CONTEXT: While multiple genetic markers associated with cardiovascular disease have been identified by genome-wide association studies, their aggregate effect on risk beyond traditional factors is uncertain, particularly among women. OBJECTIVE: To test the predictive ability of a literature-based genetic risk score for cardiovascular disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort of 19,313 initially healthy white women in the Women's Genome Health Study followed up over a median of 12.3 years (interquartile range, 11.6-12.8 years). Genetic risk scores were constructed from the National Human Genome Research Institute's catalog of genome-wide association study results published between 2005 and June 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incident myocardial infarction, stroke, arterial revascularization, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: A total of 101 single nucleotide polymorphisms reported to be associated with cardiovascular disease or at least 1 intermediate cardiovascular disease phenotype at a published P value of less than 10(-7) were identified and risk alleles were added to create a genetic risk score. During follow-up, 777 cardiovascular disease events occurred (199 myocardial infarctions, 203 strokes, 63 cardiovascular deaths, 312 revascularizations). After adjustment for age, the genetic risk score had a hazard ratio (HR) for cardiovascular disease of 1.02 per risk allele (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.03/risk allele; P = .006). This corresponds to an absolute cardiovascular disease risk of 3% over 10 years in the lowest tertile of genetic risk (73-99 risk alleles) and 3.7% in the highest tertile (106-125 risk alleles). However, after adjustment for traditional factors, the genetic risk score did not improve discrimination or reclassification (change in c index from Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults [ATP III] risk score, 0; net reclassification improvement, 0.5%; [P = .24]). The genetic risk score was not associated with cardiovascular disease risk (ATP III-adjusted HR/allele, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.01). In contrast, self-reported family history remained significantly associated with cardiovascular disease in multivariable models. CONCLUSION: After adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, a genetic risk score comprising 101 single nucleotide polymorphisms was not significantly associated with the incidence of total cardiovascular disease.
CONTEXT: While multiple genetic markers associated with cardiovascular disease have been identified by genome-wide association studies, their aggregate effect on risk beyond traditional factors is uncertain, particularly among women. OBJECTIVE: To test the predictive ability of a literature-based genetic risk score for cardiovascular disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort of 19,313 initially healthy white women in the Women's Genome Health Study followed up over a median of 12.3 years (interquartile range, 11.6-12.8 years). Genetic risk scores were constructed from the National Human Genome Research Institute's catalog of genome-wide association study results published between 2005 and June 2009. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incident myocardial infarction, stroke, arterial revascularization, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: A total of 101 single nucleotide polymorphisms reported to be associated with cardiovascular disease or at least 1 intermediate cardiovascular disease phenotype at a published P value of less than 10(-7) were identified and risk alleles were added to create a genetic risk score. During follow-up, 777 cardiovascular disease events occurred (199 myocardial infarctions, 203 strokes, 63 cardiovascular deaths, 312 revascularizations). After adjustment for age, the genetic risk score had a hazard ratio (HR) for cardiovascular disease of 1.02 per risk allele (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.03/risk allele; P = .006). This corresponds to an absolute cardiovascular disease risk of 3% over 10 years in the lowest tertile of genetic risk (73-99 risk alleles) and 3.7% in the highest tertile (106-125 risk alleles). However, after adjustment for traditional factors, the genetic risk score did not improve discrimination or reclassification (change in c index from Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults [ATP III] risk score, 0; net reclassification improvement, 0.5%; [P = .24]). The genetic risk score was not associated with cardiovascular disease risk (ATP III-adjusted HR/allele, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.01). In contrast, self-reported family history remained significantly associated with cardiovascular disease in multivariable models. CONCLUSION: After adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, a genetic risk score comprising 101 single nucleotide polymorphisms was not significantly associated with the incidence of total cardiovascular disease.
