Literature DB >> 23263882

Subgroup specific incremental value of new markers for risk prediction.

Qian M Zhou1, Yingye Zheng, Tianxi Cai.   

Abstract

In many clinical applications, understanding when measurement of new markers is necessary to provide added accuracy to existing prediction tools could lead to more cost effective disease management. Many statistical tools for evaluating the incremental value (IncV) of the novel markers over the routine clinical risk factors have been developed in recent years. However, most existing literature focuses primarily on global assessment. Since the IncVs of new markers often vary across subgroups, it would be of great interest to identify subgroups for which the new markers are most/least useful in improving risk prediction. In this paper we provide novel statistical procedures for systematically identifying potential traditional-marker based subgroups in whom it might be beneficial to apply a new model with measurements of both the novel and traditional markers. We consider various conditional time-dependent accuracy parameters for censored failure time outcome to assess the subgroup-specific IncVs. We provide non-parametric kernel-based estimation procedures to calculate the proposed parameters. Simultaneous interval estimation procedures are provided to account for sampling variation and adjust for multiple testing. Simulation studies suggest that our proposed procedures work well in finite samples. The proposed procedures are applied to the Framingham Offspring Study to examine the added value of an inflammation marker, C-reactive protein, on top of the traditional Framingham risk score for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23263882      PMCID: PMC3633735          DOI: 10.1007/s10985-012-9235-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  33 in total

1.  Combining several screening tests: optimality of the risk score.

Authors:  Martin W McIntosh; Margaret Sullivan Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Performance of common genetic variants in breast-cancer risk models.

Authors:  Sholom Wacholder; Patricia Hartge; Ross Prentice; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Heather Spencer Feigelson; W Ryan Diver; Michael J Thun; David G Cox; Susan E Hankinson; Peter Kraft; Bernard Rosner; Christine D Berg; Louise A Brinton; Jolanta Lissowska; Mark E Sherman; Rowan Chlebowski; Charles Kooperberg; Rebecca D Jackson; Dennis W Buckman; Peter Hui; Ruth Pfeiffer; Kevin B Jacobs; Gilles D Thomas; Robert N Hoover; Mitchell H Gail; Stephen J Chanock; David J Hunter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Robust combination of multiple diagnostic tests for classifying censored event times.

Authors:  T Cai; S Cheng
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Risk prediction and finding new independent prognostic factors.

Authors:  Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.844

Review 5.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories.

Authors:  P W Wilson; R B D'Agostino; D Levy; A M Belanger; H Silbershatz; W B Kannel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-05-12       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Association between a literature-based genetic risk score and cardiovascular events in women.

Authors:  Nina P Paynter; Daniel I Chasman; Guillaume Paré; Julie E Buring; Nancy R Cook; Joseph P Miletich; Paul M Ridker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Advances in measuring the effect of individual predictors of cardiovascular risk: the role of reclassification measures.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook; Paul M Ridker
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Identifying subjects who benefit from additional information for better prediction of the outcome variables.

Authors:  L Tian; T Cai; L J Wei
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  C-reactive protein and the prediction of cardiovascular events among those at intermediate risk: moving an inflammatory hypothesis toward consensus.

Authors:  Paul M Ridker
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  2 in total

1.  Six articles related to risk assessment and prediction based on work presented at the October 12–14, 2011 Conference on Risk Assessment and Evaluation of Predictions in Silver Spring, Maryland.

Authors:  Mitchell H Gail; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Reclassification calibration test for censored survival data: performance and comparison to goodness-of-fit criteria.

Authors:  Olga V Demler; Nina P Paynter; Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2018-07-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.