer-Grümayer; C Peters; J-P Bourquin; T Klingebiel; A Borkhardt; G Cario; J Alten; G Escherich; K Astrahantseff; K Seeger; G Henze; A von Stackelberg
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  Dasatinib Plus Intensive Chemotherapy in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of Children's Oncology Group Trial AALL0622.

Authors:  William B Slayton; Kirk R Schultz; John A Kairalla; Meenakshi Devidas; Xinlei Mi; Michael A Pulsipher; Bill H Chang; Charles Mullighan; Ilaria Iacobucci; Lewis B Silverman; Michael J Borowitz; Andrew J Carroll; Nyla A Heerema; Julie M Gastier-Foster; Brent L Wood; Sherri L Mizrahy; Thomas Merchant; Valerie I Brown; Lance Sieger; Marilyn J Siegel; Elizabeth A Raetz; Naomi J Winick; Mignon L Loh; William L Carroll; Stephen P Hunger
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 9.  Treatment of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Stacy L Cooper; Patrick A Brown
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.278

Review 10.  Minimal Residual Disease Evaluation in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Clinical Evidence Review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-03-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.