Literature DB >> 32425381

Flow Cytometry Based MRD and Its Impact on Survival Outcome in Children and Young Adults with ALL: A Prospective Study from a Tertiary Cancer Centre in Southern India.

Soumya Surath Panda1, Venkatraman Radhakrishnan2, Prasanth Ganesan2, Rejiv Rajendranath2, Trivadi S Ganesan2, Kamalalayan Raghavan Rajalekshmy2, Rajesh Kumar Bhola1, Hemlata Das1, Tenali Gnana Sagar2.   

Abstract

Presence of minimal residual disease (MRD) following induction chemotherapy is a well-recognized risk factor to predict relapse in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). There is paucity of data on MRD and outcome in ALL from India. We share our experience in establishing a flow cytometry-based MRD assay for ALL with emphasis on determination of the number of patients who had MRD on day 35 of induction therapy and its correlation with outcome and other prognostic factors. We prospectively studied MRD in patients with ALL less than 25 years who achieved morphological complete remission with induction therapy. The initial series consisted of 104 patients with ALL. Ninety-two patients had bone marrow samples collected on day 35 of remission induction chemotherapy that was adequate for MRD. Strategy of monitoring MRD was based on flow cytometry using six color staining according the leukemia associated immunophenotype found at diagnosis. Data analysis was done using Fisher exact test. The median age was 8.5 years (range 0.9-22 years). Thirty-seven out of ninety-two patients (40.2%) had MRD at end of induction. MRD on day 35 was between 0.01 and 0.1% in 18.9% of patients, between 0.1 and 1% in 59.5% and more than 1% in 21.6% patients. Among the patients who had MRD, 16.7% had favourable cytogenetics, 60% had intermediate and 13.3% had high-risk cytogenetics. The presence or absence of residual leukemia by flow cytometry at day 35 was not significantly related to age (p = 1.0), male gender (p = 0.08) hyperleukocytosis (p = 0.25) or day 8 blast clearance (p = 0.21). However, T cell phenotype (p < 0.001) was significantly associated with MRD. The 5-year event free survival (EFS) for patients who had MRD versus those who did not was 69% and 61.1% respectively (p = 0.41). The 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients who had MRD versus those who did not was 72.5% and 61.1% respectively (p = 0.33). Flow cytometric techniques can be applied to monitor MRD in patients of ALL undergoing induction therapy. Our results suggest MRD correlates with certain known prognostic factors. Though the EFS and OS was lower in MRD positive patients, the results were not statistically significant probably because of the small sample size. © Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute lymphoblastic leukemia; Flow cytometry; Minimal residual disease

Year:  2019        PMID: 32425381      PMCID: PMC7229125          DOI: 10.1007/s12288-019-01228-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus        ISSN: 0971-4502            Impact factor:   0.900


  38 in total

1.  The significance of graft-versus-host disease and pretransplantation minimal residual disease status to outcome after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  M Uzunel; J Mattsson; M Jaksch; M Remberger; O Ringdén
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Molecular detection of minimal residual disease in adult and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia reveals differences in treatment response.

Authors:  L Foroni; L A Coyle; M Papaioannou; J C Yaxley; M F Sinclair; J S Chim; P Cannell; L M Secker-Walker; A B Mehta; H G Prentice; A V Hoffbrand
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  Minimal residual disease after intensive induction therapy in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia predicts outcome.

Authors:  B Gruhn; S Hongeng; H Yi; M L Hancock; J E Rubnitz; G A Neale; G R Kitchingman
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Immunological detection of minimal residual disease in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  E Coustan-Smith; F G Behm; J Sanchez; J M Boyett; M L Hancock; S C Raimondi; J E Rubnitz; G K Rivera; J T Sandlund; C H Pui; D Campana
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-02-21       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Minimal residual disease in adolescent (older than 14 years) and adult acute lymphoblastic leukemias: early immunophenotypic evaluation has high clinical value.

Authors:  María-Belén Vidriales; José J Pérez; Maria Consuelo López-Berges; Norma Gutiérrez; Juana Ciudad; Paulo Lucio; Lourdes Vazquez; Ramón García-Sanz; Maria Consuelo del Cañizo; Javier Fernández-Calvo; Fernando Ramos; M Jesús Rodríguez; M José Calmuntia; Ana Porwith; Alberto Orfao; Jesús F San-Miguel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Rearrangement status of the malignant cell determines type of secondary IgH rearrangement (V-replacement or V to DJ joining) in childhood B precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  E J Steenbergen; O J Verhagen; H van den Berg; E F van Leeuwen; H Behrendt; R R Slater; A E von dem Borne; C E van der Schoot
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.528

7.  Prognostic significance and modalities of flow cytometric minimal residual disease detection in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Michael N Dworzak; Gertraud Fröschl; Dieter Printz; Georg Mann; Ulrike Pötschger; Nora Mühlegger; Gerhard Fritsch; Helmut Gadner
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Minimal residual disease status before allogeneic bone marrow transplantation is an important determinant of successful outcome for children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  C J Knechtli; N J Goulden; J P Hancock; V L Grandage; E L Harris; R J Garland; C G Jones; A W Rowbottom; L P Hunt; A F Green; E Clarke; A W Lankester; J M Cornish; D H Pamphilon; C G Steward; A Oakhill
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  Role of minimal residual disease monitoring in adult and pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Dario Campana
Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.722

10.  Minimal residual disease after induction is the strongest predictor of prognosis in intermediate risk relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia - long-term results of trial ALL-REZ BFM P95/96.

Authors:  Cornelia Eckert; Arend von Stackelberg; Karl Seeger; Tom W L Groeneveld; Christina Peters; Thomas Klingebiel; Arndt Borkhardt; Martin Schrappe; Gabriele Escherich; Günter Henze
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 9.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.