Authors: Robert Sladek; Ghislain Rocheleau; Johan Rung; Christian Dina; Lishuang Shen; David Serre; Philippe Boutin; Daniel Vincent; Alexandre Belisle; Samy Hadjadj; Beverley Balkau; Barbara Heude; Guillaume Charpentier; Thomas J Hudson; Alexandre Montpetit; Alexey V Pshezhetsky; Marc Prentki; Barry I Posner; David J Balding; David Meyre; Constantin Polychronakos; Philippe Froguel Journal: Nature Date: 2007-02-11 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Richa Saxena; Benjamin F Voight; Valeriya Lyssenko; Noël P Burtt; Paul I W de Bakker; Hong Chen; Jeffrey J Roix; Sekar Kathiresan; Joel N Hirschhorn; Mark J Daly; Thomas E Hughes; Leif Groop; David Altshuler; Peter Almgren; Jose C Florez; Joanne Meyer; Kristin Ardlie; Kristina Bengtsson Boström; Bo Isomaa; Guillaume Lettre; Ulf Lindblad; Helen N Lyon; Olle Melander; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Peter Nilsson; Marju Orho-Melander; Lennart Råstam; Elizabeth K Speliotes; Marja-Riitta Taskinen; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Candace Guiducci; Anna Berglund; Joyce Carlson; Lauren Gianniny; Rachel Hackett; Liselotte Hall; Johan Holmkvist; Esa Laurila; Marketa Sjögren; Maria Sterner; Aarti Surti; Margareta Svensson; Malin Svensson; Ryan Tewhey; Brendan Blumenstiel; Melissa Parkin; Matthew Defelice; Rachel Barry; Wendy Brodeur; Jody Camarata; Nancy Chia; Mary Fava; John Gibbons; Bob Handsaker; Claire Healy; Kieu Nguyen; Casey Gates; Carrie Sougnez; Diane Gage; Marcia Nizzari; Stacey B Gabriel; Gung-Wei Chirn; Qicheng Ma; Hemang Parikh; Delwood Richardson; Darrell Ricke; Shaun Purcell Journal: Science Date: 2007-04-26 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Inga Reynisdottir; Rafn Benediktsson; Thorbjorg Jonsdottir; G Bragi Walters; Unnur Styrkarsdottir; Solveig Gretarsdottir; Valur Emilsson; Shyamali Ghosh; Adam Baker; Steinunn Snorradottir; Hjordis Bjarnason; Maggie C Y Ng; Torben Hansen; Yu Bagger; Robert L Wilensky; Muredach P Reilly; Adebowale Adeyemo; Yuanxiu Chen; Jie Zhou; Vilmundur Gudnason; Guanjie Chen; Hanxia Huang; Kerrie Lashley; Ayo Doumatey; Wing-Yee So; Ronald C Y Ma; Gitte Andersen; Knut Borch-Johnsen; Torben Jorgensen; Jana V van Vliet-Ostaptchouk; Marten H Hofker; Cisca Wijmenga; Claus Christiansen; Daniel J Rader; Charles Rotimi; Mark Gurney; Juliana C N Chan; Oluf Pedersen; Gunnar Sigurdsson; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Augustine Kong; Kari Stefansson Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2007-04-26 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Véronique L Roger; Alan S Go; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; William B Borden; Dawn M Bravata; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Diane M Makuc; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Claudia S Moy; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Elsayed Z Soliman; Paul D Sorlie; Nona Sotoodehnia; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-12-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hugues Aschard; Jinbo Chen; Marilyn C Cornelis; Lori B Chibnik; Elizabeth W Karlson; Peter Kraft Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2012-05-24 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Anatoliy I Yashin; Deqing Wu; Konstantin G Arbeev; Eric Stallard; Kenneth C Land; Svetlana V Ukraintseva Journal: Rejuvenation Res Date: 2012-05-18 Impact factor: 4.663
Authors: Véronique L Roger; Alan S Go; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Robert J Adams; Jarett D Berry; Todd M Brown; Mercedes R Carnethon; Shifan Dai; Giovanni de Simone; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Kurt J Greenlund; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; P Michael Ho; Virginia J Howard; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Diane M Makuc; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Mary M McDermott; James B Meigs; Claudia S Moy; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Wayne D Rosamond; Paul D Sorlie; Randall S Stafford; Tanya N Turan; Melanie B Turner; Nathan D Wong; Judith Wylie-Rosett Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Carla A Ibrahim-Verbaas; Myriam Fornage; Joshua C Bis; Seung Hoan Choi; Bruce M Psaty; James B Meigs; Madhu Rao; Mike Nalls; Joao D Fontes; Christopher J O'Donnell; Sekar Kathiresan; Georg B Ehret; Caroline S Fox; Rainer Malik; Martin Dichgans; Helena Schmidt; Jari Lahti; Susan R Heckbert; Thomas Lumley; Kenneth Rice; Jerome I Rotter; Kent D Taylor; Aaron R Folsom; Eric Boerwinkle; Wayne D Rosamond; Eyal Shahar; Rebecca F Gottesman; Peter J Koudstaal; Najaf Amin; Renske G Wieberdink; Abbas Dehghan; Albert Hofman; André G Uitterlinden; Anita L Destefano; Stephanie Debette; Luting Xue; Alexa Beiser; Philip A Wolf; Charles Decarli; M Arfan Ikram; Sudha Seshadri; Thomas H Mosley; W T Longstreth; Cornelia M van Duijn; Lenore J Launer Journal: Stroke Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 7.914