Literature DB >> 27099643

Minimal Residual Disease Evaluation in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Clinical Evidence Review.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Leukemia accounts for nearly a third of childhood cancers in Canada, with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) comprising nearly 80% of cases. Identification of prognostic factors that allow risk stratification and tailored treatment have improved overall survival. However, nearly a quarter of patients considered standard risk on the basis of conventional prognostic factors still relapse, and relapse is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Relapse is thought to result from extremely low levels of leukemic cells left over once complete remission is reached, termed minimal residual disease (MRD). Poor event-free survival (EFS) as well as overall survival for those who are classified as MRD-positive have been substantiated in seminal studies demonstrating the prognostic value of MRD for EFS in the past few decades. This review sought to further elucidate the relationship between MRD and EFS by looking at relapse, the primary determinant of EFS and the biological mechanism through which MRD is thought to act. This evidence review aimed to ascertain whether MRD is an independent prognostic factor for relapse and to assess the effect of MRD-directed treatment on patient-important outcomes in childhood ALL.
METHODS: Large prospective cohort studies with a priori multivariable analysis that includes potential confounders are required to draw confirmatory conclusions about the independence of a prognostic factor. Data on the prognostic value of MRD for relapse measured by molecular methods (polymerase chain reaction [PCR] of immunoglobulin or T-cell receptor rearrangements) or flow cytometry for leukemia-associated immunophenotypes or difference-from-normal approach were abstracted from included studies. Relevant data on relapse, EFS, and overall survival were abstracted from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of MRD-directed treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 2,832 citations were reviewed, of which 12 studies were included in this review. All cohort studies evaluating MRD as a prognostic factor for relapse found significant independent value when added to various existing prognostic factors. Seven studies showed prognostic value of MRD measured at the end of induction therapy and two at the end of consolidation therapy in de novo ALL, one study in relapsed ALL after re-induction therapy, and three studies before hematopoietic stem cell transplant. One large RCT in standard-risk patients found no compromise to outcomes when reducing treatment in MRD-negative patients, and also showed a 45% reduction in relapse risk and nearly 40% benefit in EFS when escalating treatment in MRD-positive patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Minimal residual disease is an independent prognostic factor for relapse in childhood ALL. Relapse is a key determinant of EFS and patients' quality of life. Treatment selected on the basis of MRD status appears to improve outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27099643      PMCID: PMC4808716     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser        ISSN: 1915-7398


  62 in total

1.  Prognostic or predictive? It's time to get back to definitions!

Authors:  Antoine Italiano
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Quantitative analysis of minimal residual disease predicts relapse in children with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia in DFCI ALL Consortium Protocol 95-01.

Authors:  Jianbiao Zhou; Meredith A Goldwasser; Aihong Li; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Donna Neuberg; Hongjun Wang; Virginia Dalton; Kathryn D McBride; Stephen E Sallan; Lewis B Silverman; John G Gribben
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 3.  Standardized MRD quantification in European ALL trials: proceedings of the Second International Symposium on MRD assessment in Kiel, Germany, 18-20 September 2008.

Authors:  M Brüggemann; A Schrauder; T Raff; H Pfeifer; M Dworzak; O G Ottmann; V Asnafi; A Baruchel; R Bassan; Y Benoit; A Biondi; H Cavé; H Dombret; A K Fielding; R Foà; N Gökbuget; A H Goldstone; N Goulden; G Henze; D Hoelzer; G E Janka-Schaub; E A Macintyre; R Pieters; A Rambaldi; J-M Ribera; K Schmiegelow; O Spinelli; J Stary; A von Stackelberg; M Kneba; M Schrappe; J J M van Dongen
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 11.528

4.  Immunological detection of minimal residual disease in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  E Coustan-Smith; F G Behm; J Sanchez; J M Boyett; M L Hancock; S C Raimondi; J E Rubnitz; G K Rivera; J T Sandlund; C H Pui; D Campana
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-02-21       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Minimal residual disease (MRD) status prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a powerful predictor for post-transplant outcome in children with ALL.

Authors:  P Bader; J Hancock; H Kreyenberg; N J Goulden; D Niethammer; A Oakhill; C G Steward; R Handgretinger; J F Beck; T Klingebiel
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Clinical value of pre-transplant minimal residual disease in childhood lymphoblastic leukaemia: the results of the French minimal residual disease-guided protocol.

Authors:  Virginie Gandemer; Cécile Pochon; Emmanuel Oger; Jean-Hugues H Dalle; Gérard Michel; Claudine Schmitt; Eva de Berranger; Claire Galambrun; Hélène Cavé; Jean-Michel Cayuela; Nathalie Grardel; Elizabeth Macintyre; Geneviève Margueritte; Françoise Méchinaud; Pierre Rorhlich; Patrick Lutz; François Demeocq; Pascale Schneider; Dominique Plantaz; Marilyne Poirée; Pierre Bordigoni
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 7.  Current management and challenges of malignant disease in the CNS in paediatric leukaemia.

Authors:  Ching-Hon Pui; Scott C Howard
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 8.  Detection of minimal residual disease in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gaipa; Giuseppe Basso; Andrea Biondi; Dario Campana
Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.058

9.  Issues in using progression-free survival when evaluating oncology products.

Authors:  Thomas R Fleming; Mark D Rothmann; Hong Laura Lu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Outcome prediction in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia by molecular quantification of residual disease at the end of induction.

Authors:  M J Brisco; J Condon; E Hughes; S H Neoh; P J Sykes; R Seshadri; I Toogood; K Waters; G Tauro; H Ekert
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-01-22       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  4 in total

1.  Analytical evaluation of the clonoSEQ Assay for establishing measurable (minimal) residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Travers Ching; Megan E Duncan; Tera Newman-Eerkes; Mollie M E McWhorter; Jeffrey M Tracy; Michelle S Steen; Ryan P Brown; Srivatsa Venkatasubbarao; Nicholas K Akers; Marissa Vignali; Martin E Moorhead; Drew Watson; Ryan O Emerson; Tobias P Mann; B Melina Cimler; Pamela L Swatkowski; Ilan R Kirsch; Charles Sang; Harlan S Robins; Bryan Howie; Anna Sherwood
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.430

2.  Risk Factors for Relapse of Childhood B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Authors:  Rongrong Zhang; Haiyan Zhu; Yufang Yuan; Jiou Zhao; Xiaochun Yang; Zhaofang Tian
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-07-03

3.  CD81 knockout promotes chemosensitivity and disrupts in vivo homing and engraftment in acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Anthony Quagliano; Anilkumar Gopalakrishnapillai; E Anders Kolb; Sonali P Barwe
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-09-22

4.  [A correlation study between the minimal residual disease detection using multiparameter flow cytometry and prognosis of childhood acute B lymphoblastic leukemia].

Authors:  J Feng; X J Chen; X M Liu; Y Zou; Y Guo; W Y Yang; Y M Chen; L Zhang; S C Wang; M Ruan; F Liu; T F Liu; B Q Qi; X F Zhu; H J Wang
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-08-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.